September 24, 2006
My New Theme Song
Courtesy of Weird Al:
Oh, and just to prove what a freaking nerd I am, the equation displayed behind Al and Donny Osmond is the
most common form of the time-independent version of Schroedinger's wave equation for non-relativistic systems
Posted by: caltechgirl at
03:55 PM
| Comments (10)
| Add Comment
Post contains 47 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Sissy at September 24, 2006 04:20 PM (e+8WB)
2
Dude, was that Donny Osmond in the background?
Posted by: Contagion at September 24, 2006 05:05 PM (0m/ho)
Posted by: Amy at September 24, 2006 05:27 PM (DWNNI)
4
YES! That IS Donny Osmond!
Posted by: caltechgirl at September 24, 2006 06:00 PM (r0kgl)
5
I identified with WAAAAY too many of the parts of that song...
Posted by: G at September 24, 2006 06:09 PM (/b6MF)
6
holy crap! that was great.
**hangs head in shame at how much that video mirrors reality**
Posted by: wRitErsbLock at September 24, 2006 07:06 PM (0Pi1o)
7
I heard him interviewed on the Glenn Beck show on Friday. He's fantastic.
Posted by: jen at September 25, 2006 09:28 AM (XBUdh)
8
Holy Crap. That is all.
Posted by: Sharon at September 25, 2006 03:09 PM (pgnbp)
9
"People keep telling me I'm making a comeback. Uh, I never realized I was gone."
--Weird Al
Posted by: Dave J at September 25, 2006 06:40 PM (SKqxt)
10
*LOL* geez, it's scarey to realize how many of the 'white and nerdy' items I can claim as my own!!
Posted by: Michele at September 26, 2006 04:00 AM (DqxwU)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
September 23, 2006
I suck
So this week was my turn for the Spyvella chapter, but I have been dealing with some major issues at work (hence the dearth of posting this week). I'll try to get it together and post it soon. Promise!
Posted by: caltechgirl at
09:32 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 43 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Honey,
You take as long as you need. There isn't a gun to your head or a bomb to defuse. (Sorry, I couldn't resist).
I do hope you are okay.
Posted by: Phoenix at September 23, 2006 09:10 PM (t385r)
2
Hope all is well. let me know if I can help!
Posted by: vw bug at September 24, 2006 01:50 PM (h89Bu)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
September 22, 2006
Seven Songs
Ok, so
I got tagged and it's Friday. Here we go:
List seven songs you are into right now. No matter what the genre, whether they have words, or even if theyÂ’re not any good, but they must be songs youÂ’re really enjoying now. Post these instructions in your blog along with your seven songs. Then tag seven other people to see what theyÂ’re listening to.
This I can do. They're not really "new" by any stretch, but they are the ones I've been listening to and thinking about...
1. "Lovers in a Dangerous Time" -- Barenaked Ladies
Don't the hours grow shorter as the days go by
You never get to stop and open our eyes
One minute you're waiting for the sky to fall
The next you're dazzled by the beauty of it all
Lovers in a dangerous time
These fragile bodies of touch and taste
This fragrant skin this hair like lace
Spirits open to the thrust of grace
Never a breath you can afford to waste
Lovers in a dangerous time
2. "The Dark of the Matinee" --Franz Ferdinand
Find me and follow me through corridors
Refectories and files you must follow
Leave this academic factory
You will find me in the matinee, the dark of the matinee
It's better in the matinee
The dark of the matinee is mine, yes it's mine
3. "The Difference" -- The Wallflowers
One, two boys by the river
Down by the water
Tellin' riddles in the dark
With fireflies under the moonlight
Carvin' the insides of a tree with a knife
Ever hear the one about the boy's big sister
His best friend come along
He tried to kiss her
The only difference
That I see
Is you are exactly the same
As you used to be..
4. "Ever the Same" -- Rob Thomas
We would stand in the wind
We were free like water
Flowing down
Under the warmth of the sun
Now it's cold and we're scared
And we've both been shaken
Look at us
Man, this doesn't need to be the end
Just let me hold you while you're falling apart
Just let me hold you so we both fall down
Fall on me tell me everything you want me to be
Forever with you
Forever in me
Ever the same
5. "Home" -- Barenaked Ladies
Where does the heart reside
If not where I lay my head?
I could run but I'm petrified
And choose this instead
Again and again
6. "Californication" -- Red Hot Chili Peppers
Destruction leads to a very rough road
But it also breeds creation
And earthquakes are to a girl's guitar
They're just another good vibration
And tidal waves couldn't save the world
From Californication
7. "This Love" -- Maroon 5
I was so high I did not recognize
The fire burning in her eyes
The chaos that controlled my mind
Whispered goodbye and she got on a plane
Never to return again
But always in my heart
Oh, and I tag the rest of the
Cotillion ladies who haven't done this one yet!
Posted by: caltechgirl at
12:39 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 517 words, total size 3 kb.
1
That's a pretty good list...
Posted by: Velociman at September 23, 2006 06:30 AM (PPmlF)
2
Love Maroon 5 & Franz Ferdinand...
I'm gonna have to steal this.
Posted by: LadyGunn at September 25, 2006 11:28 PM (YRLrR)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
September 21, 2006
Democrats say the darndest things....
Someone's been drinking the Kool Aid. In fact, a couple of someones.
Let's start with Charlie Rangel, who once slammed President Bush by saying"[H]e has shattered the myth of white supremacy once and for all."
And then there's Nancy "Botox Babe" Pelosi, who once called him "...a man ... who [has] consistently failed to lead our country on the most pressing issues."
Well, today Rep. Rangel blasted Hugo Chavez of Venezuela for attacking President Bush and calling him the "devil". Hot Air has the video.
This from the man who openly supports Hugo Chavez' best amigo, fidel castro (begins halfway through the clip):
Interestingly, Rangel has backpedaled, issuing a statement that what he takes issue with is merely Chavez' "personal" attack on the President. Yeah, right, Charlie. Keep digging. See quote above.
Or how about this one from Nancy herself: "[his] capacity to lead has never been there. In order to lead, you have to have judgment. In order to have judgment, you have to have knowledge and experience. He has none,'' Where was Charlie for this one?
Rep. Pelosi joined in the fun too. Calling Chavez a "thug", she blasted Chavez for "abusing the privilege" of speaking at the U.N. Ha! She's defending a man she believes is "an incompetent leader. In fact, he's not a leader, he's a person who has no judgment, no experience and no knowledge of the subjects that he has to decide upon.'"
Hypocrite much?
Posted by: caltechgirl at
02:48 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 252 words, total size 2 kb.
1
it's almost like the squabbling siblings in a big dysfunctional family...
"YOU can't insult our president! Only WE can insult our president!!!"
Posted by: ricki at September 22, 2006 05:21 AM (VRP1v)
2
Don't you just love it when they make fools of themselves? I do!
Posted by: oddybobo at September 22, 2006 06:21 AM (mZfwW)
3
I think Rangel and Pelosi were right to say what they said. It is one thing for Americans to squabble internally, and quite another for a foreign head of state to join in the fun. If some America-hating thug had come here and said the same thing about President Clinton, I hope our guys would have said the same.
Posted by: Xrlq at September 22, 2006 06:30 AM (WBDk4)
Posted by: Richmond at September 22, 2006 10:24 AM (e8QFP)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
September 19, 2006
A Gender Gap in Science?
This study came out recently, and I'm not sure how I feel about it. Ok, that's wrong. On the face,
without having read the actual text yet, I disagree with [the media's presentation of] it ENTIRELY.
You see, there's a very important factor that either they've overlooked or the media has chosen not to report....
Let me explain:
First of all, I want to make it clear that I've never experienced that kind of discrimination personally. As an undergrad, while Caltech had 4 times as many males on campus as females, the Bio department was almost 50-50. In graduate school, out of about 30 students in my program, 6 were guys. My advisor was female, too. So was her postdoctoral advisor.
Here, half of my department is female, including our chair.
But on to my main point:
One thing the study doesn't seem to consider is that women often PREFER to opt out of the higher academic jobs because of the demanding schedule. We CHOOSE to remain in a comfortable lab, where our schedule is more flexible, we can work with the people we choose to work with, and we have time to be ourselves and actually SEE our families.
This is the elephant in the living room. Academic Science has many of them.
Sure, a lot of women who are Dr. Shalala's age and even up to 20 years younger had to deal with chauvinist pigs and glass ceilings and all that. They had to CHOOSE between a career and a family. Women scientists of MY generation can have both, and are frequently choosing personal fulfillment over professional, in many cases. I did. That's why I teach, rather than pursuing a traditional academic career track.
What these older chickies can't stand is the rearrangement of priorities in younger female scientists. They hate it that we wouldn't follow them blindly through the glass ceiling, that we can stop about a foot lower and say "Thanks, I'm good." That we refuse to blaze their trail just because it's there.
I'm not naive enough to say that discrimination DOESN'T exist. However, that doesn't mean that gender-based discrimination is the ONLY reason why women don't get the highest jobs in academic science and engineering. And it's naive of THEM to say otherwise.
Posted by: caltechgirl at
11:27 AM
| Comments (16)
| Add Comment
Post contains 385 words, total size 2 kb.
Posted by: Amanda at September 19, 2006 11:35 AM (ay+rD)
2
You make some really good points and I would agree that discrimination isn't the
only reason, however in some sciences - for example, Computer Science (my field) - it definitely exists and is a huge problem. There are many studies that I've run across that indicate that the discrimination problem isn't as pronounced in sciences other than CS - and for that I'm grateful.
Why we have such a problem in CS, I'm not sure - and neither is the majority of the CS world. But it's not even all discrimination - some of it is the perception of discrimination that chases young women out of the field before they really give it a fair shake. Some of it is stereotypical profiling of the "computer geek". And some of it is the boys club attitude found in CS departments - even amongst students. I ran into to it to a degree in my undergrad and got around it primarily by either self-deprication (deflect their posturing with blondeness and it loses its appeal) or simple tom-boyishness (which wasn't a stretch for me, still isn't.) (But I was the sole female in the major all four years.) Ran into it some in my MS but got around it by saying I wanted to teach (a traditionally female role.) (Was one of probably 5 females in the Master's program). Run into it daily in my corporate job - haven't figured a way out of it yet because I don't want to be the discrimination chick.
Anyway, in some scientific fields it really is a problem - not always for the reasons they state, and we shouldn't negate or neglect the points you raise either.
Posted by: beth at September 19, 2006 02:33 PM (RrqeO)
3
I was one of very few females at the time in my field of Computer Science. Hey, I graduated in '89. What I ran into was that most of the women I worked with had 'an attitude'. Which in turn fed the 'good ol boys' and ... you get the picture. The few times I ran into some kind of harassment, I met it head on and it was solved. Like telling the VP my eyes were on my head not on my chest. But believe it or not, I had more issues with the women. I had a woman boss who did not want to give me a raise because I didn't give 120%. Like you, I enjoyed my vacations and family time (though I did not have children at the time). She couldn't understand why I didn't want to work 80 hours a week and 'show the men up'. Uhhh. Considering I was doing the same work as a man who was 2 levels senior to me, why would have I have to do any more to 'show someone up'? sigh... you got me started. I'll stop here. Enjoy your life. Don't let the ones with no self assurance get you down.
Posted by: vw bug at September 19, 2006 07:02 PM (HVeEK)
Posted by: rightwingprof at September 20, 2006 07:26 AM (hj1Wx)
5
Oh man I could say so much..., but I will summarize.... (from the Engineerign side).
School:
- University was 60/40 female, Science was majority male, which was skewed by engineering, scinces were closer togehter.
- Quite a few women left engineering because they weren't intererested. (Isn't that what women with freedom are allowed to do?)
- On a random note, while in school they would "express concern over the number of women in engineering", they never commented that 2 out of 60 students in psychology were male.
Work:
Private Sector:
- Women who strted with me advance at relatively the same rate, where all pretty much at the same point.
- Quite a few Sr. Level women I have met/worked with are single or divorced. However, many of them achivied the most while single and cut back for marrage or children.
- There is a slight bias in favor of hiring women & minorites driven by government affirmative action requirements in contracts.
Public:
- Not too much going on here, up to a certian level, the work you do relates in no way to moving up in the agency, call it the ability to "fail upwards".
- There are soem high level women in public agencies and they bust there ass and put their time in like their male counterparts.
- Once again a slight advantage to women & minorites depending on the agency.
But over all, if women choose their career, career path and how far they want to advance in their career...what the hell is the problem?
Posted by: the Pirate at September 20, 2006 08:49 AM (tM0AO)
6
Very well said.
Your comments also apply to professions other than science.
Posted by: Christina at September 20, 2006 08:53 AM (Slc5L)
7
YEP! That's why I quit grad school (biophysics) and I'm now a programmer with two kids.
It was pretty much expected you'd stay in the lab until 1 or 3 am, and (if you were on the "bad campus" in downtown Baltimore) that meant you were stuck there until morning. The last safe bus left at 11.
That's just nuts. I decided I actually wanted to see my husband and not be crazy. (That and I wanted to be paid, and get credit for what I did, and all that fun stuff.)
Oh, plus I didn't get into my top FIVE choices of lab. Not sure why. A few of them someone else just got to before I did, which is normal... but three of them wouldn't even let me do a rotation. And they weren't all full -- they let some of my fellow students do rotations. Male? Yeah. But I think it was more likely discrimination against the biologist. (My degree is in Molecular biology and all the other students were physics majors. If they had a problem with that or what I wanted to study (which I stated VERY CLEARLY when I interviewed) they shouldn't have accepted me.)
Posted by: silvermine at September 20, 2006 12:50 PM (hn7Rm)
8
Yep. There's something to be said for contentment. Not everyone wants to climb the ladder like a raging bull. Some who are that type become so bitter. As they say -- you never read on a tombstone that John Doe wished he'd spent more time at the office.
My closest college friends and I were math majors, at a school known for its rigorous math program. I recall our classes being pretty much 50/50 with females to males. And that was in the mid-80s.
Just because we haven't chosen to move mountains with our brains doesn't mean we don't have the aptitude.
It's all about making thoughtful choices.
Posted by: Marie at September 21, 2006 06:30 AM (XzzJz)
9
I just wish that some people could ACCEPT that we're "good" with where we are. I've had people (at meetings, etc.) look at me in disbelief when they find out I don't live in the lab.
eh, whatever. I don't have a spouse/kids but I'm still interested in having a life outside of research.
Which is why I'm at a small, teaching-focused college. I'm pretty happy (but do regularly complain that they need to raise admission standards). If I'm doing well, I publish an article in a minor journal every year and in a "national" journal every two or three years. And I'm not expected to bring in megabucks in grants - I'm kind of left alone to pursue what interests me, and that is what makes me happy.
I think in some sectors there's almost a reverse discrimination - that there are some women that think that if you're not taking a battering ram to some perceived glass ceiling, if you're not engaging in every pissing contest, if you're not trying to forcibly change the world, then you're wasting your time and you're actually a detriment to "the movement." Feh. There's a lot to be said for being happy. And what's to say I'm not changing the world, but that I'm doing it in a different way - through inspiring a student or maybe even doing something OUTSIDE of my work-field.
Posted by: ricki at September 21, 2006 06:35 AM (VRP1v)
10
Thank you!
It's significant that none of these studies ever look at science faculty at small, primarily teaching schools. There, faculty tends to be a lot more balanced even in the physical science. My tiny five-person chemistry/physics department has two women, and in our last two searches, at least half the applicants were women. The evidence on this is anecdotal, since no one's really crunched the numbers, but from those I know who looked for small-school academic jobs, a lot of women are opting to go that route if they want to teach and do research. The job is less focused than it would be at a research university, but is also more flexible and less stressful, plus getting to know your students is expected rather than avoided!
Posted by: Wade at September 21, 2006 08:20 AM (oK1Vc)
11
They hate it that we wouldn't follow them blindly through the glass ceiling, that we can stop about a foot lower and say "Thanks, I'm good."
Oh God, AMEN.
I do work in a scientific field-I'm an engineer, and the only female one of those in a sea of males. It's not that I don't think I can break through the glass ceiling (which, come to think of it, I don't think can be done)-it's that I don't see the point. I don't want to be a CEO-why take all that stress and pressure?
Being resilient shouldn't be read as being wimpy.
Posted by: Helen at September 21, 2006 11:32 PM (sxb5W)
12
Terrific post. You have made some excellent points here.
Posted by: Richmond at September 22, 2006 11:58 AM (e8QFP)
13
I think you make some good points, that possibly women are more likely to prioritise family and other important parts of life over personal ambition and climbing the career ladder. But, to me, the more interesting question is why this is so. It seems unlikely that it's a coincidence or entirely biologically determined, and I think it's obvious that there is pressure on women to put their own ambitions second to family life etc, when there is often no such pressure on their male counterparts.
Also it works both ways, maybe men are under undue pressure to advance their careers and they miss out on things like spending time with their young children, having a fulfilling life outside of work etc. I think that what we need is a balance between the two extremes for everyone, and a recognition that both career and family are important.
Hopefully this would lead to an improved situation for both women and men, and would even out the gender gap at work and also at home and in childcare.
Posted by: Sarah at September 23, 2006 10:24 AM (KrCMZ)
14
Thanks for you comment over at my
Weekend Pundit discussion of the same topic. Though I haven't read the book you dismiss, the excellent point you raise in your entry is valid. But why?
The 1991 book Brain Sex by Anne Moirs and David Jessel, which sponsored a revolution to my then-feminist mode of thinking, states it in one word: testosterone.
It's why there are so few female UPS drivers, for instance. Women don't have the drive, no pun intended, to do package delivery for 10 hours a day, a brutal though excellent way for a low-skill guy to make a living. It does have its drawbacks: after air traffic controllers, UPS drivers have the highest rate of divorce of any occupation.
A nice way of looking at it is that brains, which are wired in utero, reconfirm a rather traditional view of the sexes. Your need to have more of a flex schedule, even though you're just as good or better than your male peers, means that advancement will be denied you more often during the course of a career.
At times, though, this is circumvented by affirmative action. But I for one oppose treating people in any other way than as individuals when it comes to the law and the marketplace.
BTW, have you seen the Wikipedia entry on Donna Shalala? It's funny when it goes she's never been married "wink, wink."
Posted by: Brent at September 24, 2006 07:01 AM (i+uCz)
15
For her contribution to utterly unsupported and damaging literature about women and society I have awarded Brizendine the first annual "More Likely to Be Killed By a Terrorist Than Marry Retraction" award, named for the 1986 Newsweek story, retracted this year. See my blog, http://gettoworkmanifesto.com/blog/, for the details. Put another way, A Million Little Made Up Footnotes.
Posted by: Linda Hirshman at September 26, 2006 02:41 PM (2pxF1)
16
Should not be necessary, but I'll mention that this post was a response to the prior comment that it's hard wired in utero, just another example of the poison spread in the social discourse by the Terrorist Retraction Award winning "Female Brain."
Posted by: Linda Hirshman at September 26, 2006 02:44 PM (2pxF1)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
I guess I'm growing up...
As some of you may know, I felt like shit last night. On top of
whacking my head sunday night, the sinuses on the other side decided it
was time to play catch-up, including a sore throat. Well, nothing
worked, and even the damn chloraseptic wore off too soon, so I asked hubby
to go out and get us milkshakes to fix my throat. He got back about 10, just
in time to put on the news, right?
I get about halfway through my milkshake, look up, and there's
John Fucking FlipFlopper KetchupBoy spewing about how his religion
makes him who he is and how that should be important to everyone at
some speech he gave at Pepperdine (he was really in town to raise $$
for Angelides....)
I
DID NOT throw my milkshake at the TV. It was hard. I
DID
manage to grab the remote and change the channel, though. But my hands
were shaking and I had to actually tell myself to put down the cup and
get the remote.
Hubby said he was proud of me. Probably because he would have had to clean it up.....
Posted by: caltechgirl at
10:22 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 200 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I'm glad you didn't waste a perfectly good milk shake on that schmuck. It would have been a shame.
Posted by: wRitErsbLock at September 19, 2006 11:34 AM (0uaKa)
2
you should have changed to the dodger game...
Posted by: KG at September 19, 2006 02:06 PM (AC0TE)
3
Oh I found his trip even better, given his BS in West Hollywood where reported as: "Kerry referred repeatedly to state programs that had been cut and to
politics that caters to special interests"WHICH given that I know exactly whre he was, who he was talking to and what he was doing before that speech, it just shows him to be full of nothing but shite.
Posted by: the Pirate at September 20, 2006 08:59 AM (tM0AO)
4
Ohhh...milkshake. Nummy, yummy.
KetchupBoy (emphasis on boy)...ugh. Not worth the price of that milkshake, or the sacrifice that your throat would have made.
I am damn proud of you!!
Posted by: Dana at September 20, 2006 06:07 PM (Zp/ni)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
September 18, 2006
Must... Get Through... Today....
I think I've got a concussion.
I was sitting at the base of our stairs because it's a good place to watch TV and talk on the phone (to
this lovely lady, my
homeboy, and then my Mom last night, actually). It's far enough away from the TV that it's not blaring into the phone, but directly across from the screen. Plus the carpet is pretty nice. Nicest carpet we've ever had, in fact.
So I was chatting away with Mom and the Princess decided to favor me with one of her toys. Not thinking clearly, I leaned over to pick it up, and then sat up to toss it for her.
When I sat up, I brought the top of my head into direct contact with the bottom end of the handrail of the stairs at full speed.
You know the little birdies on the Warner Brothers' cartoons? Yeah, I saw those.
Anyway, after about 30 minutes of ice and two Advil, I was ok, but this morning I'm sore all over and the headache? She refuses the Advil and caffeine treatment. I've had post concussion syndrome before (dropped on my head in college), so I know the drill. At least it's just a regular headache, not a migraine, although even my damn teeth hurt.
Now it's just a matter of sitting here two hours and then driving home. Yay, home. Maybe I'll bugger off early. I do have things I need to work on at home....
Posted by: caltechgirl at
12:45 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 250 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Ouch. Hope you are feeling better soon.
Posted by: vw bug at September 18, 2006 01:38 PM (HVeEK)
2
Yowza!! Hope you're better soon - wouldn't a margarita help? (at least until the morning, but then it's a whole night without the headache!)
Posted by: Mrs_Who at September 18, 2006 02:27 PM (NfSVQ)
3
I feel your pain!
Did you see my post on my drunken escapade 2 weekends ago?
Posted by: Sissy at September 18, 2006 06:45 PM (e+8WB)
4
Yikes!!!! Take it easy...
Posted by: Amy at September 18, 2006 07:15 PM (DWNNI)
5
Good Lord almighty...
Feel better, mah dear. ((HUGS))
Posted by: Dana at September 18, 2006 10:25 PM (Zp/ni)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
September 16, 2006
Out of place, much?
Hubby and I were doing some shopping today, and we went into a local home and decorating store. I was looking for a large casserole dish, so we went over to the kitchen section.
As we browsed the Clearance section, I noticed what clearly HAD to be a
Wilton Armetale tray. These things just don't hang around long enough to make it to clearance, you know? I was intrigued to say the least.
So I asked him to pick it up:

The pattern on the edge was a bit unusual, so I looked at it more closely:

Yep, that's the
Baltimore Ravens' logo. When we turned the tray over, it indeed said Wilton Armetale, but it also said "manufactured for Smyth and Co, Official Jewelers of the Baltimore Ravens".
So if you're a Ravens fan stuck in SoCal, and you'd like to have a fancy tailgate party, let me know and I'll tell you where you can find a nice serving tray for cheap.
BTW, nice pics for a camera phone, huh?
Posted by: caltechgirl at
04:52 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 175 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Frick'n awesome pictures for a cellphone.
Posted by: vw bug at September 16, 2006 05:42 PM (HVeEK)
2
Absolutely amazing cell phone pics!
Posted by: Dana at September 16, 2006 06:02 PM (WXRT4)
3
I'm guessing a Sprint phone.
Posted by: Sissy at September 16, 2006 06:30 PM (e+8WB)
4
You should have bought it and sold it on ebay. I'm sure some Ravens fan would have bought it.
Posted by: Amanda at September 17, 2006 07:55 AM (/dWd3)
5
Wow -- great pics from a phone!!
Posted by: Marie at September 18, 2006 09:07 AM (XzzJz)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
September 15, 2006
Project Runway: Olympus Fashion Week
The final fashion show pictures are up at Getty Images!
Click
here for all the images.
Or go
here to see the looks sorted by designer.
So
far it looks like Laura is the only one without a swimsuit. Please, oh
great fashion deities, say it isn't so, say Laura ISN'T the decoy.
Also, Nazri is modeling for Uli.... which may indicate a last minute model shuffle. Not good.
My
first impressions: Jeffrey pulled a Santino. I actually LIKE his clothes.
Especially the very 1940's swimsuit and the green striped dress. Uli
is Uli. Yeccch. But she actually made pants, I think. Laura is
Laura, but at least she did a number of different silhouettes and some
of the dresses are really fun. Michael: what a disappointment. Some
of the dresses are nice, but mostly it looks like a bad hip-hop
video.....
Jay McCarroll shows in an hour......
Posted by: caltechgirl at
10:59 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 154 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Ah, I missed it! I'm sure I'll catch it on rerun
Posted by: Sissy at September 16, 2006 06:32 PM (e+8WB)
2
Jeffery has tamed down for sure. I've been more impressed with Michael through the season, this is a disappointment. I wanted the ATL guy to win.
Posted by: Morrigan at September 16, 2006 08:55 PM (XEfyO)
3
I'm going to ask an ignorant question, I'm sure. What is this decoy you speak of? Is this something you know of from a previous season or did I just miss something when I missed this last episode? I feel lost.
Posted by: Angela at September 19, 2006 07:28 PM (J/6Sa)
4
the fashion week runway show happens before the episode in which the final three are revealed. therefore the person who gets 4th place has a show as well so that no one knows who the top three are until that episode airs.
i liked uli's the best, you cant blame her for doing "uli" dresses because it is an Uli fashion show. I liked michaels except for that orange nightmare outfit. i think laura's was the worst. all of jeffery's models looked fat.
Posted by: dillon at September 24, 2006 01:22 PM (fEnUg)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
September 13, 2006
I'll be in the Ladies Room
I just got FLOOR TICKETS to the Barenaked Ladies.
Tickets don't go on sale for another week, but Ladies Room members got first dibs today!
Yay!
Posted by: caltechgirl at
04:42 PM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 37 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I've seen them before although it was way back in the lawn seats. They were great though! Very entertaining!
Posted by: Sissy at September 13, 2006 05:36 PM (e+8WB)
2
STOP IT!
THAT'S AWESOME!
Posted by: wRitErsbLock at September 13, 2006 06:33 PM (0Pi1o)
Posted by: Amanda at September 14, 2006 05:46 AM (ay+rD)
4
Floor Tickets?! /sigh You're super awesome!
Posted by: Princess Jami at September 14, 2006 12:53 PM (0gPLe)
5
This? This would be jealousy over here.
Posted by: Helen at September 15, 2006 09:10 AM (e30qC)
6
Oh I love the BNL! It's awesome that you got tickets early!
Posted by: Richmond at September 15, 2006 12:28 PM (e8QFP)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
September 12, 2006
So this is supporting the troops, huh? Try actually speaking to them
SMASH has
the definitive, straight from the horses' mouths. Including Code Pink's reaction to ACTUAL soldiers.
Posted by: caltechgirl at
10:45 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 40 words, total size 1 kb.
Whoah!
Have y'all seen Dancing With the Stars this season?
Joey Lawrence:

then.... and now
Posted by: caltechgirl at
10:13 PM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 15 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Hmmm, trying to pull a Howie Mandel on us is he? LOL Dagnabit, no I missed it...what evening does it come on?
Posted by: Alabama Improper at September 12, 2006 10:37 PM (X1JEn)
Posted by: wRitErsbLock at September 13, 2006 06:17 AM (0uaKa)
Posted by: Greta (Hooah Wife) at September 13, 2006 07:34 AM (Cbtbf)
4
Holy crap! *That's* Joey Lawrence??? :^0
Posted by: Richmond at September 13, 2006 02:57 PM (e8QFP)
5
Who in the hell is Joey Lawrence? This is a generational thing isn't it?
Posted by: Bou at September 13, 2006 04:18 PM (iHxT3)
6
Woah!
I'll say it again in Joey's voice:
WOAH!
Posted by: Mark at September 13, 2006 07:07 PM (lbnn5)
Posted by: Dana at September 16, 2006 06:03 PM (WXRT4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Today's the Day!
So much so that I ran out and picked these up before work today to be sure they wouldn't be sold out:
The
ORIGINAL THEATRICAL VERSIONS. You know, where Han shoots first.
I am so freaking excited! I bought these on VHS (on a whim) the last time they were released in 1996 or 1997, shortly before the "Special Edition" movies were released, and I watch them only rarely for fear of destroying the tapes. Now I have them in a much more durable format. Yay!
Posted by: caltechgirl at
10:05 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 92 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Amanda at September 12, 2006 10:29 AM (ay+rD)
2
I'm sure hubby already knows, but I'll send him your post as a reminder.
I suppose that means a trip to Best Buy on the way home tonight.
Posted by: wRitErsbLock at September 12, 2006 10:54 AM (QP6Jm)
3
Remember when Lucas said that he'd never release the original theatrical releases? I knew that he was lying them: there's too much money to be made from originalists like me.
And it isn't SWIV: A New Hope. It's STAR WARS, damn it!
Does that sound whiny? I meant it to.
Posted by: physics geek at September 18, 2006 10:43 AM (KqeHJ)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
September 11, 2006
As you may have noticed...
The
2996 site is down. Mirrors can be found
here and
hereThe

company hosting their domain basically told them, sorry, you're
SOL.
Today of all days. When the site traffic spiked, the hosting company basically told them that they would not increase their bandwidth allowance and they should look elsewhere for services.
In case you want to make sure you
DONT ever do business with such an unreliable host, the group to avoid is
ehostpros.comNo I will not link them.
I will, however, give you all of their contact addresses so that you may email them and tell them what a crock of shit it is to shut down the 2996 page on 9/11:
sales@ehostpros.combilling@ehostpros.comabuse@ehostpros.cominfo@ehostpros.com
Posted by: caltechgirl at
02:07 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 121 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Mike at September 11, 2006 02:33 PM (GIL7z)
2
Well then... Another host on my "don't do business with them" list. The other being the very popular Dreamhost. And Go Daddy is not evil but has some technical and user interface issues that are going to keep me away.
Unreal.
Posted by: Jay at September 11, 2006 04:12 PM (CknKD)
3
Rooster Tootsie Roll Pop? heh
Posted by: Mark at September 11, 2006 04:13 PM (rxObf)
4
I was wondering what had happened. What a bunch of assholes.
Posted by: Bou at September 11, 2006 06:58 PM (iHxT3)
5
how slow am I? I saw this post last night and it took me all night and all morning to decipher the graphic correctly.
Rooster lollipop? I don't get it.
Cock lollipop? I don't get it.
Cock balloon? nope, that's not it.
Sheesh I'm slow!
Posted by: wRitErsbLock at September 12, 2006 09:27 AM (QP6Jm)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
9/11/01
Never Forget
10:29 am:
Cox and Forkum Sum it Up (with a good link round up, below, as well)
This post stays on top today. Scroll down for more content.
Posted by: caltechgirl at
08:49 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 49 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Oh God, I don't know why I torment myself ....
In the first days of the attack I must have watched that footage well over 200 times in some masochistic attempt to make myself truly absorb the enormous ... horrific ... loss of lives.
Posted by: erica at September 11, 2006 01:21 PM (cs95G)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
The WTC and Me...
When I was 17 years old, in the summer of 1994, I was part of a summer program that invited science students to New York for two week to study and be a part of "real" high level research. Among the amazing and wonderful things we did that summer was a tour of New York City. After taking the Circle line out to the Statue of Liberty and back, we boarded the bus and went into downtown. We stopped at the foot of the World Trade Center.
I remember looking up and up and up, unable to see the top. Wondering at the immense feat of engineering standing before me. Face to face with these twin giants, my friend and I laughed at the presumption of a handful of terrorists who tried to bring it down with a truck bomb. My friend J said, "You know, they built the towers to withstand a hit by a 747." We were all duly impressed. It seemed like overkill.
And it became a joke amongst us.
Fast forward 7 years.
September 11, 2001. 9 am.
I was sleeping in. It had been a late night Monday night, as a friend who had been staying with us in NC was set to fly back to CA that afternoon. Also, I was supposed to teach that afternoon after taking her to the airport.
The phone rang. It was my husband, stationed in TX in the army. "Turn on the TV." he said. "Any channel".
I fumbled for the remote, half awake, and turned on the TV to see the WTC, one tower standing, the other on fire from a gaping hole near the top. The morning show people were just beginning to realize that it wasn't a cessna that hit the building, but a fully loaded jumbo jetliner.
Before I could comprehend that, another jet hit the other tower. And I knew.
My heart stood still. But still, I thought, the buildings will stand. The people can get out, or be rescued from the roof, right?
I called my parents and Ben, woke up my friends, and crawled to the big TV in the den. What next? Were there more planes? Were any of my friends there?
The rest of the day is a blur of images: People jumping from the buildings, the towers collapsing in a cloud of ash, that video of the asian woman running in high heels and nearly being run down as the towers collapsed behind her. I remember screaming "just take your damn shoes off so you can run..."
I don't remember eating, and I don't think I slept. I just sat in front of the tv. The towers came down. They were supposed to withstand the unthinkable, that kind of hit, but they came down anyway.
I spoke to my friend a few days later. We reminisced about that day at the towers, and how we all believed them to be invincible. And how that came to stand for a lot of things. And now those things were gone.
I think we grew up a lot on September 11, 2001. But it's easy to forget. It's easy to over analyze and twist the facts to fit your own mindset instead of facing the difficult facts:
+Nineteen Islamofascist fuckheads hijacked four planes
+They deliberately chose flights that would be the fullest and carry the most fuel
+They succeeded in crashing three of those planes into pre-selected targets
+It was NOT a government conspiracy. Unless you mean the governments of Iran, Syria, etc.
+2,996 innocent people died. Many of them heroes who died trying to save the lives of others
+Unless we wipe jihadist thinking from the face of this planet, something like 9/11 WILL happen again
And if you don't believe that with even some small part of your soul, then you need to get your head out of your ass.
Posted by: caltechgirl at
08:29 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 659 words, total size 3 kb.
1
I was just talking to a friend about that day and I had about the same rememberance too. I will always remember sharing that day with you and how our nation changed. Let's not forget that our nation survived and is stronger today and honor the memories of the people who lst their lives that day.
Posted by: Sarah at September 11, 2006 11:00 AM (9oK43)
2
RE: the getting your head out of your ass part...
Before the attacks, I used to listen to NPR every morning, while I got ready for work. In the days immediately following 9/11, I got so disgusted with them & switched stations. Never went back.
I felt like I had taken my head out of the sand & they hadn't.
Posted by: Marie at September 11, 2006 11:35 AM (XzzJz)
3
I'm a day late, but Amen Sister. I still get knots in my stomach...
Posted by: Richmond at September 12, 2006 01:45 PM (e8QFP)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
90kb generated in CPU 0.0368, elapsed 0.1035 seconds.
85 queries taking 0.081 seconds, 298 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.