February 27, 2007
Quiet around here, no?
Real life interferes. Between work, choir rehearsals, and a pair of illnesses (DH and I
both had the creeping crud) I've been neglecting y'all.
And frankly, I haven't been that motivated by what's going on in the world. More like disgusted into oblivion. Lately it's been easier to just turn it off than to vent about it.
We did watch the Oscars, though. As expected it was a lovefest for
Manbearpig, who didn't
really win an Oscar. He wasn't eligible, actually. Also not surprising, the adoration heaped on Hollywood's two "current" issues: global warming and gayness.
Ugh.
Do some people just not get it? There was NO major hoohah (which was a good damn thing, IMO) when two black actors won, or that latinos and asians were front runners in several categories. Just "the most diverse Oscars ever." So can we get over the Gay thing already? Please. Hell, gay people have been winning Academy Awards for years. Really. And they get married and have babies, too. It's a beautiful thing, so can we just move on?
And this whole Global warming thing. Honestly people, 30 years ago we were terrified of a new ICE AGE. Really and truly. 30 years from now, we'll be back there. I promise. And the Apostle of this new religion is the BIGGEST wastrel of all.
There's nothing wrong with being an environmentalist. I think it's important to conserve and recycle and reuse and repurpose and be smart about our energy choices and decreasing pollution in general, not just CO2. But we can not get hung up on the idea that WE are causing global warming. That's like saying a bucketful of water drains the ocean. On a 5 billion year old planet, with a sun that provides millions of times MORE energy than we can ever hope to produce without nukes, it is difficult to predict exactly how our weather is affected, if at all, by us.
What we should do is continue to study the Earth's processes and how we affect them, how other factors affect them, and how time affects them. This will take longer than the 20-some years we have been hooked on global warming. Far longer, in fact. Especially as we know that weather cycles are probably a century long, or longer.
And, if we really want conservation, we need to practice what we preach. Like
Ed Begley, Jr ., rather than
algore.
Posted by: caltechgirl at
04:05 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 404 words, total size 3 kb.
1
Yeah, Begley puts his money where his mouth is... that's a rarity with that crowd. Can you see Streisand riding her bike around town instead of having posh wheels?
Gore used more energy in August than we use in an entire year at our house. Hypocrite.
Hope y'all are feeling better soon, CTG!!
Posted by: Marie at February 28, 2007 05:37 AM (keaCm)
2
Your mind and your frankness are beautiful things!
Of course, you are beautiful, too!
; )
Posted by: Christina at February 28, 2007 08:01 AM (fvP3J)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Cloudy with a chance of fire alarm
As is usual for a Tuesday morning, DH's alarm went off at 5:30 am. Unusually enough, however, he opened our sliding glass door and woke me so I could enjoy the sound of the rain. Then he got back into bed and we snuggled with the dog and listened to this morning's storm.
Until about 5:50. At 5:45 there was a terrific downburst and a great gust of wind.
And then the neighbor's alarm system went off. The rain had shorted the alarm bell mechanism on the fire system in the townhouses next door. By 6:05 the firemen were knocking on doors looking for a fire or malfunctioning sprinklers. Finding none, they left.
Alarm still ringing. E flat, in case you were wondering.
The alarm FINALLY was silenced at about 7:30 am, although I'm not sure if it dried out or they got an alarm repairman in to fix it.
It was a hell of a morning!
Posted by: caltechgirl at
02:04 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 171 words, total size 1 kb.
February 16, 2007
going dark briefly
On hiatus for the long weekend. Have a good one, everybody!
Posted by: caltechgirl at
10:15 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 17 words, total size 1 kb.
1
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.... (I'm not feeling well, so I deserve the sleep)
Posted by: Thomas Warlock at February 17, 2007 07:45 PM (++2bU)
2
I found your blog in my search on the trem: Feminist Manifesto. This linked to your 3/8/06 entry: " My Own Feminist MAnifesto."
In reading it, I would like to just mirror back two of your own quotes for the sake of inquiry. What I ask is; how have these eveloeved for you ove the past year?
The quotes are:
"And really, I have no real knowledge of the modern feminist movement."
"The original aim of the feminist movement was equality. Well, we've got that."
I am curious.
Thanks,
Kerrie
Posted by: Kerrie at February 18, 2007 11:03 AM (GKyMu)
3
Hi Caltechgirl_
The spelling in my first comment reflects a lack of editing. I apologize for those meaning entanglements.
In a simple effort to take responsibility for my own spelling foibles, the corrections were supposed to read:
MAnifesto/ Manifesto...
eveloeved/ evolved...
ove/ over
What do you think of the intentional spelling differences in girl/ girrl?
Thanks again,
Kerrie
Posted by: Kerrie at February 18, 2007 11:17 AM (GKyMu)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
February 15, 2007
Funnies
One of the things I find most useful in recovery from ANY illness is laughter. Especially the drop your teeth, wipe off the keyboard , run for the bathroom kind of laughter you find all over the net.
Today, I bring you three examples of such. And if you don't think it's that funny, you must excuse my sense of humor. It's high on cold medicine.
First up, political humor from Goldstein (too good to NOT steal)
"Q: Why did the Neocon cross the road?"
a. To push over an old woman and take away her healthcare subsidies
b. To beat those Dixie Chicks traitors with a tire iron
c. Because, though he was really hungry for the blood of an innocent brown person, he decided to settle for some McNuggets and a medium Diet Coke
d. THE MONIED JOOOS TOLD HIM TOO!
e. To burn down a Planned Parenthood, deny battered women a voice, and further the aims of the Christofascist Patriarchy
f. all of the above
g. none of the above
h. don't even look at me, you same-sex married homosexual gay fag
And from my dear friend Vanessa, some IVF
TMI.
Finally, photoshop phun from Darleen. Or should that be phrom Darleen?
Posted by: caltechgirl at
11:26 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 205 words, total size 2 kb.
February 14, 2007
Because the night....
If the timestamp on this thing posts even remotely correctly, you'll see that it's well after 1am here on the left coast. Although the insomnia is a constant presence, I was holding it at bay pretty well over the last few weeks courtesy of some sleepytime allergy meds that were helping me get to sleep. Then this sinus thing came along, with Phinneas Gage pain. Literally. I've thought about bashing in the left side of my face more than once in the last week. It has to be less painful than what has been keeping me up at night.
And really, that's why I went to the damn doctor at all. I hate fucking doctors, really. They always want to tell me that they know more than I do about what's wrong with me. Really, ego man? Living in my body doesn't give me any clues? Not to mention that I have TAUGHT doctors before. Nervous system of the head and neck. Just happens to be my specialty.
Either that or they want to shit on me for being fat. Guess what? That's an easy answer, but it's wrong. WRONG. My heart's good, my BP is good, my load-bearing joints are healthy, and frankly, none of that has ANYTHING to do with why my fucking face hurts, thank you very much.
So it's taken me a while to actually go in and see someone. In fact, I hadn't even been to a primary care doc since before I left NC. I've been seeing my EXCELLENT, KICK-ASS rheumo like clockwork for a year, and I've been for my annual girly parts checkup, but I've never had a reason to see anyone else. So I put it off until I couldn't put it off any more.
I actually liked the doc. I liked that she sat and talked to me for a few minutes, that she seemed interested in making sure the RA was getting taken care of, and that she didn't seem to be in a rush to put me out on the street again.
But I digress. Evidently the little troll in my ear decided it doesn't like broad spectrum antibiotic therapy. It is currently throwing a tantrum in my left ear that feels like my teeth are turning to molten lava and my jaw is about to follow suit, and then everything is going to drain out my ear canal. So I'm propped up on the couch, trying to drink warm chai tea and relax enough to do some meditative breathing in addition to the pain pills I took earlier. Hopefully that will put the monster off. It worked this afternoon, but the pain wasn't so intense.
I really don't know how people handled shit like this before good damn drugs.
On the other hand, I think I now know why Van Gogh cut off his ear.
/vent
Posted by: caltechgirl at
01:26 AM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 477 words, total size 3 kb.
1
.... ouch.... get well soon.... and keep denying the urge to lop off your ear!...
Posted by: Eric at February 14, 2007 05:25 AM (NlzwQ)
2
Oh sweetie, I hope you feel better soon.
(((hugs)))
Posted by: wRitErsbLock at February 14, 2007 05:26 AM (+MvHD)
3
Arrrrghhh! Thinking of you... Hope you're feeling better soon.
Posted by: Paul Burgess at February 14, 2007 06:19 AM (7EVyU)
4
Oh man... that bites. I hope you don't have to put up with that much longer!
Posted by: Marie at February 14, 2007 06:23 AM (keaCm)
5
Either that or they want to shit on me for being fat.
California fat, or Wisconsin fat? Weight seems to be the catch-all cause of everything these days, perhaps because the doctors don't have to do anything to treat it?
Phinneas Gage pain
Holy cow! Talk about your splitting headaches.
Posted by: Aaron at February 14, 2007 07:37 AM (fedZm)
6
Okay, my teeth are hurting in sympathy for you. Having had migraines since childhood (cluster migraines around my right eye) I literally can "feel your pain". I hope the antibiotics kick in quick and get rid of the nasties so your head doesn't hurt anymore. {{{gentle hugs}}}
Posted by: Teresa at February 14, 2007 08:07 AM (gsbs5)
7
We had the cement-sinus from hell last week. It got up to a 102+ fever during the Memorial Service for my FIL before subsiding, but the drainage continued and the brain-ache. I started popping guaifenesin tablets (generic mucinex) and that began to relieve the pressure - still getting the snap-crackle-pop in the cranium and ear though, and the taste-buds are shot - beer doesn't taste any good and that's a crime against Spaten. However the 2-buck Chuck Shiraz is ok.
Happy Valentine's Day anyhow.
Posted by: DirtCrashr at February 14, 2007 08:50 AM (VNM5w)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
February 13, 2007
Why am I against the new HPV vaccine?
This is why.
This is the SECOND rotavirus vaccine to cause these problems in young children and infants. In 1999, the Rotashield vaccine caused the same problems.
Until we know FOR SURE that the Gardasil vaccine is safe, it is entirely irresponsible to mandate it for every female child.
Furthermore, Rachel makes a good point here:
"We (the collective) do not want the government to pass laws about our right to murder our unborn children, but we're not up in arms about the government forcing us to inject foreign matter into our little girls' bodies?"
Intellectual Disconnect much?
Posted by: caltechgirl at
06:16 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 112 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I'm opposed to making it mandatory, at least without further study of long term effects, but this statement says much: The agency said the 28 reported cases do not exceed the number that might be expectedNot that it would deter the shysters.
Posted by: Ken S, Fifth String on the Banjo of Life at February 13, 2007 07:13 PM (YElNr)
2
They're touting it as the be all end all of preventing... what is it? Cervical cancer... or something like that in about 30 years if you're one of the few who gets the virus and then has cancer as a consequence.
Once again we have people pushing something to "help the children". This is argument they apply when they want to persuade anyone that they should stop asking questions and just take the damned medicine.
Unfortunately not too many people will question this lest they be thought to be a bigoted right-wing Christian Nazi. To be one of the "cool" parents, you need to just accept this and let them vaccinate.
ARG!!!
Posted by: Teresa at February 13, 2007 10:19 PM (gsbs5)
3
one thing that scares me is that since I'm only the step-mom, if the egg donor decides to use my step-child as a guinea pig, my opinion won't matter.
and my husband seems to be ignoring the topic. he's still trying to cope with his little girl having to wear a bra.
Posted by: wRitErsbLock at February 14, 2007 05:29 AM (+MvHD)
4
In medical cost vs. benefit modeling (which strongly informs national medical public policy making and far too strongly informs the medical policies of HMOs), the most critical component is a value called "cost per life year gained."
If the cost per life year gained is under $50,000, that is generally considered a decent investment by US medical policy makers. If "cost per life year" gained is over $100,000, that is generally considered a wasteful medical policy because that money could surely be put to much better use elsewhere. Yes, this is cruel and heartless to some degree, but wide scale medical cost allocations do need to be made and, more relevantly, are continually made using these cost plus risk vs. benefit analyses. Think HMOs. Now consider why pap smears, blood tests and urine tests aren't recommended every month for everyone. Testing monthly could definitely save more than a few lives, and there is no measurable associated medical risk. But the cost would be astronomical versus the benefit over the entire US population when comparing these monthly tests to other therapies, procedures and medicines.
Now on to GARDASIL. By the time you pay doctors a small fee to inventory and deliver GARDASIL in three doses, you are talking about paying about $500 for this vaccine. And because even in the best case scenario GARDASIL can confer protection against only 70% of cervical cancer cases, GARDASIL cannot ever obsolete the HPV screening test that today is a major component of most US women's annually recommended pap smears. These tests screen for 36 nasty strains of HPV, while GARDASIL confers protection against just four strains of HPV.
Now let's consider GARDASIL's best case scenario at the moment -- about $500 per vaccine, 100% lifetime protection against all four HPV strains (we currently have no evidence for any protection over five years), and no risk of any medical complications for any subset of the population (Merck's GARADSIL studies were too small and short to make this determination for adults, these studies used potentially dangerous alum injections as their "placebo control" and GARDASIL was hardly even tested on little kids). Now, using these best case scenario assumptions for GARDASIL, let's compare the projected situation of a woman who gets a yearly HPV screening test starting at age 18 to a woman who gets a yearly HPV screening test starting at age 18 plus the three GARDASIL injections at age 11 to 12. Even if you include all of the potential medical cost savings from the projected reduction in genital wart and HPV dysplasia removal procedures and expensive cervical cancer procedures, medicines and therapies plus all of the indirect medical costs associated with all these ailments and net all of these savings against GARDASIL's costs, the best case numbers for these analyses come out to well over $200,000 per life year gained -- no matter how far the hopeful pro-GARDASIL assumptions that underpin these projections are tweaked in GARDASIL's favor.
Several studies have been done, and they have been published in several prestigious medical journals:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.290.6.781
http://tinyurl.com/2ovy95
http://tinyurl.com/2tbuma
None of these studies even so much as consider a strategy of GARDASIL plus a regimen of annual HPV screenings starting at age 18 to be worth mentioning (except to note how ridiculously expensive this would be compared to other currently recommended life extending procedures, medicines and therapies) because the cost per life year gained is simply far too high. What these studies instead show is that a regimen of GARDASIL plus delayed (to age 21, 22, 23, 25 or 27) biennial or triennial HPV screening tests may -- depending on what hopeful assumptions about GARDASIL's long term efficacy and risks are used -- hopefully result in a modest cost per life year savings compared to annual HPV screening tests starting at age 18.
If you don't believe me about this, just ask any responsible OB-GYN or medical model expert. Now, why do I think all of this is problematic?
1) Nobody is coming clean (except to the small segment of the US population that understands medical modeling) that the push for widespread mandatory HPV vaccination is based on assuming that we can use the partial protection against cervical cancer that these vaccines hopefully confer for hopefully a long, long time period to back off from recommending annual HPV screening tests starting at age 18 -- in order to save money, not lives.
2) Even in the best case scenario, the net effect is to give billions in tax dollars to Merck so HMOs and PPOs can save billions on HPV screening tests in the future.
3) These studies don't consider any potential costs associated with any potential GARDASIL risks. Even the slightest direct or indirect medical costs associated with any potential GARDASIL risks increase the cost per life year gained TREMENDOUSLY and can even easily change the entire analysis to cost per life year lost. Remember that unlike most medicines and therapies, vaccines are administered to a huge number of otherwise healthy people -- and, at least in this case, 99.99% of whom would never contract cervical cancer even without its protection.
4) These studies don't take in account the fact that better and more regular HPV screening tests have reduced the US cervical cancer rate by about 25% a decade over the last three decades and that there is no reason to believe that this trend would not continue in the future, especially if we used a small portion of the money we are planning on spending on GARDASIL to offer annual HPV screening tests for all low income uninsured US women.
5) The studies assume that any constant cervical cancer death rate (rather than the downward trending cervical cancer death rate we have today) that results in a reduced cost per life year gained equates to sound medical public policy.
As I said before, if any of you don't believe me about this, please simply ask your OB-GYN how the $500 cost of GARDASIL can be justified on a cost per life year gained basis if we don't delay the onset of HPV screening tests and back off from annual HPV screening tests to biennial or triennial HPV screening tests.
The recommendations are already in: http://tinyurl.com/33p9q6
The USPSTF strongly recommends ... beginning screening within 3 years of onset of sexual activity or age 21 (whichever comes first) and screening at least every 3 years ...
Posted by: mhatrw at February 15, 2007 12:57 PM (O39pn)
5
Replica Cartier watches
Cartier is one of the most prestigious brands. Cartier watches became the best seller watch in 2008 and they are very welcomed
by celebrities. Cartier replicas, round, square, rectangular, equipped with mechanical, automatic or quartz movements, all
feature the matchless combination of aesthetics and technical progress. Join in Cartier replica watches, you will find it so
amazing.
Posted by: anthony at April 24, 2009 12:13 AM (pbQca)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
It's official. I am in fact a child.
Sorry for the lack of posting, but now I know for sure why I have been feeling like poo: I have an
ear infection. Courtesy of
someone else's child.
As the doctor said today, one of the crappier things about being treated for RA is that you catch EVERYTHING that comes along because the drugs suppress your immune system. In my case allergies = vulnerable sinuses -> sinus infection -> ear infection.
So excuse me while I
suck my thumb and tug on my left ear until the antibiotics kick in.
Posted by: caltechgirl at
04:51 PM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 105 words, total size 1 kb.
1
See? SEE?
all the bloggers are getting sick!!!! All of us!!!
Global Warming!
Posted by: rsM at February 13, 2007 05:08 PM (DEati)
2
Yuck. Hope the drugs do their thing for you soon!
Posted by: Marie at February 13, 2007 06:02 PM (keaCm)
3
That blows...I'm sorry. Feel better...
Posted by: Sissy at February 13, 2007 06:29 PM (y2kUf)
4
Ouch.
Hope you feel better very soon.
Posted by: Christina at February 13, 2007 07:06 PM (tywUa)
5
Get better soon, dear girl.
Posted by: Ken S, Fifth String on the Banjo of Life at February 13, 2007 07:22 PM (YElNr)
6
Okay, that sucks pond water. Sorry to hear it, I hope you feel better soon. Ear infection... Uck!
Posted by: Teresa at February 13, 2007 10:21 PM (gsbs5)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
47kb generated in CPU 0.0136, elapsed 0.0586 seconds.
75 queries taking 0.0495 seconds, 213 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.