I've been keeping a secret.....
It's not MY secret, so I don't feel so bad. And in fact, in some ways it may be among the worst-kept secrets in blogdom....
Even so I feel pretty honored to have been trusted with it for so long, but now the proverbial cat's officially out of the bag, and I can share it with y'all.
My darling girl Helen is up the duff! (that's p-r-e-g-n-a-n-t for you yanks!)
After many ups and downs, failed rounds of IVF, and many other difficulties, it seems Helen and her man Angus are about to become parents. To twins!
I wish you both (publicly for the first time!!!) all the joy and happiness in the world over the next few months and the double blessing of two healthy babies in October!
These two little angels couldn't have picked a better mum and dad, who are thoughtful, and caring, and deeply committed to each other, and of course, already completely besotted with their very-much-wanted pair of babies.
If you're so inclined, drop by and share in their joy!
2
Heh. I usually go down my blogroll in alphabetical order, which means that I could have seen Helen's post before your's. Doesn't matter though, as it's excellent news.
Posted by: physics geek at May 01, 2007 09:59 AM (MT22W)
3
The so courageous Helen deserves ALL the happiness in the world. And I know she knows I wish it for her and her family.
Posted by: Margi at April 30, 2007 04:27 PM (pOMkc)
12
It is a very nice home! I'm sure it will be even more beautiful once you get your hands on it!! Are you planning on keeping the wall colors the same? I'm curious...what's your decorating style??
WTF???
One of my favorite things to do, sportswise, is sit down and watch the first round of the NFL draft. I love college football, and I know quite a bit about it, and it's fun to watch the scheming and the trading and the guessing. It's like a chess match with overfed idiots calling the shots.
Yet every year it seems something ALWAYS prevents me from watching. This year, it's a home inspection scheduled for 9 AM tomorrow (tentatively.... I'm guessing the current owners won't be happy about that).
Oh well. Thank Goodness for TiVo. I'll Tivo the first bit and watch the rest LIVE. :-)
In other sports news, we went to our first Dodgers game of the year last night, Joe Beimel sucks, and we lost, but I brought home a new friend.
Posted by: Dave J at April 27, 2007 06:39 PM (PEbS4)
3
Well, a "Nomah" bobble head is pretty cool, but you may now officially envy me because we have one of these.
I mean, really. Nomar's career will end but a Dodger Dog is forever.
Of course, I still envy you because we haven't been to the hallowed grounds of Dodger Stadium for some time now, though Daughter Number One has been there recently.
4
I'm not going to be able to watch it either, but I'm looking for three from my team to be drafted in the first round, including maybe the number one pick. We'll see, I guess.
Posted by: Dash at April 27, 2007 07:42 PM (d3xGU)
Posted by: Thomas Warlock at April 27, 2007 09:34 PM (77Jve)
6
Maybe on TiVo its bearable, but otherwise, the NFL draft?!?!? I'm a pretty devout sports fan, but I don't know if I could sit there for hours watching that thing-- though I suppose it's still better than watching the anoerixic-capades also known as gymnastics.
Then again, if your only other option is the Dodgers, maybe I can understand....
Posted by: Tony Iovino at April 30, 2007 06:44 AM (85Zmb)
I know I haven't posted about it much, but that's because it has been BEYOND stressful, including some nasty negotiations, 7 counteroffers, and a lot of threats to walk away from the deal.
Here's hoping the rest of the deal goes smoother than the contract negotiations.
1
I had a realtor tell me once that its a good deal when everyone thinks they got screwed. The seller thinks they sold too low, the buyer thinks they paid too much. I'd think it would be if everyone was happy, but... eh, that's the flip side.
Congrats on the house!
Posted by: wRitErsbLock at April 26, 2007 05:22 AM (+MvHD)
3
I'm sorry you had such a horrid time of it. You know the old show business saying... bad dress rehearsal, great performance. Let's hope the same holds true here... bad negotiations, great move in.
Posted by: Teresa at April 26, 2007 07:27 AM (gsbs5)
Posted by: Christina at April 26, 2007 11:19 AM (z2S93)
5
Congratulations!
Once you get in there and put your mark on the place, I'm sure you will love it!
Posted by: Phoenix at April 26, 2007 12:36 PM (4N2f4)
6
Now that I've gotten into Real Estate, I know how stressful those situations can be. What you need is a professional agent to take the pressure off, a reliable lending company to not screw things up, and a decent sized bottle of gin to have fun through it all. ;^)
Posted by: Paladin at April 26, 2007 01:45 PM (1/sUx)
Posted by: Paladin at April 26, 2007 01:45 PM (1/sUx)
8
Yay! I was getting tired of walking around with all my fingers and toes crossed. (Although I'll keep them crossed a little longer if you think it will help!)
Congratulations!
Posted by: Mrs. Who at April 26, 2007 06:17 PM (9FXen)
Keeping up with the Memers
Velocidude recently posted a cartoon short that was one of his favorites as a kid.
So I tried to find mine, but alas, it is NOT available on the web. Ugh.
You see, I was always a Merrie Melodies gal. Not so big on the Bugs Bunny and pals, but I loved the Mel Blanc shorts. My all time favorite is a bit from 1953 called "A Sheep in the Deep" starring Sam Sheepdog and Ralph Wolf, who many of you will recognize a an early version of Foghorn Leghorn's nemesis George P. Dog and Wile E. Coyote.
If you have never seen any of the series, the premise is that Sam and Ralph are buddies, except at work, where the sheepdog's job is to keep the wolf away from the sheep, and the wolf's job is to catch them. Sam and Ralph clock in and clock out every day.
And to appease those of you who MUST have a video, my favorite of the modern Warner Bros. cartoons. Pinky and the Brain present "The Parts of the Brain:"
For the curious, this little ditty was actually part of my PhD thesis talk. No, really.
1
I remember when Pinky and the Brain came out, but I never had time to watch it. Darling daughter would've been a junior in high school, young son would have been in 6th grade when it started - things never slowed down from there... although I think my son watched it.
As for Sam and Ralph... I LOVED them. They were a riot.
Posted by: Teresa at April 25, 2007 03:18 PM (gsbs5)
2
I LOVE Sam and Ralph! Especially when they clock out and Ralph is usually bandaged up.
3
I have pinky and the brain stuffed dolls, for a long time I had the sounds for all my windows sounds and as a screen saver. I knew all the words to the song. I loved that show.
Posted by: vw bug at April 25, 2007 04:49 PM (FPOeI)
4
Ralph was just like Wile E. Coyote. He never won. But the Sam n Ralph cartoons were a great riff on corporate organization man America.
Posted by: Velociman at April 25, 2007 08:39 PM (2+Qms)
Armenian Martyrs' Day
April 24th is the day we remember the victims of a forgotten genocide.
On April 24, 1915, turkish soldiers arrested 250 Armenians in the first of hundreds of raids designed to wipe out the Armenian population of turkey.
Armenian villages were rousted one by one, and the men ordered to leave at once and serve the turkish army. Boys as young as 9 or 10, and men as old as 70. Many never made that far, as turkish soldiers often took these "new recruits" not to the army camps but out to the woods, where they were summarily executed. The women and girls, thus undefended, were easy prey for the turkish soldiers.
Those who remained behind were forced from their lands, homes, and belongings, and force-marched to "settlement camps" in remote areas. Many died along the way from exhaustion, starvation, and exposure to the elements. According to French scholars Joel Kotek and Pierre Rigoulot, there were up to 25 such camps.
But the Armenian's plight was nowhere near as unknown, even in that day, as it is now. Despite the lack of internet, video cameras, and TV screens, in 1915 the plight of the Armenians was a worldwide topic of discussion. US Consular officials, as early as July of 1915, were concerned enough to beg the US government to step in.
(click to enlarge)
No less than Winston Churchill, then Britain's First Lord of the Admiralty noted, "the clearance of race from Asia Minor was about as complete as such an act could be...There is no reason to doubt that that this crime was planned and executed for political reasons. The opportunity presented itself for clearing Turkish soil of a Christian race opposed to all Turkish ambitions." And he was then in the midst of the "war to end all wars" against Germany!
During 1915, the New York Times paper published 145 articles about the mass murder of the Armenian people, describing the massacre as "systematic, "authorized" and "organized by the government." In 1918, Theodore Roosevelt called it "the greatest crime of the war."
But today, no one even knows it happened
Denialists of all stripes, from US and EU officials who find turkey's past "annoying", to the turks themselves who believe such raids were justified to "pick up deserters" (yeah, little old men, deserters. right.) have managed to decrease the general public's awareness of these atrocities. But they happened. There was no Photoshop in 1915. All of the horrible pictures you see here are real.
Despite missions from the US and UK, Austria, France, and others, the plight of the Armenians faded off the radar screen as war in Europe intensified.
Looks a lot like Germany around 1942, huh?
In fact, Adolf Hitler said of the Armenian Genocide: "Who, after all, speaks today of the annihilation of the Armenians?"as his justification for the atrocities carried out on the Jews and others during the Nazi's reign over Germany.
We did not forget. We do not forget. We will always remember.
My previous remembrances here. This stays on top all day.
1
I remember - although I didn't know there was a special day of remembrance.
Posted by: Teresa at April 24, 2007 02:54 PM (gsbs5)
2
Until recently, this awful event was only 'vaguely' in my realm of knowledge. Thank you for making it more than a footnote. Evil simply does not go away if we ignore it or pretend it didn't happen. We must never forget, or it will happen again (as history has shown).
Posted by: Mrs. Who at April 24, 2007 03:38 PM (9FXen)
3
Let me echo Mrs. Who's sentiments . . .thank you for the education.
Posted by: Anita at April 25, 2007 04:41 AM (jjxde)
4
I'd never heard of it until I was in college. In 1975 I spent the weekend with a good friend of mine, Armenian. His family showed me the photo albums of all his relatives, perished. Only his maternal grandparents escaped to America. They were quite passionate about the subject, naturally.
Posted by: Velociman at April 25, 2007 06:59 AM (LyOUH)
Tell that to my grandparents. Tell that to my Dad's stepmother, who saved her seven children by WALKING from the mountains of Turkey all the way to Beirut, dressed as an Arab widow. WALKING. With seven children. Hundreds of miles on dirt roads with no shoes, cutting across country to avoid the soldiers. Stopping and doing sewing jobs for money whenever they could.
You pigs say that 4 million Turks died? Could that be because you're counting the Armenians born in Turkey?
Whole villages, rousted from their beds in the middle of the night. All of the men and boys made to line up in the town square, and then SHOT one by one. The women and girls raped by turkish soldiers. The survivors starved to death slowly.
I'll have more on this on April 24, Armenian Martyr's day. Until then I leave you with the words Adolf Hitler used to justify the holocaust:
"Who, after all, speaks today of the annihilation of the Armenians?"
1
Thank you for helping me to remember this. I'm looking forward to your post on the 24th.
Posted by: Mrs. Who at April 22, 2007 05:47 PM (YU6UF)
2
What a quote. It's only one of the most oft-spoken-of genocides in history, ever. Hitler was, inarguably, the biggest dooooshbag, ever...the type of schmuck who makes me want to find him and dig his sorry Nazi ass up just to kill him all over again.
Posted by: Erica at April 22, 2007 07:24 PM (n1ABe)
1
I certainly hope it is going well.
Hang tough.
; )
Posted by: Christina at April 20, 2007 06:53 AM (d3xGU)
2
You're in my thoughts, as always. You have my number...feel free to call if you need a gentle shoulder. Or, if you're just busy, I wish you rest and relaxation.
Say hi to DH for me. And the sweet pup, too...
((hugs))
Suppose that every day, ten men go out for beer and the bill for all
ten comes to $100. If they paid their bill the way we pay our taxes, it
would go something like this:
The first four men (the poorest) would pay nothing.
The fifth would pay $1.
The sixth would pay $3.
The seventh would pay $7.
The eighth would pay $12.
The ninth would pay $18.
The tenth man (the richest) would pay $59.
So, that's what they decided to do.
The ten men drank in the bar every day and seemed quite happy with
the arrangement, until on day, the owner threw them a curve. "Since you
are all such good customers," he said, "I'm going to reduce the cost of
your daily beer by $20."Drinks for the ten now cost just $80.
The group still wanted to pay their bill the way we pay our taxes so
the first four men were unaffected. They would still drink for free.
But what about the other six men --- the paying customers? How could
they divide the $20 windfall so that everyone would get his 'fair
share?' They realized that $20 divided by six is $3.33. But if they
subtracted that from everybody's share, then the fifth man and the
sixth man would each end up being paid to drink his beer.So, the bar
owner suggested that it would be fair to reduce each man's bill by
roughly the same amount, and he proceeded to work out the amounts each
should pay. And so:
The fifth man, like the first four, now paid nothing (100% savings).
The sixth now paid $2 instead of $3 (33%savings).
The seventh now pay $5 instead of $7 (28%savings).
The eighth now paid $9 instead of $12 (25% savings).
The ninth now paid $14 instead of $18 (22% savings).
The tenth now paid $49 instead of $59 (16% savings).
Each of the six was better off than before. And the first four
continued to drink for free. But once outside the restaurant, the men
began to compare their savings. "I only got a dollar out of the
$20,"declared the sixth man. He pointed to the tenth man," but he got
$10!"
"Yeah, that's right," exclaimed the fifth man. "I only saved a dollar, too.
It's unfair that he got ten times more than I!"
"That's true!!" shouted the seventh man. "Why should he get $10 back when I got only two? The wealthy get all the breaks!"
"Wait a minute," yelled the first four men in unison. "We didn't get anything at all. The system exploits the poor!"
The nine men surrounded the tenth and beat him up. The next night
the tenth man didn't show up for drinks, so the nine sat down and had
beers without him. But when it came time to pay the bill, they
discovered something important. They didn't have enough money between
all of them for even half of the bill!
And that, boys and girls, journalists and college professors, is how
our tax system works. The people who pay the highest taxes get the most
benefit from a tax reduction. Tax them too much, attack them for being
wealthy, and they just may not show up anymore. In fact, they might
start drinking overseas where the atmosphere is somewhat friendlier.
For those who understand, no explanation is needed. For those who do not understand, no explanation is possible.
1
It's one of my favorite parables that comes around every tax season. Too bad too few take notice of it.
Posted by: Teresa at April 17, 2007 08:33 PM (gsbs5)
2
Oh, I've never heard this one before, but I love it! It does always crack me up when people complain that the tax breaks go to the wealthy. Uh yeah, the tax breaks would actually go to the people who pay the taxes. What a surprise . . .and you know, it wouldn't be so bad if the money wasn't going to support things like train museums and farm subsidies. Don't get me started.
Posted by: Anita at April 18, 2007 03:55 AM (jjxde)
3
I loved that post at Denny's! I had seen something similar before... but it is perfect right now.
Posted by: vw bug at April 18, 2007 05:17 AM (IwPzd)
4
Very cool. I'll add a link in my annual anti-Tax Day post.
Posted by: physics geek at April 18, 2007 11:13 AM (KqeHJ)
Posted by: Richmond at April 18, 2007 12:54 PM (e8QFP)
6
An old "joke" but a great one-- and the Ayn Randesque ending, where the rich go away is the topper!
In the real world, of course, the "rich" guy puts his money into tax-free or off-shore accounts and settle in at around #5's share-- to a great deal of teeth-gnashing!
Posted by: Tony Iovino at April 22, 2007 09:50 AM (85Zmb)
Their counteroffer was $10,000 over asking plus lots of cash up front, in other words, F**K OFF, we don't want to sell to you. Or anyone else, evidently.
1
That really sucks.
Seem to be a lot of folks lately who don't have a realistic idea what their property is actually worth. It's not the same market it was a couple of years ago almost anywhere...
Idjits.
2
The market is what people think it is.... Just wait 3 months, and if it's still on the market, make an offer for 10 grand less than what you offered the first time.
If they wanted full highest price, they should of sold last year, not be trying to sell now.
Posted by: Bill at April 14, 2007 04:17 PM (oWOkB)
3
About 10 years ago, my boss had some next door neighbors who had their house on the market for 5 years!!! I could never figure out why they wanted it on the market or why the realtor didn't just drop them as a client.
The neighborhood is very pricey - they wanted an offer with NO contingencies! I couldn't believe it. I know that's why it never sold. The chances of someone having the cash in hand, walking up and buying the place were about nil.
Some people shouldn't have their house on the market. Period!
Posted by: Teresa at April 14, 2007 05:06 PM (gsbs5)
4
I suspect in time... they'll wish they'd taken your offer. But by then you'll have found something you like and have made your own and you will quietly laugh to yourself that you got the last laugh. Well... at least I would.
5
10K over the asking price?!?! WTF? I take it the house hasn't been on the market for long... Perhaps this one wasn't meant to be. In that case, there's an even better one out there for you!
Posted by: Marie at April 16, 2007 07:32 AM (ocfI9)
6
A pox on them I say! A pox!!
It just wasn't your house - something better will come along.
Posted by: Richmond at April 16, 2007 11:52 AM (e8QFP)
7
You need revenge...just go pour a cupful of pool chemicals on their lawn. It will create a brown spot...which they will water, thus spreading the 'brown' spot even further. When it's really spread out, and they're wanting to move for fighting it, THEN you go in and make the offer. For what you want. And tell them to resod or knock a few thousand more off for you to 'fix' it yourself.
Posted by: Mrs. Who at April 17, 2007 07:22 PM (9FXen)
Would that more journalists saw things this way
ESPN.com's Jemele Hill apologizes to the Duke Lacrosse players wrongfully accused of rape (it's a long passage, but well worth the time and bandwidth):
My being a black woman, my knowing too many athletes who treat women like items to be purchased in a vending machine, and my witnessing enough athlete rape trials where accusers are overwhelmed by their fame and fortune -- it all tainted my perception and made me doubt your innocence.
I feel stupid now.
I could blame Durham County district attorney Mike Nifong, but that would be too easy. Oh, he's a lout, no doubt. He played upon the emotions of a community and its long-held hostilities, and put his reelection bid above morality and common sense. He played all of us and should be punished with nothing less than disbarment.
I could blame Jesse Jackson, who I have hoped for years would disappear to a faraway land where CNN wouldn't follow. As usual, Jesse showed up and showed out. He incited the masses and then left everyone else to sort out the wreckage. And if Jesse wants to gain an ounce of the credibility he no longer has, he would find the nearest camera -- and we know he's good at that -- and express sorrow with all the sincerity he can muster. But the day Jesse apologizes for causing a scene is the day Rosie O'Donnell wears a muzzle.
But if there is anything to be learned from Don Imus' fall, it's that real apologies are never accompanied by rationalizations.
So to Reade Seligmann, Collin Finnerty and David Evans, the three Duke lacrosse players whose lives were mangled by an unsupported rape accusation, I say two of the hardest words in the English language:
I'm sorry.
It's not enough, and I won't pretend that it is. For the last year, your lives and those of your families have been more difficult than any of us can possibly imagine. I'll never know what it was like walking around normal society labeled a rapist. I'll never know what it's like to lose everything -- your school, your program and your life -- because of one unproven accusation.
You deserve all of that back and then some, but unfortunately, you won't get it. You have every right to not trust anyone and think less of people. Duke University abandoned you. An overzealous prosecutor tormented you. A community, a nation, didn't believe you. Journalists everywhere, sensing ratings and salivating over the salaciousness of black strippers and white athletes, chose to keep you under attack.
Not that this is a contest to see who was wronged the most, but the Rutgers women's basketball team at least received justice, because Imus was suspended and dropped by MSNBC, which simulcasts his morning show. Plenty of people are outraged on their behalf.
But who is outraged on your behalf? What justice will you receive? Will the same networks that willingly aided in destroying your reputations now give you airtime to vent your frustrations? Will Jesse Jackson now offer the three of you a free scholarship like he did the "victim," since he helped assist in your battered reputation?
Maybe the only modicum of fairness you have received is that the News & Observer in Raleigh decided to print the name of your accuser. I don't normally advocate that the names of alleged victims be printed, but it feels right in this instance.
I know I'd certainly like to ask your accuser a few questions, even though she stood by her story as North Carolina's attorney general vehemently proclaimed your innocence. Does she understand she has tanked not only her credibility, but that of other women, too? Does she understand the next time a woman comes forward with an allegation this serious, all of our minds will scroll back to this case, and we will be less inclined to believe her? Does she know women with legitimate sexual-assault complaints will look at this furor and decide silence is best?
I can't deny that your race, gender and class have everything to do with how you were treated then and how you are treated now. Some people believe white men are exempt from sympathy and incapable of being maligned, so they will not swallow their pride and offer you the decency you should have received in the first place. Yes, you made an unwise decision to entertain strippers at a residence, but that just makes you guilty of being like 90 percent of college males.
Bravo to Ms. Hill, who put politics and BS aside in the face of what is right, and my best wishes to these three young men, who have learned a very painful lesson about race, class, and sex in this country. I hope that they are able to pick up where they left off, and come to a place where people don't know their names except based on their accomplishments and kindnesses.
1
"Bravo to Ms. Hill, who put politics and BS aside in the face of what is right, and my best wishes to these three young men, who have learned a very painful lesson about race, class, and sex in this country. I hope that they are able to pick up where they left off, and come to a place where people don't know their names except based on their accomplishments and kindnesses."
Well said. And kudos to Ms. Hill, for addressing the issues most wouldn't. I especially respected her for addressing actual victims who might choose silence out of fear. That happens too often already and our media isn't doing it's job (not that they ever have, really). Thank you, CTG, for doing the job that they chose not to, and for giving a voice to the REAL victims in this case.
2
Great post and great link. There is such a stark contrast between the uproar over the Imus/Rutgers incident and the lack of it over what these young men had to endure. That alone makes me stop and ponder what is really wrong with our society.
Here from Theresa's!
Posted by: Karin at April 14, 2007 10:16 AM (wwK1H)
3
I'm glad she seems to finally get it and that she apologized. The fact that she compares the more than year long torture these young men have endured (and the continuing stigma that will follow them the rest of their lives - because there are so many who will always consider them to be guilty) with the fairly innocuous dissing of the Rutgers women's basketball team, is troubling. (talk about moral equivalence!)
Everyone raise their hand who thinks that the idiot Imus has labeled these women for life! (yeah, I don't think so either)
I must say that on reading the entire thing, I kept hearing an "Archie Bunker" accent. Honestly, if a white person had written this, they would be crucified for being an over the top extreme bigot and would most certainly lose their "journalist" job.
So, I'm conflicted. I do believe her apology is sincere though and that's something I can seldom if ever say about other liberals. It's a start.
Posted by: Teresa at April 14, 2007 11:24 AM (gsbs5)
4
Wow - that was a great read. Thanks for sharing!
Posted by: Gretchen at April 19, 2007 09:40 PM (Tpvct)
A Literary Loss
Kurt Vonnegut died today at the age of 84. You might be surprised to find me a Vonnegut fan, given his politics, but he had a GENIUS way with words.
Breakfast of Champions was the first Vonnegut I read. In high school. In between giggling at his picture of an a$$hole....
I discovered the first REALLY SMART book I ever read. Admittedly it took me a couple of trips through before I really got it.
And I was hooked. Over the years, I've put a lot of Vonnegut between my ears, including many of the lesser known books, especially Hocus Pocus, which gave me one of my favorite phrases ever, "When the Excrement Hit the Air Conditioning".... And yes, he capitalized it just like that.
His sense of the euphemism was unmatched, and he used them like metaphors. In a world of fumbling double entendre and pathetic punnery, his phrases stand out for their lack of self-importance.
My favorite of his works, though, was his last novel, Timequake, a book I love so dearly that I have thumb tabbed a number of quotes.
I have two favorite passages, a short one I will share with you here, and a longer bit below the jump (profanity below the jump, BTW).
Vonnegut's advice to the physicist Leo Seren, who apologized for participating in the atomic bomb production:
"Somebody should have told him that being a physicist on a planet where the smartest animals hate being alive so much means never having to say you're sorry."
Science and Belief, Not Incompatible
As you all know, I am a scientist. Most of my friends are scientists, my colleagues are scientists, and I have had the privilege of meeting many of the world's deepest and most renowned scientific thinkers.
And again and again, I am struck by the depth of faith to be found in the scientific community. While laypeople bitch and moan over Evolution, Creation, and Intelligent Design, many scientists simply don't see the incongruity.
The more you know about the amazing intricacies of the world around us, the easier it is to believe in an omniscient supreme being as designer and creator. It's all just so smart you know?
Anyway, the point of this post is to share with you a bit of this piece from CNN, where Dr. Francis Collins, Director of the Human Genome Project at NIH, discusses his faith and how one can be a scientist AND a believer.
So, some have asked, doesn't your brain explode? Can you both pursue an understanding of how life works using the tools of genetics and molecular biology, and worship a creator God? Aren't evolution and faith in God incompatible? Can a scientist believe in miracles like the resurrection?
Actually, I find no conflict here, and neither apparently do the 40 percent of working scientists who claim to be believers. Yes, evolution by descent from a common ancestor is clearly true. If there was any lingering doubt about the evidence from the fossil record, the study of DNA provides the strongest possible proof of our relatedness to all other living things.
But why couldn't this be God's plan for creation? True, this is incompatible with an ultra-literal interpretation of Genesis, but long before Darwin, there were many thoughtful interpreters like St. Augustine, who found it impossible to be exactly sure what the meaning of that amazing creation story was supposed to be. So attaching oneself to such literal interpretations in the face of compelling scientific evidence pointing to the ancient age of Earth and the relatedness of living things by evolution seems neither wise nor necessary for the believer.
I have found there is a wonderful harmony in the complementary truths of science and faith. The God of the Bible is also the God of the genome. God can be found in the cathedral or in the laboratory. By investigating God's majestic and awesome creation, science can actually be a means of worship.
That's absolutely how I feel, and I know many others who feel the same way. Science and Faith go hand in hand. Science is the discovery of the majesty of our world, and revealing the wonder of the universe gives glory to its author.
Have a Blessed Easter, Passover, or whatever you choose to celebrate this weekend!
Posted by: Marianne at April 08, 2007 09:01 PM (vEfFN)
5
I want to thank you for your thoughtful comments here. Having attended the most prestigious institutions for my undergrad and medical school, and having read works of the great current scientists, cosmologists, molecular biologists, quantum physicists, I have concluded everything you have stated. The historic person of Jesus Christ could have performed miracles, could be a visible part of the whole trinity (think the sphere which intersected the plane in Abbott's Flatland - was Christ the circle? Was the Father the part of the sphere above the plane? Was the Holy Spirit the part below the plane?) and, most importantly, have risen from the dead and appear to hundreds of eyewitnesses, could have been there in the beginning, etc. if there are more dimensions than our 3 (4), up to 11 as proposed by Witten's M-theory? Good enough for me. The acceptance of these other dimensions releases us from the need to "see", "touch", or experiment upon God. There are extra-dimensional entities to which our scientific method just can't apply (gasp!), and we have appreciated this fact as we reach the limits of our abilities to explore (think proving the Uncertainty Principle, how a deterministic model of the universe in which entropy is becoming maximal can't explain how in our corner the complexity of life is incredible!). Thanks again, and I look forward to reading other comments!!
Posted by: turbostar at April 08, 2007 10:58 PM (yIj6K)
6
Thank you. Thank you. Caltechgirl, I only wish that I could have written that blog post. Very well put.
And Dr. Collins is 100% spot on about Augustine. One need only read the last several books of Augustine's Confessions, his search for God in the categories of memory, time and eternity, form and matter, and creation.
From a somewhat different angle, Thomas Aquinas also concluded that language regarding creation is analogical language— remember Aquinas and the analogia entis, the analogy of being, which is referential, but neither literal nor figurative nor any combination of literal and figurative.
I take a special interest in these matters, since before I became a Presbyterian minister, I was originally aimed to become a mathematician.
BTW, a belated Happy Easter!
Posted by: Paul Burgess at April 09, 2007 05:54 AM (7EVyU)
7
And in math, most of my friends and colleagues were in math, physics, or engineering. Amazing how many of them, I remember, saw the matter in much the same light as you lay out here.
BTW, I managed to comment this time without acquiring a new blog. You may recall, attempting to comment on one of your posts about faith and science was how I originally (and rather accidentally) acquired a blog of my own, way back when... :-)
Posted by: Paul Burgess at April 09, 2007 06:05 AM (7EVyU)
8
Heck, I'm an atheist, and I've long believed the same thing (about the compatibility of science and belief in God, that is).
(It helps having been raised as a non-believer, I think, rather than the god-hating types who were brought up as believers and then had to go to extremes as a form of rejection.
I have no dog in the fight, so I don't have any emotional investment.)
Posted by: Sigivald at April 09, 2007 03:58 PM (4JnZM)
9
Yeah, personally I'm agnostic, but I never understood the argument that it was either one or the either. It always seemed very apples and oranges to me.
Posted by: silvermine at April 09, 2007 07:10 PM (zqzYV)
10
Excellent post-- reminds me of the einstein quote:
"Buddhism has the characteristics of what would be expected in a cosmic religion for the future: It transcends a personal God, avoids dogmas and theology; it covers both the natural and spritual; and it is based on a religious sense aspiring from the experience of all things, natural and spiritual, as a meaningful unity. -Albert Einstein
I've often told my daughters that chemistry is the study of things; biology is the study of life; and physics is the study of God.
Posted by: Tony Iovino at April 10, 2007 05:12 PM (85Zmb)
11
Well, of course Dr. Collins is dead on. He articulates it so much better than I can though. Thanks for posting it, I hadn't seen it.
Posted by: Teresa at April 10, 2007 07:27 PM (gsbs5)
12
I'm still playing catch up on my blog reading...
I LOVE this post and will have my husband, the atheist, read it. For some reason he sees a disparity between science and faith. Not being a person of science, I've never had that particular problem.
Thank you for posting this!!
13
I've always felt like you but couldn't have expressed it the way you did. Thank you!
(Faith and reason are like a pair of shoes...you can get a lot further with both than with just one or the other.)
Posted by: Mrs. Who at April 11, 2007 03:22 PM (9FXen)
14
You have no idea how long I've wanted to write this post myself.
Of course, there are those who believe in a literal interpretation of the bible. They're nearly unreachable, of course. I've tried to question these types on the editorial process.
It seems to me that unless a bible turns up, written in flaming letters, it was written by a human. There's bound to be interpretation in there somewhere.
Posted by: Aaron at April 13, 2007 08:59 PM (SbW5B)