August 10, 2006
Some of you know Helen, and you know she is neither sad nor a moonbat. She may be a self-described "crunchy granola vegetarian", but if anything, my dear friend is almost entirely apolitical.
I too am appalled by the idea that I would have to trust my cellphone, ipod, and laptop to the honesty of baggage handlers; that my nieces and nephew wouldn't be allowed crayons or snacks on a long, boring flight; that I can have my contact lenses, but not the solution I need to put them in my eyeballs; that racial profiling is a cheap shortcut in the battle against terror.
That Malkin calls such honest sadness "whining" and "moonbattery" is beyond me.
I think we should ALL be sad. I think it should strengthen our resolve to tear these motherfuckers a new asshole. I think it should make us more focused on using ALL the resources we can to identify the dickwads who would do this and find out what they intend before they do it.
Posted by: caltechgirl at
12:20 PM
| Comments (11)
| Add Comment
Post contains 223 words, total size 1 kb.
Here's what got me:
"Head cases
A few neurological differences between women and men from Louann Brizendine's "The Female Brain":
Thoughts about sex enter women's brains once every couple of days; for men, thoughts about sex occur every minute.
Women use 20,000 words per day; men use 7,000 per day.
Women excel at knowing what people are feeling; men have difficulty spotting an emotion unless someone cries or threatens bodily harm.
Women remember fights that a man insists never happened.
Women over 50 are more likely to initiate divorce."NONE OF THESE ARE NEUROLOGICAL DIFFERENCES!
SOME of them have to do with functionality/ functional outcome, but for FUCK's SAKE, is it AT ALL responsible to say that because a woman is over 50 that she files for divorce because her brain is hard-wired to do so???? I mean COME ON.
MAYBE MAYBE you COULD make the case that women's brains are MORE dependent on the influence of sex hormones than men's and that after menopause function is decreased BECAUSE hormone levels drop.
Sorry to be so mad, but while I am technically a developmental neurobiologist, I am ALSO a neuroendocrinologist. Which means I study how hormone signals affect the brain. This is my field, folks.
It is ENTIRELY not clear that the differences in the way women and men think are at all somatic (body-based) rather than socially nurtured. There is a growing body of evidence that Estrogen and Testosterone drive certain biological processes in the brain, HOWEVER, E and T are both converted to the same physiologically active molecule (they're not that different to begin with). Some of the proposed difference may have to do with feedback mechanisms based on progesterone (P), which women have in abundance compared to men.
The idiot who wrote this book argues that women's brains are "wired for communication". Sure, fine, but IT IS NOT AT ALL CLEAR based on the available evidence that this wiring is a direct effect of having 2 X chromosomes. MUCH of the wiring in our brains, and in fact the very essence of what we believe about learning and memory, is based on our experience. The neurological imprint of experience shapes the pattern of wiring in our brains. If we speak multiple languages as children, for example, we are more able as adults to learn and comprehend multiple languages, as our brains are wired for it. Because Estrogen and Progesterone affect the processes of wiring, that may play a small role, but clearly, experience is the basis of preferential wiring and preferential connectivity.
There are some anatomical differences in the brains of men and women. First of all, men have bigger brains. No shit. They have bigger bodies. They also have bigger feet. the overlap is also pretty significant. There are some small areas within the brain that are smaller or larger between the sexes, most notably an area in the hypothalamus smaller than the end of your pinky that is significantly different between the sexes (except, purportedly in homosexuals....) according to Simon LeVay back in the late 80s/early90s. He's a pretty well respected researcher, even though some of his stuff is pretty controversial, like that study.
Grrrr.
Also, she talks about hormone cycling and clinical trials, and thats no longer a valid excuse. Women MUST be included in ALL trials where a therapeutic benefit to females may be achieved (so, that's everything but things like prostate cancer or ED...). Women who participate in studies that may be affected by their hormones have to keep track of their cycles and note if they are taking any other medications that could alter hormone levels or function, such as birth control, HRT, anti-cholesterol medications (statins especially), and some antibiotics. These factors are generally accounted for, and generally make no difference.
To sum up, while the premise of the book is not entrely bogus, based on her arguments in the interview and the "neurological differences" presented at the end, it is clear that this book is full of inconclusive data and incomplete understanding, and should be viewed as a POSSIBLE explanation for some of the cognitive/ personality/ functional differences between the sexes. And a far too simple one, at that.
Just also wanted to point out that it appears that the author of this book is in fact a "real" scientist, who evidently publishes research about hormones and depression.... So perhaps this book is an extended theoretical paper.
Posted by: caltechgirl at
11:43 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 749 words, total size 8 kb.
August 09, 2006
OTB has the video from Hannity and Colmes here
Posted by: caltechgirl at
08:57 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 30 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: caltechgirl at
04:05 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 45 words, total size 1 kb.
August 08, 2006
Jenny was bored. She looked out the window and gazed over the lawn, and down the lane. Two hours until the mail arrived, the highlight of her day. After the white truck pulled away, she would walk down the lane to the street and see who was sending her junk mail this time. Then back up to the house to be bored again.
Life in the country is so wonderful, they'd told her. You'll love the quiet, the animals, the gentle breezes. Bullshit, she thought. Not even here a week and already everything seemed so bland. Standing up she turned from the window and moved toward the kitchen for a glass of water. A sudden noise made her turn back around. In the lane was a small man, neat of appearance, and moving quickly towards the house. He was clearly calling out, but she could not make out what he was saying.
Posted by: caltechgirl at
12:15 AM
| Comments (17)
| Add Comment
Post contains 170 words, total size 1 kb.
August 07, 2006
well, ok. great. Check this:
Link Popularity Total 303,763
Does that make me triple iconic? I find this highly bogus, especially as:
1) I am no icon. Try Glenn Reynolds. Iconoclast., sure, Icon, No way.
2) The Google hit was zero. Yeah, as if you know, more than half my traffic was fake.
h/t GuyK
Posted by: caltechgirl at
03:27 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 93 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: caltechgirl at
12:40 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 21 words, total size 1 kb.
Reuters: 1 hour, 25 minutes agoStay tuned. As always, Babalu has the latest.Peaceful succession under way in Cuba: official
Cuba has set in motion a peaceful political succession, dashing U.S. government expectations of chaos following Fidel Castro's hand-over of power to his brother, a leading Cuban intellectual and government member, Roberto Fernandez Retamar, said on Monday.
"They (the U.S. government) had not expected that a peaceful succession was possible. A peaceful succession has taken place in Cuba," Fernandez Retamar said at a news conference.
The writer and member of the Council of State was the first government official to say a succession under Raul Castro was in motion after Fidel Castro relinquished power a week ago following gastric surgery.
h/t Smash
Posted by: caltechgirl at
12:02 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 140 words, total size 1 kb.
August 04, 2006
Posted by: caltechgirl at
09:41 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 17 words, total size 1 kb.
August 03, 2006
Posted by: caltechgirl at
10:22 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 27 words, total size 1 kb.
August 02, 2006
On a related note, I think we finally know who really SHOULD run Hollyweird: Matt and Trey....
Posted by: caltechgirl at
03:13 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 24 words, total size 1 kb.
And many more!
Posted by: caltechgirl at
03:11 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 19 words, total size 1 kb.
my take on Israel vs Hezboolahboolah
a story rattling around in my head
a must read article on parenting styles and society.
Coming soon!
Posted by: caltechgirl at
10:57 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 27 words, total size 1 kb.
78 queries taking 0.0567 seconds, 247 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








