January 31, 2006
Here Kitty Kitty.....

you're an evil kitty! O_o wow you are crazy. your sole purpose is to rule the world but no one can really take you seriously. i dont blame them
^^
o_O What weird creature are you? O_ofrom a sweet and somewhat unexpected
Llama. Not one of
these, though
Posted by: caltechgirl at
10:22 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 53 words, total size 1 kb.
1
LOL> that is one funny cat
Posted by: Elizabeth at February 01, 2006 12:03 PM (ceeh7)
2
wow your a lemur! you completly RAWK! ^^ you love to be completly weird and just in general you freak people out O_o your particular species of lemur is the ring tailed lemur.
Posted by: vw bug at February 01, 2006 05:40 PM (OD3ab)
3
Wow! It's.... uh.... kinda cute!! Yeah, that's it... cute.

::hopeful grin while backing away::
Posted by: Richmond at February 01, 2006 06:06 PM (e8QFP)
4
soooo...you're a satanic cat....interesting... No wonder you are such good friends with Contagion!
Posted by: ktreva at February 01, 2006 06:50 PM (e8b4J)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Kick A$$!
Guess who has the
#1 record in the NHL so far this year (hint: see the sidebar, or below)
more...
Posted by: caltechgirl at
04:45 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 26 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Yawn......no one rememebers (or cares about) who wins the President's Trophy. Lord Stanely's is the one that matters.
Posted by: the Pirate at February 01, 2006 07:32 AM (0ZKi5)
2
And the #1 Ranking in ESPN is a CURSE! Shit we got it one year and then proceeded to lose 536 games to injury.
I do recall when the 'canes were the the
Whalers.
Posted by: the Pirate at February 01, 2006 07:48 AM (0ZKi5)
3
Go Canes! CalTechGirl, I'm always pleased to see you cheering on the Hurricanes. If only they had this year while you were still living in NC! (And yes I know they made it to the Stanley Cup while you were here).
Posted by: Super G at February 01, 2006 07:51 PM (1R6Yk)
4
I was in Toronto when the Canes knocked them out to get to the finals. Oh man were they pissed about getting beat by a team from backwoods-redneck land.
Posted by: the Pirate at February 01, 2006 09:47 PM (Rg0+S)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Going Postal, again
From the
Ass.Press, via Yahoo!:
"A former postal worker who had been put on medical leave for psychological problems shot five people to death at a huge mail-processing center and then killed herself in what was believed to be the nation's deadliest workplace shooting ever carried out by a woman.
The attack Monday night was also the biggest bloodbath at a U.S. postal installation since a massacre 20 years ago helped give rise to the term "going postal.""
Holy Crap! Goleta is the hometown of UCSB, and this facility is just a couple of blocks off campus. Good thing she offed herself rather than going on a worse rampage.
Posted by: caltechgirl at
03:48 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 112 words, total size 1 kb.
I want to be in the Bad Example Clan because....
Harvey is really my (blog)father and he
won't recognize me otherwise.
Quote: "That's not MY nose..."
My mama and my brothers and sisters love me and accept me, (blog)Dad, so why won't you? Please?
Don't leave me out here in the cold. It's so lonely and scary... *sniff, sniff*...
Posted by: caltechgirl at
01:17 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 69 words, total size 1 kb.
1
There's no whining in . . . Aw hell! I accept you too!
Posted by: oddybobo at January 31, 2006 01:27 PM (6Gm0j)
2
Wait, who are you? *snicker*
Posted by: Contagion at January 31, 2006 02:13 PM (e8b4J)
3
I still love you!
I think you and Laughing Wolf need to pool your campaign resources. He seems to be having familial issues as well.
Posted by: Ith at January 31, 2006 03:07 PM (+T0G3)
4
Come and sit by me!! I have wine
and chocolate....
Posted by: Richmond at January 31, 2006 04:27 PM (e8QFP)
5
Looks like you're all vouched up. Just need the quote & tartan in the sidebar...
Posted by: Harvey at February 02, 2006 06:57 AM (ubhj8)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Congratulations Mr. Justice!
Samuel A. Alito, Jr. was confirmed as the 110th Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States this morning by a vote of 58-42.
He was subsequently sworn in and will make his debut as Associate Justice at tonight's State of the Union Address.
It's nice when good things happen in spite of a**holes, don't you think?
Posted by: caltechgirl at
11:37 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 65 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I think I am gonna like da judge. I like the way he made the dim-a-crits look like the raving slobbering at the fat jowls fools that they are.
Posted by: GUYK at January 31, 2006 12:24 PM (iAhlK)
2
Well, yes, it is nice when "good" things happen, unfortunately, I disagree with this being a "good thing" because of his record of writings on executive power and promoting the expansion thereof.
I believe in the checks and balances system put in place by the founders. It is too bad that so many partisans cannot see past the present holder of the office of President to the long-term effects of the changes being made today to remove the checks on executive power. What will be said by the current cheerleaders when a member of a different party is President and exercises these same expanded powers, I wonder...
Never forget the law of unintended consequences.
Posted by: Jack at January 31, 2006 06:25 PM (ne61C)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
The jokes, they write themselves...
So I was tooling down the freeway to work this morning when the traffic began to stop rather unexpectedly in front of me. I quickly started flipping AM stations to find one that might tell me what the traffic situation in front of me was, and somehow I ended up on KFI. Which at 10:15 AM is airing
Rush Limbaugh.
For the record, while I used to be quite the Rush fan, I haven't listened to him since Clinton was in his first term. I honestly can't stand him, and most days I would have just changed the channel again, but today he said something that caught my attention.
Paraphrasing here, he said that in the 18 years he's been doing the broadcast, every crazy joke, satire, or parody of the Democrats that he has come up with, they have done on their own, and that after last night, he doesn't see how he can parody them anymore. The jokes it seems, are already being lived by the loonies on the left.
Explaining himself further, El Rushbo cited two things: first, tonight's planned demonstration outside the capital wherein a bunch of idiots (my word here, I believe he called them "60's retreads") plan to stand outside the building during the SOTU speech tonight and bang pots and pans together in an effort to drown out the noise inside the building.
As if. Can you just imagine the Usual Suspects (ELF, ANSWER, NOW, PETA, Code Pinkos, NARAL, et al) standing out there in the cold banging pots and pans together like a bunch of toddlers on crack? How many of them do you think will forget to bring earplugs and cause themselves permanent damage? How do they plan on holding their protest signs with pots in both hands? Or will they "work together" and hold the pots in one hand, banging them against each other's pots, holding their signs of love and peace in the other hand?
Here's the actual website announcing the protest. You too can join in, as these events will be taking place around the country tonight... Like they can hear the noise in DC from Bisbee, Arizona of all places.
The other thing Rush referred to was this article by Dana Milbank of the WaPo. (reg. req. go to bugmenot)
The article is entitled "Tasting Victory, Liberals Instead Have a Food Fight". Here's just a taste:
"Right on cue, liberal activists including Cindy Sheehan and Ramsey Clark gathered yesterday at the Busboys & Poets restaurant and bookshop at 14th and V streets NW for what they billed as a forum on "The Impeachment of President George W. Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney." But the participants, while charging the administration with "crimes against humanity," a "war of aggression" and even "the supreme international crime," inevitably turned their wrath on congressional Democrats, whom they regarded as a bunch of wimps.
"Does the Democratic Party want to continue to exist or does it want to ignore what 85 percent of its supporters want?" demanded David Swanson, a labor union official who runs "Impeach PAC" and other efforts to remove Bush from office. Singling out Senate Democratic leader Harry Reid (Nev.) for derision, Swanson said that Democrats who do the right thing "are exceptions.""
Later on, they discussed ways to remove the President from office:
"After the participants made their urgent calls for impeachment proceedings, John Bruhns, identifying himself as an antiwar Iraq veteran, rose for a clarification. If Democrats don't first "gain control of one of the houses" of Congress, he wondered, "how else can we impeach this monster?"
Swanson had a ready brushoff for Democrats who won't pursue impeachment because they're in the minority: "Just go home if you're going to talk that way." Offering the lessons of 1994, he said: "The way the Republicans got the majority was not by being scared. . . . It was by going out and speaking on behalf of their base and letting themselves be called radicals."
Bruhns, wearing a crew cut and business suit, disagreed. Somebody in the audience called for him to "shut up."
"They didn't answer my question," Bruhns protested after the exchange ended. "How do you get impeachment if you don't win elections? I'm being practical."
...
"Sheehan, in a sweet voice, condemned the administration's agenda "to spread the cancer of empire."
The first questioner, getting into the spirit of the forum, declared of the administration: "These criminals and gangsters, thugs as I regard them, I believe engineered 9/11."
Many in the crowd applauded. But others were skeptical. "I've heard a lot about accountability" from the panel, said one questioner. "Seems to me the first opportunity we had for accountability was in the last election."
"Elections," moderator Zeese replied, "are not the determining factor.""
[emphasis mine] Read the
whole thing.
If I was a Democrat today, I'd be ashamed. Sincerely. If the rants of Kerry and Kennedy yesterday weren't evidence enough, banging pots and an almost institutional inability to do simple addition (not enough votes!) brings me to the conclusion that the Democratic party leadership are nothing more than a bunch of toddlers.
Let's see: Whiny? Check. Unable to add numbers? Check. Irrational sense that their way is the only way, even when it's clearly impossible? Check. A belief that increased volume equates to increased chance of getting their way? Check.
I can't wait to see what childish stunts they pull tonight inside the Capital, too.
Posted by: caltechgirl at
11:29 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 917 words, total size 6 kb.
1
Sometimes I wonder if the American public, both Democrats and Republicans, have any base in reality anymore.
Posted by: Contagion at January 31, 2006 12:34 PM (Q5WxB)
2
Hmm...well, I am praying that more moderately minded Dems will take a firm grip on the far left and strangle them to within an inch of their lives.
I believe that they have finally fallen off the edge of the world, as they are making it very hard to call myself a Democrat too... But then hey, I voted for the president, so I guess that I broke free from this nonsence a lot earlier...
Posted by: grandmofftrojan at January 31, 2006 04:28 PM (7/GeE)
3
"like a bunch of toddlers on crack" heee heee heee
Re: Childish stunts -- Did you see the smirk on Hillary's face? It seemed like they kept showing her & Kerry (at least on FOX) for their reactions.
Posted by: Marie at February 01, 2006 12:36 PM (ZNESr)
4
Re: Marie
This answer is correct to the last cent; you've cut it very fine!
Posted by: Tony at February 03, 2006 11:43 AM (6aVcm)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 30, 2006
Portrait of the Senator as a Loony
Ted Kennedy is many things: a liar, a drunk, a blowhard, perhaps even a murderer, but I never knew he was a stand-up comedian until today.
Kennedy's rant on the Senate floor against Sam Alito was a treasure to behold. You can see the Senator puffing and blowing here.
I swear, the only reason I left it on C-SPAN2 is that I thought he was going to keel over from a heart attack right there on the Senate floor.
All that effort, and cloture passed with 72 votes. Suck it Ted and Johnny. I'm sure Massachussetts is very proud of you.
Michelle Malkin, as always, has more.
Welcome visitors from Expose the Left! Feel free to click around, and come back often if you like what you see.
Posted by: caltechgirl at
05:25 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 142 words, total size 1 kb.
The Good Stein
One more before I go try to take a nap, Ben Stein
takes on Joel Stein.
I knew there was a reason I liked this guy.
h/t Greyhawk
PS Watching C-SPAN 2 right now, and for the record, John Kerry is a blowhard who has ABSOLUTELY NO CLUE what the fuck he is talking about. Flip Flop alert!
Posted by: caltechgirl at
01:04 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 64 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I just love Ben Stein too. And I don't know how you can watch Kerry -- honestly, the man makes me queasy!
Posted by: Richmond at January 31, 2006 04:09 AM (e8QFP)
2
I love Ben Stein. Great article.
Posted by: vw bug at January 31, 2006 12:17 PM (OD3ab)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Very Little from me today
I'm feeling rotten.
All this weekend I was dealing with an RA flare, and as soon as I get better (last night) I must have eaten something that was bad. After spending most of the late evening dealing with various stomach-related issues, I decided it was best to nurse my poor, painful tummy and stay home and finish correcting HW and write an exam for the class I'm teaching.
However, if you insist on something interesting to read, try these non-political gems:
Bou wraps up the school carnival
Ith's resident office mouse is a smartie
Margi writes Peanut's birth story
Posted by: caltechgirl at
12:43 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 110 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Hope you're feeling better soon.
Posted by: Ith at January 30, 2006 01:05 PM (+T0G3)
2
Oh, bless, I hope you are well recovered by now.
; )
Posted by: Christina at January 30, 2006 04:00 PM (zJsUT)
3
Silly girl...you didn't tell me this earlier!
Hope you are feeling better!
Posted by: Amanda at January 30, 2006 05:18 PM (IkWgY)
4
Oh nooo. I hope you are better soon. My friend I told you about is trying something new for her RA. I will have to ask her about it tomorrow...
Posted by: Bou at January 30, 2006 07:57 PM (iHxT3)
5
I hope you're feeling better today!
Posted by: Marie at January 31, 2006 06:59 AM (ZNESr)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 29, 2006
Hello, Grandma?
Glenn links to
this interesting post at Dr. Helen's site about Grandparents who don't have time to grandparent, based on
this article. He asks if these are the same parents who were too busy to be parents, and Dr. Helen wonders if the lack of relationship between children and the extended family keeps them from understanding close human interactions or makes them believe that love is really only about material things. The answer is:
well, DUH.
I can just see these women who don't want to be Grandma. Twenty years ago, these were the self-obsessed, career driven mothers of my friends. Trying to be there for the after-school pick up and the PTA, but not worrying overly much if the kids had to walk home or the PTA brownies came from the grocery store. Too busy with their own lives to consider that the "safe" neighborhood the kids walked home through was still dangerous after dark, that the grocery store brownies told all the other kids that you didn't really care, that you were too busy for your kid.
And Hell Yes, we made fun of those kids.
The 80s was all about the Superwoman. Could Mom work outside the home and still have a clean house and take care of the kids? The consensus was that something had to give. For a lot of these women, it was the precious moments with their kids, the small kindnesses that mean so much, and the closeness that the rest of us shared with our moms. Yet they fooled themselves that because the house was clean and the kids were doing well in school that they could have it all.
Somehow it was never important to be there, to make time. And now that their children are parents, these now grown-up children realize what they missed, and they want that for their own children. So they make time, they skip meetings and make brownies, they ask Grandma and Grandpa to spend time with the kids, and they are still disappointed.
But it's more than that. Being Grandma is being old. Hell, most of our grandmothers were at least in their 70s. For the most part, they weren't active, independently wealthy, and still working in their chosen career. Our grandmas were cooks and knitters and nurturers, with their silver hair and never ending fount of kleenex and hard candies. Today's grandmas are tech-saavy, go to work every morning, and command respect outside the home. If you were a balls-to-the-wall coroporate type, would you want to be called ANYTHING that brings to mind a blue haired woman in a rocker?
And being Grandma is an imposition. After all, it wasn't their choice to have babies, toddlers, and children around again. Their kids did this to them. The author of the article even says this in reference to her grandchildren:
Look, I'd love to nip over and whisper secrets into 1-month-old Maggie's ears, or to dress 2-year-old Ryan in the black leather jacket I bought her recently and take her to look for late blackberries in Golden Gate Park on my bike (with its deluxe new kid seat). But I have a job. I'm a reporter, I have two books to write, a husband who wants to go to France, and I just bought an investment property in Portland, Oregon. I love my grandchildren, but being a grandmother got added to my to-do list.
[emphasis mine]
Added to her to-do list. As if she only is Grandma because she has to be. As if she never expected her own children to grow up and have children of their own. Maybe she just doesn't see her own children as self-actualized individuals with lives and loves of their own. Or maybe she didn't want her children to be tied down the way she was. Another Grandma in the article is quoted as saying (paraphrasing here) that while she loves her grandbabies and wants to be a part of their lives, she's not willing to give up her life to deal with them.
If being a grandma is so damn inconvenient, it's a wonder some of the parents of these grandkids were even born so their moms could be grandmas. Hell, Roe has been the law of the land for more than 30 years.
Posted by: caltechgirl at
02:41 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 718 words, total size 4 kb.
1
My mouth dropped when I read about the retired judge. If my Mom was not there when my daughters were born, I would be really hurt. Being there for the birth and helping is not about being a grandparent, but being a loving parent to your child.
Posted by: Amy at January 29, 2006 06:52 PM (JFN4H)
2
While I am a career mom, my sacrifice has been my home. It is in shambles but I wouldn't sacrifice cuddle time for all the clean houses anywhere!
Posted by: oddybobo at January 30, 2006 06:19 AM (6Gm0j)
3
And now from the 'Grammies' in the bunch! *S* I just wish I could be a Grandma to my g/kids; instead, I'm now raising two of them. It somehow seemed easier 20 years ago than it is now.
Posted by: Michele at January 30, 2006 08:21 AM (t4sfV)
4
I'm glad my son's grandmas WANT to see him every chance they get... which isn't even enough! I'll have to come back later & read the full article...
Posted by: Marie at January 30, 2006 09:07 AM (ZNESr)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 27, 2006
And, for the record
I could really give two shits about this whole Google in China brouhaha.
You can have my Gmail account when you pry the keyboard from my cold dead fingers.
Posted by: caltechgirl at
02:44 PM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 36 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Thank God it's not just me! I feel better now.
Posted by: Stingflower at January 27, 2006 03:03 PM (a6pw5)
2
Nothing to do with China, but I never got into using my gmail account. It's just one more languishing free email address

I'm not sure it's even still active considering how long it's been since I logged on.
Posted by: Ith at January 27, 2006 03:28 PM (+T0G3)
3
Yes, it's active. That was one of the ways they distinguished themselves from the others.
Posted by: Jay at January 27, 2006 05:00 PM (NxYzY)
4
LOL! I've not stopped using my gmail account either.
Posted by: vw bug at January 27, 2006 06:13 PM (k+jIa)
5
Now, now, when it comes to search engines, you know that
Gigablast is beckoning...

And the only reason I got a GMail account is so I could chat on Google Talk, which it then turned out nobody else I know has. For my everyday email needs I use
Bluebottle, which has many nifty features including nigh-daily unexplained service outages which can last for hours at a time... Just in case you wanted to know why you were wise to go with GMail instead...
Posted by: Paul Burgess at January 28, 2006 06:04 AM (7EVyU)
6
I don't use google that often, I don't have a gmail account, I could care less.
Posted by: Contagion at January 28, 2006 09:11 AM (e8b4J)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
I'd just like to point out
That the fine folks at
Target.com rule. The shipping estimate for my
end tables was next Monday, and they arrived today.
When we bought the coffee table we had no need for the end tables, so now we have a beat up coffee table and two matching
brand new end tables.... Oh well.
Yay!
Posted by: caltechgirl at
02:27 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 64 words, total size 1 kb.
1
You got the Dolce's??? Awesome! Those have been on my wish list for about two years! Maybe we'll go ahead and by them now for the new house. ;-)
Posted by: Amanda at January 27, 2006 05:56 PM (IkWgY)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Bill Whittle is back!
If only to say he'll be
back soon.... Tease!
Posted by: caltechgirl at
12:17 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 17 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Oh
man! I got a little thrill there... followed by disappointment. A new essay is coming soon I hope! Thanks for the heads up!
Posted by: Richmond at January 28, 2006 02:34 PM (e8QFP)
2
I finally started checking weekly, rather than daily. Now I'm back to some OC behavior with regards to Eject(cubed).
Posted by: physics geek at January 30, 2006 09:56 AM (Xvrs7)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 26, 2006
My Spidey Sense is tingling....
You know, except for that whole being a GIRL thing, I could agree with this one:
Your results:
You are Spider-Man| Spider-Man |
| 95% | | Green Lantern |
| 65% | | Robin |
| 60% | | Supergirl |
| 60% | | Superman |
| 60% | | Wonder Woman |
| 55% | | Hulk |
| 55% | | Iron Man |
| 50% | | Catwoman |
| 40% | | The Flash |
| 35% | | Batman |
| 20% |
| You are intelligent, witty, a bit geeky and have great power and responsibility.
 |
Click here to take the "Which Superhero are you?" quiz...Stolen from
Wonder Woman
Posted by: caltechgirl at
05:04 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 68 words, total size 2 kb.
1
And I was
almost Spidey... Mmmmm -- Tobey Maguire with muscles...
Posted by: Richmond at January 26, 2006 05:41 PM (e8QFP)
2
I'm Green Lantern. The old one. not the original. The second one. Who went crazy. Destroyed the universe. Likes to one punch people. Cause he's Hal Jordan.
I wanted to be the cool, new Green Lantern. Or maybe Batman. All the kids like Batman
Posted by: Bill at January 26, 2006 10:15 PM (ujJj1)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
WooHoo!
Not that any of you care, but my first multi-million dollar grant application is going out the door this afternoon. Well, ok, not mine alone, but I am Co-PI. Holy Crap!
Damn I feel old. This time last year I was writing my thesis.....
Posted by: caltechgirl at
02:49 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 45 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Congratulations! You have just funded yourself a junket to Molokai. Expense under administrative overhead. I really don't know much about the grant game, just thinkng out loud for you.
Posted by: Velociman at January 26, 2006 04:27 PM (f9lXT)
2
Congratulations. Would you write one for me? I could use some more cash.
Posted by: Contagion at January 26, 2006 05:37 PM (e8b4J)
3
Yay! Congrats, um, you know feel free to kick any extra y'all get this way. I'll make sure to, um, research human behavior with it.
Of course by human behavior I mean hot chicks pole dancing and by research I mean hand them $20's during their performances.
Posted by: phin at January 26, 2006 05:46 PM (DGPlf)
4
Can you tell us more about it if it is accepted? What does Co-PI stand for? I can guess to Co, but what is the PI?
Posted by: Amy at January 29, 2006 06:48 PM (JFN4H)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
I guess I'm just a Sci-Fi girl
Note how many of these are ties..... Interestingly the quiz tie-breaker didn't have a choice for Millennium Falcon. As you all know, I'd hang out with Han and Chewie any day.

| You scored as Galactica (Battlestar: Galactica). You are leery of your surroundings, and with good reason. Anyone could be a cylon. But you have close friends and you know they would never hurt you. Now if only the damn XO would stop drinking.
Babylon 5 (Babylon 5) | | 81% |
Galactica (Battlestar: Galactica) | | 81% |
Millennium Falcon (Star Wars) | | 81% |
Serenity (Firefly) | | 81% |
SG-1 (Stargate) | | 81% |
Bebop (Cowboy Bebop) | | 75% |
Moya (Farscape) | | 75% |
Deep Space Nine (Star Trek) | | 63% |
Enterprise D (Star Trek) | | 50% |
FBI's X-Files Division (The X-Files) | | 50% |
Nebuchadnezzar (The Matrix) | | 31% |
Andromeda Ascendant (Andromeda) | | 25% |
Your Ultimate Sci-Fi Profile II: which sci-fi crew would you best fit in? (pics) created with QuizFarm.com |
h/t
Ith, the SG-1 chick
Posted by: caltechgirl at
01:35 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 159 words, total size 4 kb.
January 25, 2006
Is it just me?
Or does the new "
Clorox Anywhere Spray" commercial creep you out too? I mean the woman is spraying the sh*t on clean dishes and FOOD for chrissakes! On food! Even their website advertises that you can safely spray this crap on/near your food.
Umm, no. I don't want to buy your fine product, I'm too busy rewashing all my produce at the moment.
Ewww!
Posted by: caltechgirl at
11:13 PM
| Comments (9)
| Add Comment
Post contains 71 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Contagion at January 26, 2006 05:46 AM (Q5WxB)
2
I haven't seen it either....however "spraying food"...with it ick
Posted by: ArmyWifeToddlerMom at January 26, 2006 06:48 AM (c0Jhg)
3
That just
can't be good for you....
Posted by: Richmond at January 26, 2006 08:29 AM (e8QFP)
4
Haven't seen it, but, um NO WAY! Nothing starting with Clorox will ever touch my food...
Posted by: Marie at January 26, 2006 08:52 AM (ZNESr)
5
When sweetthing and I were in Turkey the medical people on the base recommended that all produce bought on the local economy be washed with a clorox solution to kill e-coli. We didn't but I did peel all of the fruit and cooked the vegestables. I did use the clorix on grapes because grapes are just to damn hard to peel. But once they were rinsed with clean water I couldn't tell they had been bleached.
Posted by: GUYK at January 26, 2006 09:33 AM (iAhlK)
6
I can totally see doing that, as long as you rinse afterward. In the commercial, the woman sprays the stuff on dishes drying in the drainer (presumably to be put away shortly) and on food in the refrigerator, lettuce and something else (that is not usually rinsed before eating, because I remember thinking "you don't wash THAT before eating", like cheese or something).
Also, turns out according to the MSDS that this stuff is far from an "innovation". It's 0.0095% bleach in distilled water.
Might as well just rinse your food and wipe your counters with water. You get more antibacterial action out of the chlorine in regular tap water in some cities.
Posted by: caltechgirl at January 26, 2006 10:34 AM (/vgMZ)
7
I am beginning to think that the advertising moguls are all incredibly anal-retentive. It seems that we are all to have pristine, completely germ free homes.
Germs and exposure to them are part of life and normal and even good - how else can children develop immunities to things?
For example, I am an awful housekeeper and our son, Andy, has grown up with a lot of pets and therefore a lot of germs and dirt tracked through the house and dust and who knows what that was *not* immediately cleaned up, and definitely *not* with disinfectants. The result - a 20 year old kid who has missed all of 3 days of school in his entire life.
In other words, my lack of immediate removal of germs gave Andy a lot of immunity.
Posted by: Beth at January 27, 2006 04:02 AM (9FPYz)
8
Doesn't sodium hypochlorite break down quickly? I mean, I'd be more worried about marring the surface of my dishes than about whether residual bleach could hurt me.
Posted by: Sean Kinsell at January 27, 2006 10:14 PM (jNW3t)
9
Mr. Kinsell has it right. The stuff is "just" .0095% bleach and it breaks down to common table salt...
I've tried making dilute solutions of bleach to have around the house (CDC even recommends it!!!)and you know what? Either I end up bleaching my clothes or it doesn't kill anything. Who wants to measure anyway? Plus, the stuff just doesn't last so you always have to make it fresh. I think these guys figured out how to make the stuff keep in a bottle. Drink up!
Posted by: jk445 at February 09, 2006 07:38 PM (sYzaW)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
HELP!
Ok, so somehow I have f*cked up firefox, and now instead of it opening popup type windows normal sized (like comment windows), they all open up narrow and unresizable.
I figured out how to make it allow me to manually resize the too-small windows, thanks to Mozilla, but I have no idea how to make it work right in the first place. I would prefer not to have to resize the stoopid things every time they open.
This only happens in MY Firefox profile, not my husband's or the dummy one I set up in the process of troubleshooting.
Any ideas? I know many of you are much bigger computer geeks than I am....
Posted by: caltechgirl at
08:39 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 116 words, total size 1 kb.
1
try trashing your profile, and then creating a new one? Unless you have lots of saved passwords, cookies and other items that will be difficult to reproduce (and you probably don't), you should be ok.
Posted by: Bill at January 25, 2006 08:56 PM (ujJj1)
2
nope. Too much to migrate. It would take hours. I had to duplicate it for work once and it took all day.
Posted by: caltechgirl at January 25, 2006 09:01 PM (uI/79)
3
I have the same problem sometimes, but then other times they pop up normally. (I have nothing helpful to say about this.)
Posted by: Cardinal Martini at January 25, 2006 11:37 PM (dAOZx)
4
I think the trick is to resize, have no windows open in the smaller size, exit Firefox, and then that size will save as the default. However, it will get overridden otherwise.
Posted by: Jay at January 26, 2006 04:14 AM (a6pw5)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
77kb generated in CPU 0.0312, elapsed 0.0411 seconds.
36 queries taking 0.0281 seconds, 126 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.