March 12, 2007
Since all the cool kids are doing it....
Shamelessly copied from
Rachel and
Mandy.....

Create your own Friend Quiz hereTake the quiz
here! I can't wait to see how well you do! I made some of the questions hard and some easy on purpose!
Posted by: caltechgirl at
11:37 PM
| Comments (10)
| Add Comment
Post contains 51 words, total size 1 kb.
1
**hangs head in shame**
it's been a long time since i read your eleventy-one things. time to re-read.
Posted by: wRitErsbLock at March 13, 2007 04:17 AM (+MvHD)
2
I too must re-read . . .
Posted by: oddybobo at March 13, 2007 05:05 AM (mZfwW)
3
SM--- That's R.. SM
Not bad for only a few minutes of conversation...
I observe peeps.
Posted by: rsm at March 13, 2007 05:11 AM (VeRHk)
4
UGH! Can I do a re-take?
I'm gonna have to read you're eleventy-one things again too! =/
Posted by: Amanda at March 13, 2007 07:13 AM (breLv)
5
OK. That was dang hard.
Posted by: Marie at March 13, 2007 08:01 AM (ocfI9)
6
...but fun! I'll have to waste some time creating one of these later.
Posted by: Marie at March 13, 2007 08:02 AM (ocfI9)
7
I'm scared to take it...
Posted by: Richmond at March 13, 2007 10:07 AM (e8QFP)
8
dang, I didn't think it was THAT hard....
Posted by: caltechgirl at March 13, 2007 10:10 AM (r0kgl)
9
I only got 2 right! Wow, we should hang out more :-P
Posted by: Sissy at March 13, 2007 06:09 PM (y2kUf)
10
Of course you don't think it's that hard...you know all the answers! =P
Posted by: Amanda at March 14, 2007 08:29 AM (breLv)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
One more...
Here's the
EU game! Slightly less challenging, there are only 27 in 10 minutes!
h/t
BethC
Posted by: caltechgirl at
09:52 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 19 words, total size 1 kb.
1
oh my goodness. Shame on me.
I keep having to close it after only 4 minutes because I'm at work, but so far I've only come up with 14 countries. And that about maxes out my geographical knowledge.
I imagine if I had a map in front of me, though, that I could probably label the countries correctly.
Eventually I'll have 10 uninterrupted minutes to go take that test. And, no, I won't cheat while I'm waiting! I have work to do. Dammit.
Posted by: wRitErsbLock at March 13, 2007 10:02 AM (+MvHD)
2
BTW, yes, I did pass this one. 2:44 left.
Posted by: caltechgirl at March 13, 2007 10:11 AM (r0kgl)
3
Okay, time just ran out. I missed 8. Of those 8, I have never even heard of 2 of them!
Geography never was my subject.
You forgot:Bulgaria, Cyprus, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, Slovenia
Posted by: wRitErsbLock at March 13, 2007 10:20 AM (+MvHD)
4
hehehehehe I'm just a Euro-Geek ;-)
05:15
0 states remain
Named so far:
Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Cyprus, Czech Republic,
Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany,
Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Latvia,
Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Poland,
Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain,
Sweden, United Kingdom,
Posted by: V5 at March 13, 2007 04:16 PM (bP+3v)
5
Cyprus and Malta were the tough ones for me to remember. I had about eight minutes left to spend trying to figure out those two.
Of course, when I lived in Brussels they had just added Sweden, Finland and Austria, and not admitted any of the former communist countries yet, but for someone with an actual graduate certificate in EU Legal Practice, I'd still say it's an embarassaing performance on my part.
Posted by: Dave J at March 14, 2007 06:37 PM (PEbS4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
More Geekery!
Go
here, and see how many of the 50 United States you can name in 10:00.
I made it with 4:33 left. Poor Iowa. Iowa was last.
h/t
Jay
Posted by: caltechgirl at
01:41 PM
| Comments (12)
| Add Comment
Post contains 31 words, total size 1 kb.
1
5:34 left, and Delaware was the one the eluded me.
Posted by: Contagion at March 12, 2007 02:32 PM (T4WRc)
2
Got 'em all, but I got Nebraska and Kansas in just under the wire.
Posted by: Jim - PRS at March 12, 2007 04:31 PM (a6/Kb)
3
I ran out of time trying to come up with Nebraska. I stared for five minutes trying to come up with Nebraska.
Posted by: wRitErsbLock at March 12, 2007 04:46 PM (0Pi1o)
4
7:43 left. No one said it was a typing test. and Massachusetts stumped me for a little bit in spelling.
I had them in alphabetical order, too.
(It's only because I memorized the order in fifth grade when I figured out my teachers always put the state capitals in order of the states on the tests...)
Who pwn5 whom now?!!!11!!
Posted by: Rsm at March 13, 2007 05:18 AM (VeRHk)
5
I got them with 5:50 to spare
Posted by: oddybobo at March 13, 2007 05:31 AM (mZfwW)
6
I drew a blank with a little over five minutes left and missed 6. And I kept going over and over the song in my head and just could.not.do.it.
Must be the results of pregnancy brain. =(
Posted by: Amanda at March 13, 2007 07:31 AM (breLv)
7
Song?! What's the song?
I realized just how visual I am... I was stuck on 5 because I didn't visualize them on the map in my head!
Posted by: Marie at March 13, 2007 10:03 AM (ocfI9)
8
The 50 states, sung by Yakko Warner (Animaniacs).
Right?
Posted by: caltechgirl at March 13, 2007 10:12 AM (r0kgl)
9
5:01, and I spent at least a minute trying to remember Nevada. I thought I was missing something in the northeast.
Posted by: Matt at March 13, 2007 10:23 AM (FPM2T)
10
caltechgirl:
There's an older song I learned in the mid-70s when I was in first grade. Unfortunately, It's been so long I don't remember it exactly. Mostly it's the state names in alphabetical order, but I think the song throws a few out of order to match the meter or rhyme at some points.
Oh, and I learned it in Ohio so one of the last lines is "...and OHIO IS THE BESSST!!" or similar. I wonder if it changed from state to state.
Posted by: Patrick Chester at March 13, 2007 02:21 PM (MKaa5)
11
Since you mentioned Iowa upfront I added it first LOL
I can remember at one time when we had to do this in under 5 minutes, alphabetically, for school.
Sadly I needed a little over 9 minutes to remember them all. *SIGH* Getting old I guess. ;-)
Posted by: V5 at March 13, 2007 04:27 PM (bP+3v)
12
Song: there's also this one that I learned in sixth grade:
Fifty Nifty United States
Fifty nifty united states
from thirteen original colonies
Fifty nifty stars in the flag
that billow so beautifully in the breeze.
Each individual state
Contributes a quality that is great
Each individual state
Deserves a bow... Let's salute them now
Fifty nifty united States
from thirteen original colonies
shout 'em scout 'em tell all about 'em
One by one 'til we've given a day to every state
In the USA
In the USA
In the USA...
Alabama, Alaska Arizona Arkansas, Califo....
you get the idea.
Posted by: rSM at March 15, 2007 06:35 PM (asw+D)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
March 09, 2007
Two Myths
Shamelessly stolen from
Da' Mox:
A Myth about LiberalsI've noticed a lot of name calling going on lately. But because I am a scientist, I did some research.
Liberals are not all pussies. I discovered that liberals do indeed have penises. But only the women.
A Myth about RepublicansAll Republicans want to screw the poor.
This commonly held belief is absolutely untrue. The Right is very picky about sexual partners, they much prefer to screw (many times a night) other like-minded rich people of the opposite gender.
Posted by: caltechgirl at
10:28 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 87 words, total size 1 kb.
F*ck it. here's some more
You Are an Irish Coffee
|
 At your best, you are: wild, spontaneous, and outgoing
At your worst, you are: too extreme and reckless
You drink coffee when: you want to keep drinking booze
Your caffeine addiction level: low
|
You Are a Candy Heart
|
 You're definitely a pro when it comes to romance - and you have great dating etiquette.
Plus you probably smell and taste pretty darn good.
|
Your SAT Score of 1530 Means:
|

You Scored Higher Than Howard Stern
You Scored Higher Than George W. Bush
You Scored Higher Than Al Gore
You Scored Higher Than David Duchovny
You Scored Higher Than Natalie Portman
You Scored Lower Than Bill Gates
Your IQ is most likely in the 140-150 range
Equivalent ACT score: 34
Schools that Fit Your SAT Score:
California Institute of Technology
Stanford University
Princeton University
Yale University
Harvard University
|
You Are Bert
|
 Extremely serious and a little eccentric, people find you loveable - even if you don't love them!
You are usually feeling: Logical - you rarely let your emotions rule you
You are famous for: Being smart, a total neat freak, and maybe just a little evil
How you life your life: With passion, even if your odd passions (like bottle caps and pigeons) are baffling to others
|
You Should Drive a DeLorean
|
 You don't take yourself too seriously, and you prefer a fun, unusual car... like this Back to the Future gem!
|
Posted by: caltechgirl at
06:31 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 270 words, total size 5 kb.
Friday Quiz Braindump
You Are 52% Politically Radical
|
 You've got some radical viewpoints, but you aren't completely nuts. You're more of a visionary than a radical.
|
Your 1996 Theme Song Is: Breakfast at Tiffany's by Deep Blue Something
|
 And I said "What about Breakfast at Tiffany's?"
She said, "I think I remember the film,
And as I recall, I think, we both kinda liked it."
And I said, "Well, that's the one thing we've got."
|
You Are Scooter
|
 Brainy and knowledgable, you are the perfect sidekick.
You're always willing to lend a helping hand.
In any big event or party, you're the one who keeps things going.
"15 seconds to showtime!"
|
You Are Pork
|
 You like to think you're the other white meat, but many people don't want anything to do with you.
You probably smoke. And it's likely that no body part of yours is off limits.
|
Posted by: caltechgirl at
05:55 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 164 words, total size 3 kb.
March 08, 2007
Mr. Humphries, no longer free
John Inman, best known as the ambiguously gay Mr. Humphries on the BBC series
Are You Being Served? has passed away.
Actor John Inman, died aged 71 on Thursday.
Inman, who later became a pantomime regular, was one of the sitcom's most memorable cast members and his catchphrase "I'm free" became part of popular culture.
In 1976, he was voted "Funniest Man On Television" by readers of TV Times magazine and was also named BBC TV's "Personality Of The Year."
He died at St Mary's Hospital in London after having been ill for some time, his manager Phil Dale said in a statement.
"John, through his character Mr Humphries of Are You Being Served? was known and loved throughout the world," Dale said.
Here's Mr. Inman at his best:
Rest in Peace, Mr. Humphries. You were always my favorite.
Posted by: caltechgirl at
03:30 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 149 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I loved that show and him. I'm sorry to hear he is gone.
Posted by: vw bug at March 08, 2007 06:37 PM (sLSBW)
2
Aww, that's too bad. That show always made me laugh and his character was my favorite.
Posted by: ricki at March 09, 2007 08:31 AM (O5SYw)
3
I love how one of his co-stars, Wendy Richard, described his character. "We never, ever said he was gay. He's just a boy who happened to get along very, very well with his mother."
Posted by: Emily at March 09, 2007 10:00 AM (lXDk3)
4
I loved that show as long as I can remember, but I only truly "got" it after having worked in retail. And after that, it actually became ten times funnier, if that's even possible.
Posted by: Dave J at March 09, 2007 07:01 PM (8QErC)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
March 07, 2007
It's a Boy!
Welcome to the world,
Cole (Pilot) Blogger, Jr.March 7, 2007, 8:02pm 7lb 14 Oz, 22 in longCongrats to
Dad Aaron and Mom Kelly! He's cute as a button! Pics
here.
Posted by: caltechgirl at
08:25 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 35 words, total size 1 kb.
This one's for the teachers: a question
So I know that many of you loyal readers (commenters and lurkers, both) are teachers, at many levels from preschool all the way up to college/ adult education.
I've got a question for you:
How do you explain to your students that just because your program is small and all of the faculty are willing to bend over backwards to help them, DOES NOT mean that they can take advantage of that on a regular basis?
For example, how do I explain that even though I told them I would be more than happy to answer questions, I WILL NOT tell them whether a particular number is the right or wrong answer. ESPECIALLY when the question is part of the take-home portion of the exam.
How do I explain that if there were 700 students in the class (as would be expected at a school like UCLA), as the instructor, I wouldn't give them the time of day, let alone guarantee that I wouldn't laugh at them for begging to have the exam postponed and then ADMITTING they were working on the take home test together???
I guess what I'm asking is how do I explain to these
children that even though there are only a few of them I am holding them to a high standard? And that it's for their own good? I mean, they are in this program because they want to go to
MEDICAL SCHOOL. They won't get any breaks there. And they MUST be up to standards, or they'll fail miserably.
I will not set them up for failure. They can't see that what I am teaching them is the VERY BASE for the next 7-12 years of their education. And if they don't get this, the rest will be even worse. If I don't hold them to the same standard, they
WILL fail.
So how do I do this without being the bad guy?
Posted by: caltechgirl at
02:03 PM
| Comments (10)
| Add Comment
Post contains 327 words, total size 2 kb.
1
You can't do it without being the bad guy - plain and simple. Sorry.
Posted by: Greta at March 07, 2007 02:15 PM (1aPAo)
2
my answer exactly, you have to be the bad guy
Posted by: Jane at March 07, 2007 02:16 PM (86QII)
3
Umm, fail them once or twice and see how they straighten up. I never had a teacher in High School or College that would even think of doing anything like that.
Posted by: Contagion at March 07, 2007 02:25 PM (L1GVu)
4
I know, it's just harder to be the bad guy when it's a few students. With 700 others I could just say "so what?" and point to the fact that no one else is bitching.....
They already don't like me because I'm a hardass. At least in their minds.
Posted by: caltechgirl at March 07, 2007 02:39 PM (r0kgl)
5
Well, I was always the bad guy, so take it with a grain of salt if you really want to try to avoid it - but I'd explain it just the way you did here. These are college kids, they should (theoretically) be able to handle a rationally presented explanation. And even if they're not thrilled, knowing where you're coming from is never a bad idea. That said, if they're really just hoping for the easy way out, no amount of truth or explanation is going do anything other than paint you as a villian. Keep doing the right thing though - the world needs more teachers who are strong enough to hang tough.
Posted by: beth at March 07, 2007 03:54 PM (bOETT)
6
They deserve your honesty, really. The real world is harsh, as we all know. Many aren't prepared for that. I train in a corporation and it never fails to amaze me how many don't understand that they aren't "coddled" when it comes to work, that they need to pay attention, there will be an exam and if they don't pass, they won't have a job - plain, simple, consistent. I would disagree that you have to be the "bad guy" because I'm a firm believer that you can present it in a way that helps them understand your role is help them find the answers, not *give* them the answers. There will always be the few that won't understand - but chances are they won't quite make it through Medical School anyway.
Posted by: Merri at March 07, 2007 08:28 PM (fdAim)
7
Personally, I'd address the class as a whole and explain it exactly like you did to us.
Tell them that you're willing to help them - to a certain extent - without giving them the answers... as long as they don't abuse your good nature or cheat. Also, explain that you are holding them to a high standard because if they don't understand the core - or "very base" - work now that THEY WILL FAIL LATER!
I'd also tell them if they think you're giving them a hard time they can go over to UCLA and see exactly how much individual time the professors give each student. It might be an enlightening field trip for them.
If that doesn't work give me a call, I'll run over their toes and smash their shins with my wheelchair. ;-)
V5
Posted by: V5 at March 08, 2007 03:37 AM (bP+3v)
8
Why do you care if you're the bad guy? Do what you know you need to do. They'll get over it and be better off as a result.
Posted by: zonker at March 08, 2007 08:02 AM (PrUNH)
9
They all want to be doctors right? Well, propose this scenario to them.
/begin preaching
How would you feel if you went to a doctor for a life threatening condition and you found out that the only reason the doctor got through medical school was because his teachers and other students helped him with all the exams and answers to homework questions. That the guy never did any of the work himself...
Would you trust this person to give you the very best care? Would you even trust this person to prescribe you aspirin... let alone some of the more involved drugs? Would you let this person operate on you?
What happens when you get out of med school and have to start working on your own - no one to ask for the answers? Will you kill someone in the first few months because you prescribed a medication without taking the proper precautions... or without giving the proper doses? All because you didn't have a teacher or one of the other students to tell you - "that's wrong"?
If they want to be good doctors, they need to start now - with the small stuff that doesn't matter. No one dies if they get the wrong answer on your test - but the practice of doing their own work, finding their own conclusions and working for the right answer will carry over to medical school and later to medical practice.
/end preaching
Maybe one or two will actually get it. The rest never will. And that's how you end up with such piss poor doctors in the world.
Posted by: Teresa at March 08, 2007 09:26 AM (gsbs5)
10
I've found that the phrase, "I'm sorry but I can't do that," followed by an honest explanation usually works for me:
"I'm sorry, I can't do that, it wouldn't be fair to the other students."
"I'm sorry, I can't tell you the answer until after I have graded the exams. I need to see how you go about the thought process to get to the answer."
"No, I'm sorry, but when you get out into the working world, there won't be people providing you with help, so you need to learn to be resourceful now."
The thing is: you're not REALLY being the bad guy. They will think you are. They will probably piss and moan and complain about it on evaluations. But in truth, you would be being the bad guy IF you caved to their requests and continued to enable them in being infantile. Because then they wouldn't be able to function in the working world.
I had a high school chem teacher that I HATED. She always pissed me off. She was so hard-nosed and seemed so unfair and distant. And then - at the end of the year, when I graduated and realized I actually UNDERSTOOD chemistry and could DO chemistry on my own (and ultimately wound up tutoring a lot of people in my college dorm in chemistry), then I realized that she had actually been the GOOD GUY by insisting that we do it ourselves. (She also used to insist on tests that we figure out the correct answer for questions we got wrong, using our textbook and notes.)
Posted by: ricki at March 09, 2007 08:36 AM (O5SYw)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
March 06, 2007
March 05, 2007
"dookies" aptly named
Gerald Henderson's sucker punch last night was a
fucking cheap shot.
And that's not just because I'm a Heels fan. Henderson took at least three steps from his previous position near the sideline, jumped, and brought his forearm down directly on Tyler Hansborough's face. It was nothing more or less than a bitch slap.
dook was down 12 points with 14.5 seconds left in the game. There was no point in playing that close on defense, LET ALONE getting airborne to deliver some kind of fucked up karate chop.
Watch it for yourself:
As Tim Montemayor, sitting in on Tim Brando's Sporting News Radio show, said this afternoon: What if Hansborough had been seriously injured? After all, the nose is right next to the BRAIN. Furthermore (again from Monty), what would the basketball talking heads be saying if this was another team, not dook. What if it was John Chaney or John Calipari on the bench instead of Coach Can-I-Buy-A-Vowel?
Would this pass so easily if it wasn't a dookie?
The sporting media's pro-dook bias is stunning. I mean, who hasn't heard Dickie V called "Dookie V?" There's a reason. And he's not alone. Yes, dook has a reputation for running a tight ship, for demanding excellence and not tolerating poor sportsmanship.
Well, if that's the case, why isn't the University imposing its own suspension on Henderson? Especially as the ACC came out this afternoon saying that the only reason Henderson will sit out the first ACC tourney game this weekend is because he was ejected from the UNC game on Sunday, and ACC rules require ANY ejected player to be suspended from the following game. In other words, the ACC thinks that Hansborough's nose magically started bleeding on its own.
Anybody that delivers that kind of flagrant shit hit deserves to be done for more than one game. He hit him IN THE HEAD. In football, a helmet hit gets 3 times as much punishment.
Methinks it comes down to the cash. dook with Henderson is a better team than dook without Henderson. And the farther dook goes in the tourney (either the ACC this weekend OR the Big Dance), the more $$ for the ACC, the NCAA, and the TV....
In any case, I am glad to hear Tyler isn't hurt badly, just a small non-displaced fracture, for which he is being fitted for an acrylic mask. Looks like the return of HawkMan!
And we all know what happened the last time UNC had HawkMan on the hardwood.
Go Heels!
Posted by: caltechgirl at
05:13 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 428 words, total size 3 kb.
1
Up by 14 points with 12.5 seconds left, you might question the wisdom of still having your starters in the game.
And the media by NO MEANS is on Duke's side in this. Every media outlet I've read said it was intentional (and I don't think it was -- I think he meant to hard foul him, sure, but I don't think he meant it to bonk him in the schnozz) and the bloggers are all over Duke's ass.
Posted by: Lisa at March 06, 2007 06:17 AM (S64wG)
2
Believe it or not... in our little provincial (and I can't begin to tell you how provincial it is here - nothing exists outside of Red Sox and the less important Patriots) they aren't buying Henderson's story either.
I didn't see this until now - I thought they were talking MBA cause I only caught a snippet. LOL. I'll see if any mention comes up this morning.
Posted by: Teresa at March 06, 2007 06:34 AM (gsbs5)
3
To put this into perspective, but with a different Devil: Cam Janssen did essentially the same thing to Tomas Kaberle of the Maple Leafs and got THREE games from the NHL. (Janssen also should have been assesed a five-minute major for charging during the game but got over, at least until Colin Campbell got his peepers on the video.)
Headhunting is inherently dangerous, and even though he "didn't mean" to break Hansbrough's nose, Henderson was aiming to put a hit on him.
Posted by: Nightfly at March 07, 2007 02:22 PM (PuuC1)
4
Just now heard the cross-talk on our sports station out here (WEEI) Jerry Callahan talking to Dale Arnold about a clothesline incident in the NHL last night. One of the NY Islanders tried to take off the head of another player it seems (since I don't know hockey, I can't remember the names).
In any case, they were arguing over which was the worse hit - the Islander guy or Henderson's hit on Hansborough. Jerry was arguing that the only reason he thinks the hockey hit is worse is because the guy has a stick. Dale arguing that Henderson's was worse because it was completely deliberate. Heh.
I saw NC State take out Duke last night (YAY) and the ESPN announcers trying to absolve Duke of any wrong-doing... Their "reasoning" such as it is - that Coach K has such respect for the game - if he thought his player had deliberately done something wrong, he would have added to the penalty. (Gag me!)
Posted by: Teresa at March 09, 2007 07:25 AM (gsbs5)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
March 02, 2007
I got nothin'
What are YOU doing this weekend?
Posted by: caltechgirl at
11:49 AM
| Comments (18)
| Add Comment
Post contains 12 words, total size 1 kb.
1
At the moment... trying to stay dry. I know there were several things we were planning on - but at the moment I can't remember a single one. So maybe the plans were all in my imagination. Wouldn't be the first time. Heh.
Posted by: Teresa at March 02, 2007 12:11 PM (gsbs5)
Posted by: Emily at March 02, 2007 01:09 PM (lXDk3)
3
Collecting FFO coinages.
Posted by: Ken S, Fifth String on the Banjo of Life at March 02, 2007 01:25 PM (PvqFn)
4
Oh, nothing... Just having a kid, possibly.
You know, if you aren't going to entertain your readers this weekend, you could send them my way.
Posted by: Aaron at March 02, 2007 01:50 PM (Eg4La)
5
Officers' Dine-In...
there will be much consumed. worry not.
Posted by: rsm at March 02, 2007 02:16 PM (asw+D)
6
I don't know about you, but I know my Saturday will involve wearing a sparkly top that sheds glitter everywhere while singing about white horses' sleeping habits, Johnny's missing bits and parts, and a Canadian who tries to use a river as a voicemail service.
Oh, and I'm getting my hair cut in the morning. I'm thinking I might grow it out to your length or so. Thoughts? (Maybe your DH won't think I have a boy haircut anymore.

)
Posted by: Kj at March 02, 2007 02:55 PM (lghAZ)
7
Not drunk blogging... sigh.
Posted by: Contagion at March 02, 2007 03:44 PM (pBx72)
8
Red Bull and Absolut are my partners in crime this weekend
Posted by: Sissy at March 02, 2007 08:34 PM (y2kUf)
9
Oddly enough, I'm doing the same thing as Kj. And cruising for bargain airfare to Rome. Any ideas?
Posted by: ZTZCheese at March 02, 2007 09:00 PM (GcuaU)
10
Tomorrow-housewifey stuff; clean, and declutter.
Sunday-nephew's 1st birthday party, and in the evening, a few people are coming over to watch the UFC fight, which will be recorded on the DVR from the night before so that we don't have guests over until l in the morning.
Somewhere in between-read a case study for school and write a short paper on it, due on Tuesday.
In other words, not much. ;-)
Posted by: Amanda at March 02, 2007 09:12 PM (wBkwz)
11
This fine Saturday morning? Snowed in at home here in Iowa, after a week of the most implausible chain of massive snowstorms, one after another.
By Sunday afternoon, I'm supposed to be on my way down to Dubuque for a few days of study leave.
Them snowplows better get crackin'.
Posted by: Paul Burgess at March 03, 2007 05:47 AM (7EVyU)
12
I'm up in Mammoth, just came off the mountain from skiing.
Moon rise tonight, there is a total lunar eclipse. We'll see the last little bit of it, as Europe gets to see all of it, but stick your head out at moon rise tonight!
Posted by: Bill at March 03, 2007 01:10 PM (sAose)
13
Church newsletter, laundry, feeding the girls every five minutes (they *must* be growing), wine... The usual. ;-)
Posted by: Richmond at March 03, 2007 06:13 PM (e8QFP)
14
*empties pockets*
*sighs*
I've got nothin', too.
Posted by: Mrs. Who at March 04, 2007 09:01 AM (9FXen)
15
When I ain't got much to say..which is damn seldom..I just scan the NY Times..Will Rogers once said that was where he got most of his material..I believe it.
Posted by: GUYK at March 04, 2007 03:44 PM (Xbba2)
16
The same thing I do every weekend: sleep and work. I don't have a life, so that's about the extent of it all....
Posted by: Thomas Warlock at March 04, 2007 05:13 PM (4XTVw)
17
.. yeah, what Emily said....
Posted by: Eric at March 04, 2007 06:17 PM (NlzwQ)
Posted by: Paladin at March 05, 2007 02:22 PM (1/VyJ)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
78kb generated in CPU 0.0428, elapsed 0.1154 seconds.
83 queries taking 0.0934 seconds, 280 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.