April 13, 2005
Idol update
**spoilers for you west coast types**
Yay!!!! Nadia is gone!!!! Woo Hoo!!!
Can't believe Bo got the second-least votes. Scott must have a guardian angel. I have to say, though, that Scott sang SOOOO much better tonight than he has yet on the show. Much much better than the first time he sang it.
Bo better step it up next week. I'm betting Carrie was 4th from the bottom.
Posted by: caltechgirl at
10:49 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 73 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Caltechgirl!!??
You didn't like Nadia?! I was SO ready for Scott to go. And why the heck was Bo in the bottom 3!?? I just posted a rant on this this a.m. :-) You don't like Carrie? Well, I'm a country music fan, so I have a soft-spot for her. I thought she kicked butt with the Pat Benatar song though. Who's your pick to win?
Posted by: Marie at April 14, 2005 09:57 AM (cRiTs)
2
I never watch the results show. I can't believe they voted Nadia off!!! She was my favourite female after Carrie. Scott is just so awful, and I've had an intense dislike of him since the first Hollywood show. BLEAH!!!
Posted by: Ith at April 14, 2005 05:29 PM (JdMk4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Dessert time!
For this week's Carnival of the Recipes, here's a favorite in my family. The Caltechmom is diabetic, so sugar-free is frequently on the menu. This recipe is a twist on the traditional apple pie.
Caltechmom's Nearly Sugar Free Apple Pie
1 large pkg. Cook 'n' Serve (NOT instant) Vanilla Pudding mix
1 1/2 cup unsweetened apple juice
1 1/2 tsp Cinnamon
1- 1 1/2 packet Sweet N Low (Splenda is probably ok, but DO NOT use Equal)
3-4 cups apples, peeled and sectioned
1 6oz fat-reduced graham cracker crust
1 tub fat-free Cool whip
Directions:
Pre-heat oven to 375 deg. F.
In a medium saucepan over medium heat, combine pudding mix, juice, cinnamon, and sweetner. Stir well.
Add apples, stir constantly until boiling.
Pour in crust, shake gently to settle.
Bake for 20 minutes, let cool.
Top with Cool Whip and serve.
Enjoy.
This week's CotR is hosted by Drew of Conservative Friends (at least I think it is...)
In any case get those recipes in to recipe(dot)carnival(at)gmail(dot)com before 12am EDT Friday (Thursday night!)
Posted by: caltechgirl at
08:58 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 178 words, total size 1 kb.
I always knew it
But now it's been
proven.
John Kerry is in fact the World's Biggest Douchebag!
"The Web is abuzz today with discussion of John Kerry's crass call for military hardship stories he can use for his political advantage.
I share Instapundit's, Anklebitingpundits', Polipundit's, Vodkapundits', Ace's, and others' contempt for Kerry's cynical manipulation of personal hardships.
Kerry has sunk so low with this latest ploy that my first thought this morning was "What an unbelievable douchebag!" This spurred me to some serious scientific research. I had to find out: is John Kerry the biggest douchebag in the world?
Google finds 13,000,000 hits for a search on John Kerry. This gives us our baseline Kerry identification level. Then, by searching John Kerry douchebag, we find how many mentions associate John Kerry with a douchebag. The result is 17,500. By dividing this number by the 13 million baseline Kerry identification level and multiplying by 1000, we arrive at the Douchebag Identification Per Thousand(TM) quotient (DBIPT). Kerry's DBIPT score is 1.35, a truly phenomenal rating."
Read the rest to find out how other people scored!
(h/t: Ken)
Posted by: caltechgirl at
08:15 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 190 words, total size 2 kb.
today's stupid quiz
Today's stupid quiz:

Which Website are You?
Posted by: caltechgirl at
05:36 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 13 words, total size 1 kb.
1
It said I'm fracking E-Bay!!
Stupid quiz....
OT: Congrats on becomging a Munuvian!! Had I known you were looking to escape BlogSpot, I'd have nominated you.
Posted by: Mad Mikey at April 13, 2005 07:53 PM (xGZ+b)
2
Yahoo - You adapt slowly, but many still rely on you. You like to organize things. You are very popular. You like to yodel.
Posted by: vw bug at April 13, 2005 08:50 PM (rhlNH)
3
"You are cnn.com - You like to tell people what's going on in the world. People accuse you of being biased. You have a deep voice."
Posted by: Amanda at April 14, 2005 02:51 AM (qLjc5)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Idol chatter
Ok, I admit it. I watch it. Once they get to Hollywood, and I don't have to sit through painfully embarrassing auditions I watch it.
In fact, since it's on before House, my friend and I watch it together. We're both singers. In fact, she's so much of a better singer than I am that I hate to put myself in the same group as her, but in any case.... let's say we've both taken enough music lessons and singing lessons to know the difference between crap and not crap.
From that perspective, Randy Jackson is frequently closest to our criticisms. Occasionally Simon (when he's not being too harsh) is too, but Paula is on happy pills.
In any case, I just wanted to get this much off my chest: Quit gushing about Carrie. She's awful. Yeah, she's cute, but I've never heard anyone turn so many good songs into country music. Hell, even Garth Brooks managed to do rock and blues as rock and blues. Simon was right, that was her worst performance.
here's my thoughts on the others:
Scott: needs to go. At least you could hear him last night.
Nadia: get a life. She reminds me of a female impersonator on a cruise ship.
Anthony: Lovely voice, but he's Clay Jr. Last night's performance had some energy, though, and I liked it.
Vonzell: a beautiful instrument (voice) but her performances hold her back. Anyone who can make a Whitney Houston song her own has something there. Last night was a turning point for her, though since her performance was good as well as her voice.
Anwar: Creepy. Just creepy. His voice is weak and he needs to cover that nasty hairless chest.
Bo: what can I say? i love him. he's sexy and evidently the same age as my husband! He's got a great voice and he looks like the reincarnation of Lynyrd Skynyrd or the Allman brothers. I have been waiting to hear "Freebird" since he started the competition. I was a little disappointed with it, though, because the accompaniment was an orchestra and a little regimented. Where was the frickin' guitar solo, dammit? And WTF with Simon telling him to do a "well known rocking song" What the hell IS a well known rocking song if it isn't Freebird? I mean it's only the national anthem of the south. Yes, I do know all the lyrics. No, I didn't know them before I moved here.
Constantine (aka Creed Boy): Wait, he's my age? Damn. He's got an amazing voice. I think some of his performances were so-so. I have to give him credit for tackling Bohemian Rhapsody, though, which is hard as hell to sing and probably the most stylized song to hit pop music other than Frampton's "do you feel like i do" (guitar synth voice), and for doing it well.
I'm guessing the bottom 3 will be Scott, Carrie, and Nadia. Bottom 2: Scott and Nadia. Loser: Scott.
But then again, I picked Scott and Nadia last week and Nikko went home....
Thoughts?
Posted by: caltechgirl at
01:20 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 514 words, total size 3 kb.
1
Bo has to be the favorite at this point.
But, gosh, they are all (including Carrie) pretty good.
I have been impressed with the performances.
Posted by: Flap at April 13, 2005 04:19 PM (xHzi+)
2
I only watch the show during the embarassing auditions segment. That's the best part.
Posted by: Xrlq at April 13, 2005 05:14 PM (585Ar)
3
Scott should go. I love Constatine's voice...but I'm tired of him molesting the camera. Bo is another fav for me. It shall be interesting!
Posted by: Sissy at April 13, 2005 09:33 PM (PjqiK)
4
We were shocked it wasn't Scott.
Posted by: Jay at April 13, 2005 10:30 PM (hAPdw)
5
OK, I'm playing catchup here...
I'm laughing at what Sissy said!
Anwar!!?? I think he's a doll! & I really like his voice. He doesn't stand out as a star though, but I like him.
Carrie was over-hyped early on, I agree. But I do think she has a great voice. And the most perfect teeth! The country music station here is all over Carrie. They're saying she'll get a deal no matter what.
It seems to be universal... Scott has to go. So why the heck is he still around? See my post for the conclusion I've drawn on that...
Posted by: Marie at April 14, 2005 10:13 AM (cRiTs)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Wednesday House Blogging
Last night's episode was interesting. Can't comment on the medical stuff except to say that Epstein-Barr is a foul virus that is usually only responsible for Mononucleosis, but in some cases can become chronic, and in other cases, amy lie dormant for years (much like chicken pox/shingles) and come on in response to stress.
However, I would like to address one point: House's speech to the conference.
In these days of CME (Continuing Medical Education) and full financial disclosure, it would have been hard for House to even be accepted to make that speech at a regular meeting. CME rules state that all lecturers/presenters at a professional meeting (including yours truly) must disclose any financial or other interest in the company(ies) who make the products that they are discussing, or who funds their grants. Because House's hospital is owned by Vogler's company, House would have to state that he is fully employed by the company through the hospital. Furthermore, his talk would be considered a sales pitch, and therefore not eligible for CME credit. so in all likelihood such a talk would have been held at a satellite event sponsored by the company, rather than the main meeting.
In that case, it's a surprise Vogler didn't try to fire him right then and there. He ruined a sales presentation.
But he did the right thing. Every time Vogler tries to hold his employment over his head, I have to laugh. In the real world, a hospital could lose its accreditation for allowing a pharmaceutical comapny to turn it into its own private colony of lab rats. What he's asked House to do, over and over is so unethical it's laughable. You can't fire a resident without cause. You can't pimp a product at a conference. You can't ask a doctor to give or withhold treatment from someone simply because it doesn't mesh with your corporate agenda (although HMOs try to do that every day).
And I suspect Cameron will be back.... the actress is listed as appearing in upcoming episodes and I think we all know now that Vogler is on his way out.
Posted by: caltechgirl at
12:53 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 360 words, total size 2 kb.
random ventation
ok here goes:
1. WTF with the bus drivers these days? Arrgh. It drives me nuts. Ok, really I have no room to complain, Chapel Hill transit is free. Yes, free. The town and the university each chip in and they got a federal grant to cover some of the expenses, so there's no fare.
That doesn't excuse the bus drivers who seem to have made it their personal mission to run stop signs, drive through EVERY pothole, turn too fast, and generally be as rude as they can and induce the maximum amount of nausea.
There's one bus driver who refuses to pick people up on one side of the street if he's coming back to stop on the other side of the street later, unless they're getting off somewhere before where he turns around. Doesn't matter that it's perfectly legal to ride the bus for any length of time shorter than one full circuit of the route, he won't pick you up. He won't pick you up if you're more than 5 feet from the bus stop either. Some folks stand away from the signs in bad weather because of the trees, and I've seen him go roaring past people, even with the passengers inside telling him to stop. This guy is also the king of whiplash and nausea.
There used to be this incredibly nice bus driver who talked to everyone and sang and was generally fun. Until somebody took umbrage at his pleasant attitude, and he got told to lay off....
2. People you work with who go off on an ego trip all over you. Especially your juniors.
'nuff said.
3. People who like to complain about the weather. I like the rain very much, thank you. I just wish I could stay home and curl up with a good book and enjoy it, rather than come to work.
4. Waiting to hear back from people when you have a deadline.
There may be more additions as the day goes on.
Posted by: caltechgirl at
11:50 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 340 words, total size 2 kb.
April 12, 2005
This ABSOLUTELY made my day
Thanks
Michele.
The Top 25 Sesame Street moments (according to Mike)
My personal favorite: #12. Of course.
Go here to see an updated version of the 12 song. You may have to save it to your hard drive, but it's worth it! (includes the classic pinball animation)
Posted by: caltechgirl at
09:14 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 57 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Congrats on the new site!
And Put Down the Duckie is my fav--no questions asked!
Posted by: Tony Iovino at April 12, 2005 01:07 PM (PSRRr)
2
That made my day too.
Talk about a flashback!
Posted by: AmandaDufau at April 12, 2005 01:16 PM (ay+rD)
3
Cool link, thanks for that. For me, it was a toss up between the aliens (for some reason the yip yip yip just cracks me up), and the this is near and this is far one.
Posted by: Amanda at April 13, 2005 02:50 AM (qLjc5)
4
Wish I could say it was a flashback, but I'm living some of those every day with my kids. Cool site... thanks for sharing.
Posted by: vw bug at April 13, 2005 05:34 PM (rhlNH)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
April 11, 2005
Boromir and the Ninja Wizards Part Deux
Heh. Boromir tries
again.
For those of you who missed the original Boromir and the Ninja Wizards, you can find it here.
Be warned, part II has more adventuresome (and adult) language.....
Enjoy!
(h/t Jen)
Posted by: caltechgirl at
05:04 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 49 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Pretty funny, I think I preferred the first one though. Maybe I am not adventuresome enough!
Posted by: amanda at April 11, 2005 06:47 PM (cqrWD)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
I love it when a plan comes together
except that I didn't plan this.
I made it home in time to see the Sox-Yanks game. Well, from the bottom of the 2nd, anyway. Home opener at Fenway, and World Series ring day. The Sox have always been my AL team, although I really don't know why. Maybe it was the fact that they are perennial losers (except for last year). Probably though, it's because as a Dodger fan, my hatred of the Yankees is nearly genetic. You can't bleed Dodger blue and like the Yanks. So I guess it's no surprise that I like the Sox.
The rings are just gorgeous. The Red Sox B in rubies over a field of diamonds and blue sapphires on the face. One side is inscribed with each player's name and number, the other bears the motto "The Greatest Comeback in History". Inside each ring is inscribed "86 years 10/27/04"
Here's Manny Ramirez's:

AP Photo for ESPN
Anyway, top of the third right now, 2-0 Sox with 1 out, 1 on...
(h/t Michele (sorry) for the Boston Herald article)
Update: 7-1 Sox at the end of the 4th. 8-1 Sox Win!
Posted by: caltechgirl at
04:07 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 205 words, total size 1 kb.
Thanks and welcome!
Well, sitemeter seems to be working about as well as it ever did, and it looks like most of you have found your way over here to my new home. Thanks for making the trip. I apologize for the dearth of content. I haven't had that much time to write anything that doesn't contribute to graduation lately, but I promise to try to rectify that in the near future
Just wanted to say thanks to those of you who thought it was important enough to announce the big move. so thanks to:
Ith
Ben
Angela
Jay and Deb
Not Dale Gribble
Dean
Blogchild Paul
Amanda
Flap
Y'all made me feel pretty special!! If I forgot anyone's announcement, let me know and I'll put up a happy link to you too.
Update: thanks also to a Queen and a Paladin!
Posted by: caltechgirl at
12:44 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 146 words, total size 2 kb.
1
I have linked to you as well.
Site looks good and best of luck!
My link:http://flapsblog.blogspot.com/2005/04/not-exactly-rocket-science-blog-has.html
Posted by: Flap at April 11, 2005 03:24 PM (PmaN7)
2
Now if I can just manage to get the blogroll changed... :-)
Thanks.
Posted by: Deb at April 11, 2005 05:57 PM (hAPdw)
Posted by: Christina at April 12, 2005 08:31 AM (zJsUT)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
April 09, 2005
South Park Republicans
Beth of
My VRWC has begun a gallery of the real South Park Republicans.
Here's me:

To make your own South Park character go here.
To see the gallery, go here
Posted by: caltechgirl at
06:13 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 37 words, total size 1 kb.
1
You don't look very happy for someone in Heaven. And if you're in Heaven, shouldn't you have a PSP instead of a lightsaber???
Posted by: Ben at April 09, 2005 08:03 PM (0ypJF)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Waah
I'm a marauding marsupial again. I put in the request to get the blog stats switched over, but it's evidently not changed yet.
Sitemeter seems to be working, though.
Does anyone know whethetr the TTLB change request code goes in the od blog or new blog? I did just have it in the old blog, but now it's in both. The instructions weren't clear....
Posted by: caltechgirl at
04:38 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 66 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I have no idea... but I suspect unless you get a LOT of links, it doesn't matter.
My traffic has doubled in the past few months, but I've gone from a marsupial down to an adorable rodent.
Be glad you haven't fallen so far.
:-P
Posted by: Jack at April 09, 2005 08:49 PM (7GUn3)
2
I had the same question, and same result... please let me know if you figure it out!
Posted by: Donna at April 09, 2005 10:30 PM (0yEW+)
3
I'd list the old site as an alternate URL for the new one. That way, links to either site will count toward your ranking.
Posted by: Xrlq at April 09, 2005 10:32 PM (6QUSd)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Before I forget
Between endless reruns of the Pope's funeral and the (
choke, cough) marriage of Charles and Camilla, CNN et al have been trumpeting an anti-US demonstration that took place in Iraq earlier today.
Several thousand protestors, under the orders of Muqtada-Al-Sadr gathered in the square in Baghdad that witnessed the demolishing of that statue of saddam hussein two years ago today.
According to CNN's TV coverage this is a bad thing. Really? I think it's great. Here's why:
more...
Posted by: caltechgirl at
01:30 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 156 words, total size 1 kb.
April 08, 2005
It's Friday
And I need to let people know I've moved over here, so here are 10 yummy links:
1. I love Rachel Lucas. This is exactly why I have a dog.
2. Dean's World turns 3 today. Pretty good longevity for the b'sphere. I wonder where I'll be at 2.5 years from now....
3. Blogbuddies the California Mafia are wondering who drops by their site. If you've been there before, drop by and leave a note telling them where you're at.
4. Speaking of blogbuddies, Da Goddess had a steroid injection to her spine (ouch, epidural steroids!) yesterday, and is slowly improving from the side effects of the treatment. Drop by and offer her some good wishes! While you're visiting in San Diego, go here and leave your best for Mrs. SMASH, who is recuperating from a serious back injury after being thrown from a horse earlier this week.
5. Cobb cartoons the MJ trial. I'll never see the glove the same way again.
6. Acidman has the winners of the annual Bulwer-Lytton "dark and stormy night" contest.
7. Gir is cat-blogging again.
8. Jay at Wizbang! has a new hood ornament...
9. Friday Wolf-blogging from the Laughing Wolf
10. Daisychick Angela has quite a shopping trip ahead of her.....
Posted by: caltechgirl at
05:33 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 213 words, total size 2 kb.
I thought you'd never ask...
The little silver guy on the
rightleft is GIR, he's the stupid but loveable robot sidekick of Invader Zim.
Who, for those of you who have never been blessed enough to see the show, is an incompetent Irken Invader sent to conquer Earth just to get him out from underfoot after he destroyed the Irken homeworld....
This is Zim:

Zim was on Nickelodeon for about a year and is still on Nicktoons every once in a while from what I'm told (too poor for those extra channels, you know?) but it is SOOO not a kids show. It's like Animaniacs, only more twisted. Kids like it, but adults like it even more.
The Nickelodeon Zim site is here, and one of my favorite fan sites is here.
For more Zimmy goodness, drop in on fellow MuNuvian Gir at YourMooseyFate.
The phrase "The Bacon in My Soap" is from one of the episodes, and the audio of the bit is now linked there. Scroll down and click. Zim is the angry one, GIR is the silly one.
The girl with the "gameslave" down below (with the archives) is also from Zim. She's Gaz, the younger sister of Zim's nemesis Dib, and my personal favorite character on the show. I was Gaz for halloween year before last, and my friends were Gir, Zim, and Dib. Very cool.
Posted by: caltechgirl at
04:30 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 235 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Yes! The series was great; probably my favorite episode involved Zim deciding he needed to get human organs inside his body before visiting the school nurse, and if one spleen was good, 4 must be better.
Posted by: owlish at April 09, 2005 12:32 AM (sBj9U)
2
In my browser, the little silver guy is on the left.
Is this one of those IE versus Mozilla things, or is it because I'm in France?
:-P
Posted by: Jack at April 09, 2005 09:10 AM (7GUn3)
3
My favorite episode, hands down is Pustulio. Second place: Gir Goes Crazy and Stuff. But they're all good.
Posted by: caltechgirl at April 09, 2005 01:17 PM (iCaDI)
4
Well, he didn't "destroy" the Irken homeworld. He set a lot of fires, blew up supplies, infrastructure, etc. Which pretty much destroyed Irken plans for galactic conquest. What was the name of the operation? "Impending Doom" or something like that? Well, Zim's the reason why the operation name in the 1st episode is "Impending Doom II".

("I put the fires out." "You made them -worse-!" "Worse, or -better-?")
My current favorite is Game Slave. Gaz is scaaaaaaary.
("AAAAA-hey, how did you write that when you're out there?!")
Posted by: Patrick Chester at April 12, 2005 01:52 AM (dzwUR)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
great cosmic convergence...
Today started out pretty ok. I got on the bus, I went to work, I finished another chapter of my thesis (Yay!). I even remembered to drop by the student health pharmacy and pick up my prescription. Then it all just went downhill. I had scheduled some time to do some imaging using my co-mentor's
confocal microscope (holy crap even it has a wiki! Check it out, the idea is really cool!), but there were 2 problems.
1. It's sort of not working (it works, but it's buggy right now)
2. He wanted to see my sections and he was at a symposium.
more...
Posted by: caltechgirl at
03:26 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 359 words, total size 2 kb.
1
I evaluated confocal microscopes back in the mid '90s. They *are* cool...
Posted by: Jack at April 09, 2005 09:08 AM (7GUn3)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
April 07, 2005
Let's get cookin'
It's spring. The dogwoods and wisteria are all in bloom, and that nasty pine pollen has coated the town of Chapel Hill in a post-victory yellow dust. Blecch. I need to wash my car.....
Anyway, one of the things I love in the spring is a good pasta primavera with all of the veggies and herbs that are just starting to come in fresh. Here's a wonderful recipe from the Better Homes and Gardens cookbook. It's great because you use packaged pasta and refrigerated alfredo sauce (makes it super quick!)
Rotini and Sweet Pepper Primavera
14 oz Asparagus spears
8 oz dried rotini or gemelli (I prefer gemelli)
1 large sweet red or yellow bell pepper, cut into 1 inch pieces
1 cup halved baby pattypan, or chopped summer, yellowneck, or zucchini squash (I like to use a mix of them)
1 10 oz container refrigerated light/low fat (or regular if you like) Alfredo sauce
2 Tbsp snipped fresh tarragon or thyme
1/4 tsp crushed red pepper
1. Snap off and discard woody bases from asparagus spears. Bias-slice (diagonally) asparagus into 1-inch pieces.
2. Cook pasta according to package directions, adding asparagus, sweet bell pepper and squash too pasta for the last 3 minutes of cooking. Drain, return pasta and vegetable mixture to hot pan.
3. Meanwhile, for sauce, in a small saucepan combine alfredo sauce, tarragon or thyme and red pepper. Cook and stir over medium heat about 5 minutes or until heated through. Pour sauce over pasta and vegetables; stir gently to coat. If desired, garnish with fresh herbs and/or grated parmesan cheese.
prep time:20 minutes start to finish, serves 4.
Posted by: caltechgirl at
05:39 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 279 words, total size 2 kb.
This is why I will never be more than a Large Mammal
If you haven't been there yet, you really should drop by
Captain's Quarters and bear witness to Ed Morrisey's
own version of the South Park movie, starring in the real life role of Kyle's mom (but he's no b*tch!).
Update: looks like Kyle's Mom
wins in this one!
Ed is single-handedly taking on the nation of Canada and their idiotic law which allows them to keep the proceedings of public hearings out of the media. How ironic it is that Canadians can't report the goings on, but an American can.
more...
Posted by: caltechgirl at
01:27 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 353 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Normally, I'd be keeping my little Canuck fingers offa the keyboard on this, but I'd just like to point out a couple of things:
1) When the ban was imposed, Gomery made it clear that
it was a temporary measure. All the testmony given still remains part of the public record. No rights have been taken away.
2) You
are correct that the hearings are not
in camera; the Commission in fact has a small conference room (about 200 seats) available where interested citizens can go to view the testimony - including the testimony covered by the publication ban (this, of course, is only really useful if one lives in Montréal; and according to our MSM, the room has been at near-capacity since the start of the inquiry. Québecer's are quite passionate about their politics - and their scandals). Nothing in the ban prevents the viewers from relaying any information learned to others
by private means (including e-mail; I have a friend in Montréal who e-mailed me some of the choice bits from the first couple of days of Brault's testimony. I'd discussed them privately with a couple of my friends here on the West Coast, but I did
not publish that info on
my blog. I may not exactly agree with the ban, but I am
not stupid.), but we Canadians also know that any testimony given under the ban will be released to the media with a reasonable degree of dispatch (as has been the case with this), and our "right to know" has never been taken away from us (unless, of course, by "right to know" you mean "right to know, RIGHT NOW!!!").
I agree that the publication ban is a bit stupid in this modern age of the internet, but I truly wonder if your outrage is, shall we say, for real.
If such publication bans abridge the people's (in your words) "right to know what their government is doing and what the truth is in this matter", I'd really like to know your own opinion of your government's ban on the photos of the coffins returning from Iraq (which is still in force). The dead (honoured or otherwise) are a sad fact of war, so why should that fact be kept from the American public?
Or are such bans only considered good when they are covering the ass of the faction you support?
While I agree with the fundamental stupidity of the ban (in this case, at least), I know how our system of public inquiry works, and I know that it
does work (quite well, thank you, and it's done so since 1867). I also know it's an historic given that any Federal scandal involving Québec is going to a) be nasty; b) probably involve some sort of criminal wrong-doing; and, c) reflect badly on both sides in the mess (and this goes all the way back to the Pacific Scandal of 1873 - for which a Conservative government was responsible, I might add).
We Canadians have our system, and we are quite comfortable with it, thank you very much (despite what people in your country might think about it).
Ta.
Posted by: Doug McKay at April 08, 2005 08:05 PM (Cp5LT)
2
The dead deserve respect in death. I don't mind when our national news shows their pictures every night as they were in life. The current policy has been in place since WWII and was implemented not to cover the government's ass, since most people supported that war, but to spare the feelings of the families who had lost their loved ones.
All of the network news programs show the service photos and on occasion, family photos, of the recently dead. I'm not real thrilled with all of the media coverage of JPII's dead body on display either.
Does all the "banned" information really come out? Or does it get sanitized by holding it? Why is the Canadian government afraid of letting people know what's going on in a timely manner? It seems designed to cover the ruling party at the expense of the citizens. I don't doubt that the system works, per se, probably better than ours in some cases, but this kind of policy is ridiculous in a free society.
Posted by: caltechgirl at April 08, 2005 09:06 PM (iCaDI)
3
Hi there, Ctg! Sorry I'm late getting back to you on this (see last para).
Fair comment on the coffin issue. Well put (and I'll consider myself justly - and politely - slapped for the CYA comment). I wasn't aware the policy dated from WWII; I've only been aware of in in the context of Vietnam and television coverage.
As for the "banned" information coming out: I believe it does. Because it's a public inquiry, it's a pretty fair bet that both sides will have people in the audience taking notes, for eventual comparison with what comes out in the published reports. I can say this with a high degree of certainty, as I ended up doing that - even though I'm not the greatest at shorthand - during the Vancouver hearings of the Krever inquiry (that was our Red Cross/Health Canada tainted blood scandal). Given that the published testimony from these kinds of hearings can run into the thousands of pages, I will grant that some things can be missed (and probably are - there's only so much legalese and bureaucratese you can wade through before the circuit breakers in your brain start demanding anaesthesia). I can't really give you an exact percentage for all inquiries, but from my experience with the Krever commission, there was (I'd say) about a 95% accuracy/disclosure rate on that one (and that was a scandal that encompassed 4 governments - 2 Liberal, 2 Conservative). It is really tough to judge just how accurate these sorts of commissions are (think of how many questions the Warren commission left in it's wake).
As for your sanitising question; I suppose it can be regarded as an expanded version of the common governmental practice of releasing controversial press notices late on Friday afternoons, hoping that some of the controversy will slip through the cracks (but I'm not sure that's the right context to put it in, so that's the best thought I have on the subject). Besides, a scandal of this magnitude tends to make a mere rat's nest look like the winner of the Good Housekeeping Seal of Approval, so trying to "sanitise" any information is pretty much a dead issue right off the bat.
Now we get to your
really tough question (
Why is the Canadian government afraid of letting people know what's going on in a timely manner?), and I'll answer as best as I can.
The core of the whole mess is the Québec sovereignty/separation issue, which has been running at a good simmer (with occasional outbreaks of high-rolling boil) for forty-plus years (the best, if inexact, analogy for you would be your Civil War. We're just fighting our version via Parliament, the courts, and public-relations firms rather than grabbing the weapons and having at it - although I've always been afraid it could come down to "seeing the whites of their eyes'). We still haven't solved it. I don't think we will ever
really solve it. I sometimes think the only reason Canada has remained whole is because of the sheer ineptitude that the players on both sides of the issue have displayed over the years.
Right now the government fear about AdScam is driven more by the realities of being a minority government, and I'll try and summarise as best I can.
Our parliament has 308 seats (we can ignore our Senate for now...but then again, most of we Canadians tend to ignore our Senate anyways, as the Senate tends to be mostly harmless). As a result of the June '04 election the Liberals (135 seats) and NDP (19 seats) - these two parties are reasonably natural, if uneasy, allies - hold half the seats in the House. The Conservatives (99 seats), the Bloc Québecois (54 seats) and one independent make up the other half.
Small (but pertinent) digression: Our Liberals are analagous to your Democrats (mostly); our Conservatives are analagous to your Republicans; the NDP is social-ist (originally rising out the philosophy of the Methodist Social Gospel, rather than Debsian-type social-ism) with Naderist leanings (60's Nader rather than the Nader of last year); the Bloc is mixed-bag (left, right, whatever), but their main mantra is "Québec first". The independent is a wild card. He was the incumbent candidate (for the Conservatives) in his riding (re-nominated unopposed), but the party brass disallowed his candidacy and replaced him with someone more "acceptable". He ran as an independent and still won the seat.
Back to the mess. This is all complicated by the fact that the Speaker (who cannot normally vote, except to maintain the status quo in the event of a tie vote on the floor of the House) is a sitting Liberal. This leaves the Liberals with 134 voting members. The government is on an incredibly thin footing. If the government falls (by a vote of non-conference), our Governor-General
could ask the Conservatives to form a minority government with the Bloc. That alliance is about as likely as a mongoose making friends with a cobra, as the Conservatives have a very large anti-Québec streak running through the party, so the likely outcome of a Liberal defeat.
Historically, the party who makes a successful non-confidence motion so soon (ie. within two years) after the previous election has been slaughtered in the election they triggered. The Conservatives could trigger the vote mostly because they hate the Liberals (but they might bank on gaining enough votes from disaffected Liberals - in Ontario, mostly - to make the exercise worth it). The NDP could trigger the vote on principle. Up to the partial lift of the publication ban, the Bloc could have triggered a non-confidence vote without doing themselves any damage. Now that they are implicated in AdScam they may have second thoughts about bringing down the govenment.
I have no idea how this is going to play out (the minority government situation is the one time I start thinking that your two party system is better, but I console myself with the fact that our minority parliaments are nowhere near as bad as Italy's or France's), but I do know it's going to get a lot uglier before it gets better.
Sorry for this being so long (I tried avoiding writing a poli-sci textbook), but I hope this all makes sense and answers your questions (I've been fighting a nasty sinus infection, and the antibiotics - and pain - don't necessarily contribute to coherence).
Posted by: Doug McKay at April 11, 2005 03:09 PM (Cp5LT)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
76kb generated in CPU 0.0263, elapsed 0.0824 seconds.
84 queries taking 0.0653 seconds, 251 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.