March 11, 2006
Yum.
You Are Guinness |

You know beer well, and you'll only drink the best beers in the world.
Watered down beers disgust you, as do the people who drink them.
When you drink, you tend to become a bit of a know it all - especially about subjects you don't know well.
But your friends tolerate your drunken ways, because you introduce them to the best beers around.
|
Oh yeah. Seeing as how this is about the ONLY beer I'll drink. And my favorite to cook with, too.
h/t
Heineken Deb
Posted by: caltechgirl at
06:28 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 89 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Okay who ever wrote that quiz knows nothing about beer. (Almost as bad as the martini quiz, which if done properly would only have one possible solution to any grouping of answers) Honestly how can you mention beer with out A) Germnay or B) Belgum, where the best beers in the world is made.
Now I do like my Guiness too, but its got nothing on any Belgian Beer (side note, there are some Canadian Belgian-Style beers that are pretty decent too).
Posted by: the Pirate at March 13, 2006 11:03 AM (0ZKi5)
2
I see that you and I have something in common. Of course, it has to be beer since our favorite collegiate teams are bitter rivals.
My visit to the James Gate Brewery in Dublin ranked as one of the high points during my trip to Ireland.
Posted by: physics geek at March 13, 2006 11:17 AM (Xvrs7)
3
Oh, Guinness... Excuse me, I need to go drinking now.
Posted by: Contagion at March 13, 2006 02:41 PM (e8b4J)
4
What the Pirate said. I may be a Bostonian with the obligatory fondness for the Guiness every now and then, but, please, I spent six months in Brussels, too. A poll on beer with mentioning Belgium is like a poll on pasta without mentioning Italy: it's just completely absurd.
My results came back Guiness, of course, but give me Hoegaarden.
Posted by: Dave J at March 16, 2006 10:53 PM (5WofA)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Green with....
You Are Teal Green |

You are a one of a kind, original person. There's no one even close to being like you.
Expressive and creative, you have a knack for making the impossible possible.
While you are a bit offbeat, you don't scare people away with your quirks.
Your warm personality nicely counteracts and strange habits you may have.
|
I suppose I woud have preferred Emerald or Forest, but hell, it wasn't Olive, right?
And interestingly enough, the bridesmaid dresses at my wedding were approximately the darker color in the picture above. Although that was a combination of price, available sizes and acceptable style more than the color. Which is a bitch to match shoes to.
h/t a real
Gem
Posted by: caltechgirl at
06:24 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 121 words, total size 1 kb.
March 10, 2006
Ain't it the truth!
Your Luck Quotient: 62% |

You have a high luck quotient. More often than not, you've felt very lucky in your life. You may be randomly lucky, but it's probably more than that. Optimistic and open minded, you take advantage of all the luck that comes your way.
|
h/t
Deb, who is indeed luckier than most, no matter what the quiz says!
Posted by: caltechgirl at
09:43 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 67 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I always find the best stuff here.
Posted by: thirdee at March 10, 2006 01:10 PM (jCOM2)
2
Yep, I come out the same. But I never really believed in luck as much as I believed in understanding the odds.
Posted by: GUYK at March 10, 2006 01:31 PM (iAhlK)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
March 09, 2006
I've been sitting on this...
But somehow
this post from Christina reminded me of it.
This may possibly be the truest thing published in USA Today in YEARS. I couldn't pick and choose, so here is the majority of the article:
Last month, as I averaged the second-quarter grades for my senior English classes at T.C. Williams High School in Alexandria, Va., the same familiar pattern leapt out at me.
Kids who had emigrated from foreign countries — such as Shewit Giovanni from Ethiopia, Farah Ali from Guyana and Edgar Awumey from Ghana — often aced every test, while many of their U.S.-born classmates from upper-class homes with highly educated parents had a string of C's and D's.
As one would expect, the middle-class American kids usually had higher SAT verbal scores than did their immigrant classmates, many of whom had only been speaking English for a few years.
What many of the American kids I taught did not have was the motivation, self-discipline or work ethic of the foreign-born kids.
Politicians and education bureaucrats can talk all they want about reform, but until the work ethic of U.S. students changes, until they are willing to put in the time and effort to master their subjects, little will change.
A study released in December by University of Pennsylvania researchers Angela Duckworth and Martin Seligman suggests that the reason so many U.S. students are "falling short of their intellectual potential" is not "inadequate teachers, boring textbooks and large class sizes" and the rest of the usual litany cited by the so-called reformers — but "their failure to exercise self-discipline."
The sad fact is that in the USA, hard work on the part of students is no longer seen as a key factor in academic success.
...
When asked to identify the most important factors in their performance in math, the percentage of Japanese and Taiwanese students who answered "studying hard" was twice that of American students.
American students named native intelligence, and some said the home environment. But a clear majority of U.S. students put the responsibility on their teachers. A good teacher, they said, was the determining factor in how well they did in math.
"Kids have convinced parents that it is the teacher or the system that is the problem, not their own lack of effort," says Dave Roscher, a chemistry teacher at T.C. Williams in this Washington suburb. "In my day, parents didn't listen when kids complained about teachers. We are supposed to miraculously make kids learn even though they are not working."
As my colleague Ed Cannon puts it: "Today, the teacher is supposed to be responsible for motivating the kid. If they don't learn it is supposed to be our problem, not theirs."
And, of course, busy parents guilt-ridden over the little time they spend with their kids are big subscribers to this theory.
...
"Nowadays, it's the kids who have the power. When they don't do the work and get lower grades, they scream and yell. Parents side with the kids who pressure teachers to lower standards," says Joel Kaplan, another chemistry teacher at T.C. Williams.
Every year, I have had parents come in to argue about the grades I have given in my AP English classes. To me, my grades are far too generous; to middle-class parents, they are often an affront to their sense of entitlement. If their kids do a modicum of work, many parents expect them to get at least a B. When I have given C's or D's to bright middle-class kids who have done poor or mediocre work, some parents have accused me of destroying their children's futures.
...
Colleges keep complaining that students are coming to them unprepared. Instead of raising admissions standards, however, they keep accepting mediocre students, lest cuts have to be made in faculty and administration.
Author Patrick Welsh is an English teacher in suburban Alexandria, VA.
As the wife of a teacher and a professor to recent High School grads I can attest to every word being said here. What do you think?
h/t Weekend Pundit
Posted by: caltechgirl at
01:03 PM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 687 words, total size 5 kb.
1
I think the success of a student is THE responsibility of the student. If they have a poor teacher, tutoring, internet support classes, etc are available. There is no reason NOT to succeed, unless by choice.
Enough said.
Posted by: Dana at March 09, 2006 02:04 PM (euBkS)
2
The article correctly divides the responsibility between the parent and child. However we expect children to make poor judgements and bad choices. It is the job of the parents to guide them through these years and set an example of proper behavior. Thus I place most of the rsponsibilty on the parents.
At some point in time, our nation's parents began to endulge their children, and shifted their loyalties from the school and teacher to the child. In my generation (I'm 40) the parent almost always sided with the school, and reinforced the school's message. The parents of my students (I teach seventh grade) side with the students and undermine my authority.
I just held student led conferences, and had half a dozen or parents approach me and try to blame me for the fact that their child did no homework and so received an "F'. ( Even after I sent home two failing progress reports informing them of this)
Posted by: gahrie at March 09, 2006 03:46 PM (BJYNn)
3
That happened here too! Spectacularly
Posted by: caltechgirl at March 09, 2006 03:51 PM (jOkK0)
4
Good article.. I'll try and link to you later and comment about it.
Posted by: vw bug at March 09, 2006 04:15 PM (qxjXY)
5
I agree, by and large, but I also don't think TC Williams is a particularly great example to use. At least when I was in highschool around here, TC was the school that parents from other schools didn't let their kids go to for football games (which are heavily attended by police) etc. etc. It was heavily gang ridden etc. I'm surprised the author feels there are any students there from "affluent households" - unless something major has changed about that area of Alexandria, which last time I drove through, it hadn't.
That said, the motivation of students is something that I noticed as lacking incredibly when I was teaching (in various other locales) and I have to wonder what the root cause is. Is motivation something parents teach? I can't recall ever not being motivated - but is that because my parents taught it at a young age? They're both certainly big believers in personal motivation/work ethic etc, so that's very possible. Whatever it is, we need to recapture it. That's for certain.
Posted by: beth at March 09, 2006 05:56 PM (2qc7C)
6
There's a lot here, lady.
Complacency, laziness, lack of supervision and interest from parents, just to name a few, are all factors here.
The Japanese, Chinese, Indians, Pakistanis, and more all place much higher value and expectation on school, studying, and academic performance.
As a whole, despite being one of the countries with the fewest number of vacation days taken per worker, the American work-ethic sucks.
It is all well on its way to biting us on the a$$.
I would like to say the answer begins at home; however, I see it in the classroom, too, where high achievement is often scorned (because it causes too much work the teacher) and standardized tests "dummed" down to avoid discrimination of any kind.
Oh, geez. If I think too long on it, I make myself ill.
Notwithstanding, I'm pleased to see you draw attention to it.
Posted by: Christina at March 09, 2006 07:53 PM (zJsUT)
7
My daughter was a teacher for twelve years even having been a teacher of the year in two states Florida and South Carolina. She quit teaching last year out of frustration not necessarily with the students although there were problems but mainly with parents. Parents are no longer the motivating force behind a student. A teacher simply cannot do it all. We are dumbly downing the system to meet these lower expectations at the expense of true education.
I am sixty years old and can still remember my school years – never once did my parents come down on a teacher. If they came down on anyone, it was most likely my backside. In the “Political Correct” world we now live in it is America’s backsliding in education that is now showing.
Posted by: Edd at March 09, 2006 09:26 PM (v9hrA)
8
I have to agree with the article. I will concede that a teacher who can make a subject matter interesting and 'fun' to learn may ( but not always ) get better results than the teacher who presents the subject matter in a take it or leave it manner. But no matter, learning is the responsibility of the student. Sometimes it involves that little four letter word that too many students avoid-WORK
Posted by: GUYK at March 10, 2006 01:37 PM (iAhlK)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Paging Dr. Google
As many of you know, Dilbert cartoonist (and blogger) Scott Adams has a dystonia which prevents him from drawing without the aid of a computer. About a year ago he started having problems speaking in public as well.
None of the remedies prescribed by the doctors seemed to be working, and one day he realized that the voice problems he was experiencing might be tied to his dystonia. So he asked Dr. Google, who returned the result "Spasmodic Dysphonia", an extremely rare condition resulting in voice changes very similar to what he was experiencing, and to top it off, this condition was more likely to co-occur in people experiencing dystonias.
Here is Scott's account of his search for a doctor who would actually test for the Zebra, even though the entire stable of horses were absent. With a correct diagnosis he's now able to resume public speaking, even if the treatment is a little grody....
What's interesting about the story isn't merely that the doctors were unwilling to listen, but rather it highlights what could have happened if the patient in question wasn't a famous artist with access to a doctor specializing in his particular disorder. Imagine the merry-go-round of drugs, tests, and therapies any of us regular joes might have gone through. Imagine what might have happened if he hadn't had the computer skills to look for what he was experiencing.
Are our doctors willing to go the extra mile? To sort through every possibility in the differential diagnosis to find the right answer? To listen carefully when a patient says "These are my symptoms, and it says here that I could have
this"?
Kinda makes you think, huh?
Posted by: caltechgirl at
11:36 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 281 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Funny that I read this just as my professor is apologizing for Britain's health scheme. "Americans wrongly call it socialized medicine" and "it's just not given enough funding".
Posted by: Cardinal Martini at March 09, 2006 11:56 AM (Mu6wj)
2
It's been my experience that doctor's seldom listen. I spent three years trying to convince a team of doctor's that I had PCOS. They ruled out everything else first.
Why? Because I wasn't a doctor. I was just a woman who knew her own body. I interview my doctor's very carefully now...and either they let me actively participate in my own care, or I look elsewhere. You are your own best advocate!!
Posted by: Dana at March 09, 2006 02:10 PM (euBkS)
3
Wow. I'm with Dana... I want to be involved.
Posted by: vw bug at March 09, 2006 04:11 PM (qxjXY)
4
I grew up watching my mum be told that whatever was wrong with her was all in her head when the doctors couldn't figure it out. It wasn't until a few years ago she was finally diagnosed. And gee, it wasn't all in her head. Go figure.
Posted by: Ith at March 10, 2006 11:14 AM (0ectA)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Spawned
The
Phinlet is here!
Boy 8lbs 14ozs, born between 1 and 2 am this morning, all other details are classified.
Mom and Babe are fine. No word yet on the Phishy.
Congrats to all the family!
Posted by: caltechgirl at
10:06 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 35 words, total size 1 kb.
I'm a Pepper... You're a Pepper....
You Are Dr. Pepper |
 You're very unique and funky, yet you still have a bit of traditionalism to you.
People who like you think they have great taste... and they usually do.
Your best soda match: Root Beer
Stay away from: 7 Up
|
Oh yeah. Love me some Dr. P.
h/t Cokehead Deb
Posted by: caltechgirl at
09:47 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 69 words, total size 1 kb.
Epiphany
I came to a realization this morning while the coffee was brewing:
I am a reality TV junkie.Funny thing, though, it almost happened by default. See I have always been a people watcher. Get me to Disneyland and I love nothing better than to sit out in front of the castle on a bench, eat some overpriced ice cream and see who walks by. So I suppose watching reality shows is a natural extension of that. Don't get me wrong, I don't watch them all, in fact, I am pretty discriminating in my choices.
For example, my "must watch" shows this season include AI (but only AFTER the top 24 are picked), TAR, Survivor, Dog the Bounty Hunter (on the 12 am rerun), EM: Home Edition, and the recently concluded Dancing with the Stars, Skating with Celebrities, and Project Runway (yay Chloe!). The only scripted "must watches" on the list are House (which is the bloody best show on TV!) and 24.
One step down, the "will watch" list includes a lot of scripted shows, like the various L and O franchises, CSI, Criminal Minds (love it, never remember when it's on), and Numbers. The reality "will watch" list includes Mythbusters (on at the SAME F-ING TIME as House and Dog), various Discovery Channels series (I was soooo hooked on Dangerous Catch and Iceberg Cowboys), Queer Eye, and Supernanny/ Nanny 911.
Ok, maybe I do watch a lot of TV, but as the inimitable Tim Gunn says, "It relaxes me." Watching stupid people do stupid things is a great way to wind down from a long day of BS.
Also, like Ben, it's wallpaper much of the time. Just sound on for noise to help me concentrate on whatever I'm doing at the time.
Yeah, I'm weird.
Posted by: caltechgirl at
08:10 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 293 words, total size 2 kb.
March 08, 2006
My Own Feminist Manifesto
This post also marks my
Cotillion debut!
**The following post contains R-rated language**
Today is International Women's Day.
I could give a shit.
Truth be told, in my entire life I've never had much use for the feminist movement. Sure, I've benefited from my "sisters" who came before me. I suppose. But I feel like I've had to make my own way. I work in a profession dominated by men. I went to a university where men outnumbered women by as much as 8 to 1. And yet, I have never experienced discrimination because I am a female.
Yeah, maybe it's because I don't act like a girl. I'm loud, ballsy, and I like to be right. I WILL stand up for what I believe to be the right thing. I give as good as I get in the chain-yanking department, and I have been known to make the men I work with blush because of what I say.
Or maybe it's because I don't look like what the magazines say I should. I'm short, dark, and big. No barbie doll here. Her boobs, maybe, but that's about it.
See the rest in the extended....
more...
Posted by: caltechgirl at
01:40 PM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 1043 words, total size 6 kb.
1
I definitely agree with everything you have said in this post. Not only have "feminists" inadvertently reverted back to the idea that women should be defined by their physical (sexual) characteristics, but I think they have lost sight of what the true feminist movement was all about. Like you mention, it was all intended to bring about equality between the sexes. Now it seems, at least to me, that a majority of feminists want to wipe men off the planet. Men are not the enemy here. Its the women who like to feel victimized and underprivaledged (i.e. feminists) that are keeping women down. I have never once felt discriminated against because of a certain XX chromosome...I've gotten (or was offered) every job I've ever applied for, and I was accepted to all but one of the universities I applied to out of highschool. These feminists need to stop complaining about what they don't have and actually start to work for it.
Posted by: The Skirted Menace at March 08, 2006 04:09 PM (GWRCz)
2
Here here!
Although, what you describe (and I heartily endorse every single thought above) is what I think the feminists had in mind in the first place. I imagine Susan B. Anthony is spinning in her grave - as are so many of the original women's movement.
Posted by: beth at March 08, 2006 05:11 PM (2qc7C)
3
Couldn't have said it any better than that. Fantastic post.
Posted by: Miss Fire at March 08, 2006 05:31 PM (EZgmg)
4
You write very nice in the beginning and you seem to be a very smart woman. But when you start to want to limit other women's choice, you become just another hysteric american. Why is it so hard for you to accept that other people have another opinion. No one is going to force you or anyone you love to take an abortion. Why do you want women to go and take illegal abortion, and maybe risk their life. Women will always try to controll their fertility. Please, wake up! Don't be a fool and limit other peoples choice.
are you kidding me? Did I say anything about illegal abortion? Or are you one of those who reads that into everything? How did you miss the pro-choice part? Sheesh.
Oh, and thanks for the laugh -- CTG
Posted by: therese at March 09, 2006 04:56 AM (YKZBj)
5
"the SINGLE MOST EMPOWERING thing a woman can do is to bear a child and be its mother" --- You're not kidding. I've always believed that I could do anything I set my mind to, also. And after having a child and being his mother 24x7, I know that I'll never do more important work than mothering.
"These rights also come with some responsibilities: To take responsibility for their own failures, not to blame them on others' prejudices; to respect your own body; to take care of your family; to treat others as you would want to be treated." ----- Applause!
Posted by: Marie at March 09, 2006 07:05 AM (ZNESr)
6
This is a great post. I was faced with an unplanned pregnancy at the age of 14. I was raped by an older man very well known in my community. In 1964, to get an abortion I went across the border to Juarez, Mexico. A lot of bad things happened in that clinic and a strong father came and got me off that table. I believe I owe my life to my father. Anyway, we, my dad and I chose life and I had to relinquish my son.
I do believe in pro choice. i got very involved in helping birthmother's, adoptee's and adoptive parents reunite. I found there were birthfather's wanting to find also.
The feminist movement gets me furious! I can not watch so many sitcoms because the man is shown as the weaker link.
I am older, 56 now. I have seen the movement grow in to a national embaressment in my opinion, if that mounts to much. I will not ever tell my daughter or granddaughter what she can or can not do being a woman. Instead I tell them how very great they are and they can make their own choices. My daughter went from welfare to work and now she is helping women in Washington State to do the same and is giving programs where she is the main speaker.
All of the above goes to show just how strong women are and we need not join any radical group to get ahead!
Didn't mean to ramble just to tell you this post is EXCELLENT and THANKS!
Posted by: Janelle at March 09, 2006 12:09 PM (tK0mN)
7
go girls you will always kick butt
Posted by: rori at June 12, 2006 04:39 PM (3AKUE)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
March 07, 2006
SB County Sheriffs: Two steps back, one step forward
Many of you SoCal folks already know the story:
Air Force Security officer Elio Carrion was shot during a routine traffic stop that quickly spiraled out of control. Carrion was a passenger in his friend's car when officers pulled them over after a short chase at speeds over 100mph. Carrion and the driver exited the car and complied with police wishes.
When Officer Ivory Webb told Carrion to "Get Up", he complied slowly, and before he could stand all the way up, the cop shot him three times.
A neighbor captured the entire incident on film. CNN has the story:
The decision to charge Deputy Ivory J. Webb, 45, was announced by San Bernardino, California, County District Attorney Michael A. Ramos.
Ramos said that sheriff's deputy Webb's belief that he was in danger was unreasonable in the eyes of the law. He said Webb's gunshots were "intended to kill" Air Force security officer Elio Carrion.
<...>
Charging Webb was a "difficult decision," Ramos told the AP, but enhancing the videotape "made our decision easier." In the tape, Carrion appears to be on the ground while a deputy sheriff stands above him with a gun drawn.
"Get up!" the deputy shouts.
"OK," Carrion says.
"Get up!" the deputy shouts again.
"I'm going to get up," Carrion says and starts to rise.
The deputy fires three shots, striking Carrion in the chest, leg and shoulder.
From the ground, a moaning Carrion attempts to explain to the deputy he is an Iraq war veteran. "I mean you no harm," he says.
"Shut the ... up!" the deputy shouts. "Shut the ... up!"
The deputy shouts that he had "one down," then again told Carrion to "shut the ... up."
"You don't get up!" he says.
Then the voice of a neighbor watching the incident can be heard saying, "You told him to get up!"
BTW, that neighbor was also arrested on an outstanding warrant and may be deported, thanks to his videotaping the incident.
Attempted involuntary manslaughter? Give me a break. The cop TRIED TO KILL HIM. Period. At least he's looking at more than 15 years in jail. Which he'll never get...
The FBI is also investigating and federal civil rights charges may be brought. I say throw the book at him. A cop trying to protect himself is one thing, shooting a man for directly complying with his wishes is entirely another.
h/t Greyhawk
Posted by: caltechgirl at
05:28 PM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 418 words, total size 3 kb.
1
I have no sympathy for the cop in question right now, but it's important to ask what went wrong here. The important thing that went wrong, at least to me, is the (apparent) mental disconnect in the officer's head between "Don't get up" and "Get up".
A high stress situation, after a high speed pursuit, and you see a suspect (which the victim was, for being in a car during a high speed pursuit), who was (speculation here) in good to great physical shape getting out of the vehicle.
Several unknowns to me (but I assume are known to others):
1) was there a second deputy on the scene
2) how much time elapsed from when the chase ended, to when the officer had the suspects/victims get out of the vehicle
I'm not trying to excuse the officer, and I think he's going to suffer for (what I hope is) a mistake made in haste with no judgement. The lesson to be learned here is in how we react the blink of an eye, where our initial impressions take us.
Posted by: Bill at March 07, 2006 11:00 PM (Z8QiF)
2
I'm not going to say what I
really think ought to be done to that cop; because if I did, you'd think I'd dropped straight out of the 13th century. Or maybe straight out of ancient Rome.
Since we live in an effete society, I guess I'll have to settle for hoping they throw the book at that cop. And for the realization that the karma on this one has
got to be a bitch.
Posted by: Paul Burgess at March 08, 2006 04:49 AM (7EVyU)
3
ok I always do this:
I put other people I care for on that situation so as not to be bias.
What would I think if that person (the one who was shot) be my dad?
What would I think if that person (the one who was shot) be myself?
What would I think if that person (the one who was shot) be my son?
What would I think if that person (the one who was shot) was the POPE?
I guess, I hope this person gets locked for life so as protect people from him. If this guy is out, the next person could be whoever....God knows what else he has done before...he was just caught this time on time...If it were not for the tape, this police officer would be working outside on the streets by know "protecting" the citizens.....GOSH if this is public safety I don't want to know what is not safety for these people....
Posted by: gina at March 09, 2006 07:15 PM (gMuJ+)
4
Forget the liberal spin that he was an Iraq veteran. The perp was in a high-speed car chase. I don't care what war he was in, nobody gets to terrorize our city streets in THIS country!!
Do you think the DA would have filed charges if the cop had been white?? Do you think the (white) DA is throwing this equally brave, 9-years on the frontlines of crime, policeman "under the bus" because he's black??
Posted by: redwhitenblue4evr at March 10, 2006 10:57 AM (P7+58)
5
Are you fucking insane? He was the fucking passenger and he was trying to comply with the cop. I would hope ANY cop who abused his authority so egregiously would get locked up.
The man went to fucking Iraq. He put his life on the line for 14 months for what? To come home and be shot by an idiot egomaniac cop?
To be clear, the DRIVER of the car was NOT injured. Only the passenger. If I was a cop in this situation, I'd be more worried about the driver who evidently had a reason for not wanting to stop.
Posted by: caltechgirl at March 10, 2006 11:58 AM (/vgMZ)
6
Sorry for the gramatical errors on my last post.
My dear redwhiteandblue4ever or whatever your name is. Are you out of your mind? this untrained psycho cop shot an innocent person who was following orders. And yes, I don't care if he was a iraq vet or a babysitter, nobody deserve to be treated that way from a police. Period. The guy was on the floor, he surrended.He was an unarmed person. He meant no harm to anybody. There is not such a law out there that says "if you are a cop and there is a car chase, shoot them, and try to kill them please because "nobody gets to terrorize our city streets on this country" so kill them.
And yes the cop got to terrorize the city that day. A car chase is a car chase, the cops job is to stop them and lock them up not to shoot them.
Get over it. Our taxes are going to pay a big settlement because of these untrained hero wannabe.
A car chase is no excuse for killing. You can't fight crime with crime. The police is out there to protect us not to attempt to kill us everytime we do or say something not on the books. This guy could had been paralyzed because of this criminal (thecop)
Get over it.
Gina
Posted by: GINA AGAIN at March 10, 2006 12:39 PM (gMuJ+)
7
Sorry for the gramatical errors on my last post.
My dear redwhiteandblue4ever or whatever your name is. Are you out of your mind? this untrained psycho cop shot an innocent person who was following orders. And yes, I don't care if he was a iraq vet or a babysitter, nobody deserve to be treated that way from a police officer or whoever. Period. The guy was on the floor, he surrended. He was an unarmed person. He meant no harm to anybody. There is not such a law out there that says "if you are a cop, and there is a car chase, shoot them, and try to kill them please because "nobody gets to terrorize our city streets on this country" so kill them.
And yes the cop got to terrorize the city that day. A car chase is a car chase, the cops job is to stop them, and lock them up, NOT TO SHOOT THEM, THAT IS CALLED "ABUSE OF AUTHORITY" "ATTEMPTED MURDER" (ITS A CRIME, SO YOU KNOW). The fact that your are wearing a uniform doesn't mean you can violate the civil rights of the people, not even the ones who brake the law because they also have civil rights.
Get over it. Our taxes are going to pay a big settlement because of these untrained hero wannabe.
A car chase is no excuse for killing. You can't fight crime with crime. The police is out there to protect us not to attempt to kill us everytime we do or say something not on the books. This guy could had been paralyzed because of this criminal (thecop)
Get over it.
Gina
Posted by: GINA AGAIN at March 10, 2006 12:49 PM (gMuJ+)
8
I've been following this case, and I am outraged. Police officers should be held to a HIGHER STANDARD than ordinary citizens, because they are empowered with the public trust, and are licensed to use deadly force when REQUIRED and JUSTIFIED.
It seems to me that the police officer is being offered concessions in this case because he is a police officer, and it is Elio and his family that are being "short-changed" here.
Regardless of the situation, this police officer made serious errors which leads me to believe, he left his vehicle, intending to shoot someone out of rage, regardless of what happened when he confronted the vehicle occupants...Likewise, why is he focused on the passenger and not the driver (think about it, if you are stopped for speeding, does the officer approach your passenger and ask for their license and registration?). Being caught up in adrenaline is not a legitimate argument...that's what officers are trained for, to act according to the law in stressful situations, and "Uphold the Public Trust". The argument that's been thrown around between Webb saying "Get Up" and thinking he was saying "Don't get up", is no defense, because like any firearm holder, he is still responsible/liable for EVERY bullet that leaves his gun, and he clearly told Elio one thing, and then acted oppositely when Elio complied with the demands of this Police Officer. Likewise Webb, hours after the shooting, stated he felt Elio was going to "charge" him, and that is why he fired (found in the not-so-public 400 page investigation document, but which has been stated in other news articles)...watching the video clearly shows this "perceived threat" was not justified. Days later, when Webb was interviewed, he states he felt Elio was going to reach for a gun, and that is why he fired...again, the video shows that "perceived threat" was not justified. A justified threat is the same today, as yesterday...why does "Deputy" Webb's story change?
I ask myself, can we trust our law officers. If those upholding the law are no more "trustworthy" than "Johnny Crack-Head". Our Second Amendment right is for protection of self, family and country, by being able to keep and bear arms--The historical case of U.S vs. Emerson established the precedence of that right for individuals, and NOT just members of militias.
Replace the disgraceful police officer with "Johnny Crack-Head". That guy would have been jailed immediately, and would be facing much more serious charges. Likewise, a concealed weapons permit holder (in my state) would be found legal using force against "Johnny Crack-Head" to protect Elio (or any third-party)--not the case in defending him from a "rouge Deputy". Now place back Deputy Webb, who was commiting a Second Degree Felony by trying to kill Elio. replace Elio with anyone (ignore his service in Iraq, ignore his ethnic background), it's still the same. It was unjustified, it was a crime, and By Hell, California better prosecute this bastard to the fullest extent of the "uncorrupted" law (which seems to exist in San Bernardino).
Guns do not kill people. People kill people with whatever weapon is handy, be it a gun, knife, or other make-shift weapon. Our police officers just happen to be granted the right to carry and use loaded guns, and as such, they should be upheld to the highest penalty, and the highest letter of the law, as they are also provided the highest level of trust.
Posted by: blc at March 21, 2006 04:31 PM (gtpSP)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Check local listings!
WooHooooo!
House is on at 9 (new ep: Sex Kills), and TAR is on at 10!
For once, I can watch both!
So stoked!
Posted by: caltechgirl at
12:21 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 27 words, total size 1 kb.
March 06, 2006
Rest in Peace, Kirby
After suffering a massive stroke yesterday at his home in Arizona, family members chose to remove Hall of Famer Kirby Puckett from life support this afternoon, and he passed away at age 45.
Not surprisingly, the Strib has a
great story on one of the good guys:
"Puckett rose from a Chicago housing project and became a Minnesota sports icon, bursting onto the scene as a rookie in 1984 with an energetic style and an effervescent smile, each all his own.
He led the Twins to the World Series in 1987 and 1991, leaping into walls as their center fielder and swinging with a might that belied his stocky, 5-8 frame.
He often said he played every game as if it were his last, and sure enough, on March 28, 1996, Puckett awoke with blurred vision in his right eye.
He never played again. He was diagnosed with glaucoma and retired on July 12, 1996.
For the next five years, Puckett remained a smiling fixture on the Minnesota scene, working as an executive vice president for the Twins in an ambassadorial role.
In 2001, he became a first-ballot inductee into the National Baseball Hall of Fame with 2,304 career hits, 10 All-Star selections and six Gold Glove Awards."
Despite some trying times, including never substantiated allegations of abuse and sexual harassment, Kirby's legacy is that of a star fallen too soon, and now, gone too soon.
I'm a huge Dodger fan, but Kirby Puckett was always one of my favorites, and I will miss him. May his family have peace in this difficult time.
Posted by: caltechgirl at
05:25 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 269 words, total size 2 kb.
Do something good for a Soldier's family
Sgt. Rickey Jones of Kokomo, IN was killed last week in an IED attack north of Baghdad.
His grieving family not only has to pick up the pieces after his death, but they also have had to put up with harassment that no family should be forced to bear, especially not the grieving family of a hero.
Since learning of the tragedy, the Jones family's home has been vandalized, and they have received a number of telephone calls proclaiming "I'm glad your son is dead".
Guess who is behind the attacks? The one and only "Rev." Fred Phelps. And his group may show up at this soldier's funeral too. The full story is
here.
Kate of
KateSpot and her friend Lauren are collecting email messages of support for the family. Please leave a comment here or at
Kate's, and I will send them along. Let the family know how much their sacrifice is appreciated and remind them that not everyone in the world thinks like Phelps and his thugs.
Posted by: caltechgirl at
02:08 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 179 words, total size 1 kb.
1
thank you for bringing this story to our attention.
Sgt. Rickey Jones was a hero. Thank you for your service.
Posted by: wRitErsbLock at March 07, 2006 06:01 AM (r5SpX)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
I've been Memed!
Tagged by
Oddybobo with this one:
1) Two favorite colors: Green and Purple
2) Two least favorite colors: Orange and Olive
3) Favorite fast food restaurant: In CA:Original Tommy's and In'N'Out; In NC: Chick-Fil-A and Bojangles
4) Favorite day of the week: Friday
5) Least favorite day of the week: Sunday
6) Best thing about your significant other: Hugs and Kisses
7) Least favorite thing about your significant other: He loses things a lot.
Your significant others favorite thing about you (without asking them): my chestal area and/or my hair
9) Your significant others least favorite thing about you (again, without asking them): That I always AM right.
10) Black or white? Grey
11) Red or blue? Purple
12) Day or night? Night
13) Favorite part of your body: My hair
14) Least favorite part about your body. My tummy
15) Do you like walking in the rain at times? Anytime
16) Do you have a tattoo? Nope. Terrified of needles
17) “Short and sweet” or “long and hard”. It depends. What are you asking about **wink**
1
Favorite kind of car: small, sporty, FAST.
19) Favorite kind of ice cream: B and J Oatmeal Chocolate Cookie.
20) Trix or Lucky Charms? Neither. Wasn't allowed to have sugar cereal as a kid. Love Bran Flakes, though.
Tagging Bou, VW, and Amanda, Just for the heck of it
Posted by: caltechgirl at
01:55 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 235 words, total size 2 kb.
Posted by: VW Bug at March 06, 2006 02:00 PM (s7xYD)
2
"chestal area" that's a new one! :-)
Posted by: Oddybobo at March 06, 2006 02:31 PM (6Gm0j)
3
You love Bran Flakes? You don't buy sugar cereal now that you can? I ODed on it as a kid -- who knows what my mother was thinking!! Feeding us Frosted Flakes and Wonder bread. Blech!!!
Posted by: Marie at March 07, 2006 11:40 AM (ZNESr)
4
The first time I took a trip to the South, I kept seeing billboards for Chick-Fil-A and I asked Nin (who's from TN) what the heck they were, since I'd never heard of them before. Except I pronounced it chick filla -- sort of like Bob Villa -- and it's been a source of etenral amusement to her ever since. I still pronounce it that way
Posted by: Ith at March 07, 2006 01:10 PM (0ectA)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
March 04, 2006
Eat this Coach K
Carolina WINS!!!!!
83-76
Love those Tar Heels! This pretty much says it all:
Bobby Frasor dominates Duke's Sean Dockery
AP courtesy tarheelblue.com
In honor of our victory, Our
Alma Mater:
Hark the sound of Tar Heel voicesRinging clear and TrueSinging Carolina's praisesShouting N.C.U.
Hail to the brightest Star of allClear its radiance shineCarolina priceless gem,Receive all praises thine.
I'm a Tar Heel born, I'm a Tar Heel bredAnd when I die I'm a Tar Heel dead.So it's RAH, RAH, Car'lina 'linaRAH, RAH, Car'lina 'linaRAH, RAH, Car'linaRAH! RAH! RAH! 'Neath the oaks the sons true hearted Homage pay to thee Time worn walls give back their echo Hail to U.N.C. Though the storms of life assail us Still our hearts beat true Naught can break the friendships formed at Dear old N.C.U.Click the link to hear the music and words by the UNC Band and Choir, and sing along!
Don't forget to stomp.
Posted by: caltechgirl at
10:50 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 152 words, total size 3 kb.
March 03, 2006
Sad Friday
Two of my favorite bloggers called it quits yesterday.
I can't say I fault them, as both of them want to spend more time with their families, but I will miss them both very much.
Take a moment and drop by and tell Cobb and Margi how much they will be missed.
Posted by: caltechgirl at
09:47 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 56 words, total size 1 kb.
1
A certain comment over at my place has been edited.
Thank you for your friendship, sweetheart. And, of course, the link-love.

xoxo
Posted by: Margi at March 03, 2006 12:08 PM (BRtaN)
2
Sorry to see Cobb and Margi leave the Blogosphere but this blogger can certainly feel the pressure. Good fortunes to them bothÂ…
Posted by: Edd at March 04, 2006 05:51 AM (vqBrI)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
March 01, 2006
I'm taking a poll...
I am seriously thinking of cutting my hair....
These two
lovely ladies did it, and I'm thinking of jumping on the bandwagon.
My hair is my one vanity, see, and that makes it hard. It's brown/auburn, slightly wavy (more so when it's shorter) hangs almost to my rear and is super thick, so it knots constantly and there's not much I can do with it other that a simple knot or one of the vast array of charming
Princess Leia hairdos.
and I'm tired of putting it up in a knot everyday....
I want something shorter, with a lot of body to it. I think that would be fun
and look nice...
Thinking of something like
this. What do you think? (Eva's hair, not Tony's :-) )
here's a similar style....
Posted by: caltechgirl at
04:26 PM
| Comments (23)
| Add Comment
Post contains 135 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Oh go on, be daring, get a 'do like Tony's! Just think low maintenance, cool in summer ...
Posted by: Amanda at March 01, 2006 04:45 PM (L4Sch)
2
Without knowing your face shape, it's hard to say what I would think of it.
But you, darling, must LOVE it...so go with your gut.
Posted by: Dana at March 01, 2006 04:47 PM (euBkS)
3
It's a great look! I say go for it... ;-) It'll always grow back if you decide you like it better long.
Posted by: Marie at March 01, 2006 04:51 PM (ZNESr)
4
What Dana said

When I went from below my shoulders, to short and spikey, it was a shock, but I adored it.
Posted by: Ith at March 01, 2006 04:57 PM (2EfyX)
5
I'm with the rest of them. Do it and if you don't like it, it'll grow out. I like my hair shoulder length or a little shorter myself... and if your hair already has some curl... I think it would be fun. Then again, you should have seen me every 6 months to a year when I was working. My co-workers swore I did it for the shock value. Short and straight, grow it out and curl it, always worn up, then always just pulled away from the face. I love changing my hair. I finally found one I liked, but can't afford it any more.
Posted by: VW Bug at March 01, 2006 05:34 PM (hFP+9)
6
I think it would look great! You should take advantage of your waves. Some people pay good money to have them!!! My hair hair has natural wave to it and does much better shorter. And it is so easy to fix. I just blow dry my hair with my head upside down for about 3 minutes and let it air dry the rest.
Would it be long enough that you could pull it back if you wanted to?
And it will always grow out! Have you thought about Locks of Love?
Posted by: Amy at March 01, 2006 05:52 PM (UxaeN)
7
Two Junes ago I chopped my hair and donated it to Locks of Love. I love that I did that, but the short 'do was quite traumatic, especially for darling hubby. Now it just won't grow fast enough, although it is finally nearing mid-back again. If I ever cut it again, I'll donate it again, because it's the right thing to do.
So if you have enough and decide to hack it off, please consider donating your hair.
Growing up. my best friend had alopecia (sp?) which is the genetic condition that prevents your from growing hair. It's so hard for children who have to wear wigs.
Whatever you decide, do it for you, not for anyone else.
Posted by: wRitErsbLock at March 01, 2006 07:12 PM (0Pi1o)
8
In my quite possibly mistaken opinion, the Eva cut could work, and definitely much more so than the "Meg Ryan trying to look less 'cute'" cut at the second link. You'd need to consider your own shape and size specifically, but Eva's is nice for (relatively) short and wavy.
Posted by: Jay at March 01, 2006 07:22 PM (a6pw5)
9
Being a guy I'm sure my oppinion doesn't count, but I think longer hair is better. Those pictures are just way too short for my taste.
Posted by: Contagion at March 01, 2006 07:29 PM (e8b4J)
10
I think there is much to consider. First, I'm into Locks of Love in a big way. Your hair is long enough that you could give the length they want and still have long hair. So consider that.
I think that going too short may shock you. You've had this beautifully long hair for a long time. I'm going to suggest going something more at just past the shoulders. You will be AMAZED at how much body it has at shoulder length. Mine comes just past my shoulders and when mine was down the middle of my back it had a much different look... very weighted.
So going just to shoulders, with a style, is a start. Then if you like it, go the next step to neck, then chin. I'd work up to it. And I say this from experience.
Also, last, what does your husband think? And not that it matters as its YOUR hair, but my husband likes long hair and although I get very adament that its "MY HAIR DAMMIT!" and he supports that, when I get it cut too short (and I have gone very short) I know he doesn't like it even though he would NEVER say it and it wears on me mentally.
So... those are my thoughts. There are no wrong answers however... as it always grows back!!!
Posted by: Bou at March 01, 2006 07:59 PM (iHxT3)
11
Go Locks of Love baby!!!!
Free haircut and it's a good cause. PLus, maybe it will make me brave enough to finally cut mine. What do you think? Should we forma haircutting pact?
Posted by: Sarah at March 01, 2006 08:05 PM (E6f+8)
12
Well, I think the chance to do something different is tempting, but I wouldn't chop it. Of course, look at my hair - I wouldn't necessarily call it wild! I would go for a mid-boobage cut that has the ends so graciously curving around you-know-where. Although, I'm curious to see what you end up doing - maybe you'll convince me to do something new!
Posted by: Sharon at March 01, 2006 08:46 PM (pgnbp)
13
Those styles are gorgeous!
As further encouragement, there was enough of my hair left to be collected and donated to a group that makes wigs for cancer patients.
As long and thick as your hair is, they could make two, maybe three, wigs for those in need...
; )
Posted by: Christina at March 01, 2006 09:23 PM (zJsUT)
14
Okay, I'm gradually beginning to believe that you're my secret twin, which is a little creepy, but in any case, I vote no. This is strictly based on my own personal prejudices as a fellow thick-curly-hair-to-my-butt person. I've worn mine up in the same bun for about a year, but it's better than it being short, because when it is, it gets all poofy and I have no way of controlling it. When it's long, it can be tamed.
Posted by: Katie at March 01, 2006 10:23 PM (ZDYYP)
15
Well, on the one hand those are cool hairstyles. On the other hand, and I guess this is a guy's perspective (cf. Contagion, above), my attitude is that,
ceteris paribus, longer is better than shorter.
("
Ceteris paribus"??! :-)
Posted by: Paul Burgess at March 02, 2006 05:52 AM (7EVyU)
Posted by: jen at March 02, 2006 06:26 AM (UMVKj)
17
Cool! I'm considering locks of love too. I have thick ass-length hair and I'm sick of not being able to do much with it except pull it up or braid it cause it is always knotting up. I have gone super short in the past and loved it. I've gone shoulder length and loved it. I really like the second picture too.
Posted by: oddybobo at March 02, 2006 07:33 AM (6Gm0j)
18
Like the guys before I tend to think longer the hair the better. However, not to long ago my wife cut her hair shorter and I like it, and as Bou mentioned, I think if your hair is pretty long that you should try at or slightly below the shoulders first. But who am I to say I use a razor on mine most of the time.
Posted by: Tige at March 02, 2006 08:34 AM (QgCnE)
19
I'm not crazy. I feel strongly both ways.
Posted by: Jim - PRS at March 02, 2006 11:48 PM (njBz/)
20
Okay, as for the whole knotting-up issue -- I strongly recommend getting the book "Curly Girl" by Lorraine Massey, swearing off shampoo, and discarding your hairbrush. Really. I have huge amounts of thick wavy knot-prone hair, and with proper use of conditioner and finger-combing, I've not used a hairbrush or shampoo in about a month, my hair is softer than it's ever been, smells great, and is completely knot-free. I realize this goes against everything anyone's ever told you about haircare and hygiene, but before you lop your hair off for being knotty, try it for a few weeks. And if you decide then to cut it then, you'll be giving Locks of Love healthier, stronger hair.
Posted by: Katie at March 03, 2006 12:54 AM (ZDYYP)
21
Hell no. It doesn't have to be down to your butt, but PLEASE keep it past your shoulders.
Long hair is sexy.
Posted by: Geoffrey at March 03, 2006 07:24 AM (F/kLy)
22
My opinion is to be taken with a grain of salt because DH resists my cutting THE HAIR ON MY HEAD, EVER.
But here goes:
It's only hair. No matter WHAT you do to it, be it permanent wave, bleaching, coloring, cutting -- it's going to come back. So do what you want to it! Enjoy!
You'll know where to find me at The Old Folks' Home: I'll be the white/gray-haired old lady with purple streaks running through it.
Mwheh!
xoxo
Posted by: Margi at March 03, 2006 12:10 PM (BRtaN)
23
I've managed to save up roughly $28640 in my bank account, but I'm not sure if I should buy a house or not. Do you think the market is stable or do you think that home prices will decrease by a lot?
Posted by: Courtney Gidts at May 19, 2006 10:49 AM (ZILko)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
101kb generated in CPU 0.0204, elapsed 0.0317 seconds.
35 queries taking 0.0178 seconds, 135 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.