March 13, 2009
Happy Pi Day 2009!
3.14 Enjoy some pi(e)!

And Happy Birthday Albert Einstein! Today would be # 130!
Posted by: caltechgirl at
11:18 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 21 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Nah, pi day is still seven years away.
Posted by: Xrlq at March 14, 2009 07:44 PM (DI4j5)
2
yep...that be pie cause everbody know what pie r round and cornbread r square
Posted by: GUYK at March 22, 2009 01:40 PM (jMQH8)
3
I just want someone to tell me how grinding PIES in the faces of faculty members on March 12 (yes, the 12th!!!!) teaches kids anything about pi?
Years from now, they'll be arguing with their remedial math instructor: "NO! I'm teling you pi equals 3.12, man!
Posted by: Ms. Cornelius at March 23, 2009 03:19 PM (TiG6Y)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
March 11, 2009
February 27, 2009
Friday night fights
Well, so it didn't turn out terrible. We were taken seriously by some of the lions referenced below.
We'll see where things go from here.
And seriously, I have the awesomest husband in the universe. I came home to delivery chinese food ordered and an expensive bottle of sparkling pink wine in the fridge.
Egg rolls and pink bubbles really make all the bullshit fade away. Going to spend this weekend chilling and enjoying my time away from stress-world. See you on the flip side. Or at least on Twitter and Facebook.
Posted by: caltechgirl at
07:34 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 95 words, total size 1 kb.
1
What a great hubby. Hope all continues to go the way you want and that you don't get hurt in the process.
Posted by: vw bug at March 02, 2009 03:40 AM (FPOeI)
Posted by: Lauren at March 09, 2009 05:53 PM (0yRmw)
Posted by: 货架 at May 12, 2009 05:21 AM (49N5c)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
February 26, 2009
Friday Countdown
Tomorrow we attempt to beard the lion in its den. I could use any prayers or good wishes you can put forward. Not for me, though. For our students. If things continue as they are, my students will be the ones who will suffer the most.
I just want so much to be a part of effecting a change that will make things WORK.
Thanks in advance. I'll keep you posted.
Posted by: caltechgirl at
11:16 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 73 words, total size 1 kb.
February 16, 2009
Serial Twit
caltechgirl it's not about IDEOLOGY, you fucking turd it's about breaking poor people's backs. Gas goes up $0.14/ gallon INSTANTLY
caltechgirl Sales tax OVER 10%, and then increases in income tax and car fees. Do you want people to MOVE OUT FASTER?
caltechgirl I wish I hated my house and I could afford to sell it. I'd leave CA tomorrow.
caltechgirl I can't afford to stay.
caltechgirl FTR, the fucking turd in question was some stupid ass liberal state senator who evidently only represents RICH PEOPLE
caltechgirl I
think if you find yourself in a hole this deep, the first question you
should be asking is not how do we fill the hole, but rather...
caltechgirl ... how did we get here? What are the bad decisions that led us here. And then don't repeat them.
caltechgirl Because you can only blame "the economy" so much.
caltechgirl I
thought the democrats were the champions of poor people. I guess that's
true only until they need them to bear the brunt of their mistakes.
The above was in response to some opportunist idiot on the TV taking advantage of the camera in his face to make the budget mess all about Democrats vs. Republicans.
That's just ignorant. What it's about is how much are we going to take and who's listening. Have you heard the man-on-the street interviews in the media? NO ONE wants you to solve the problem by choking us to death with taxes. NO ONE. Yes, some tax increases are necessary, but how are we spending the money? Isn't there something that can be done without shoving it, quite literally, on to the backs of your constituents?
I've heard both sides point out that this economy is based on spending. Great. Explain to me, then, how people can get the economy going by spending when it costs them more NOT ONLY to buy items, but also TO GET TO THE STORE. And more of their income goes back to the state to begin with. These people are barely spending, and you're threatening to put a BIGGER hurt on their wallet?
You don't improve this state by taking money from people. You encourage them to give the state more than you would take by giving them incentives to buy.
As much as I hate the sheer size of the "porkulus" package that the President will sign tomorrow, I have to point out that it is based on INCENTIVES. And maybe that's why people were willing to pass it. Because the help is obvious. It's money going to people. Not coming out of their pockets. At least not today.
Posted by: caltechgirl at
11:34 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 430 words, total size 6 kb.
1
Because the help is obvious.
Actually, I would beg to differ.Money going to people has to come from somewhere. Since the government produces nothing, that money comes from other people. This is unlikely, on the whole, to be of any help, as we're rapidly approaching the point where
1) There aren't enough people to soak anymore
2) China grows uneasy enough with our nation's debt that they stop lending, or start calling some of their markers due.
Economic downturns occur. I would posit that whatever DC does is likely to lengthen and exacerbate the recovery. I base that opinion on empirical evidence from the past.
Is there spending in the bill that I support? Sure. Roads, bridges and other infrastructure ( I work in power generation) in this country are antiquated and should be updated or replaced. Unfortunately, these needs existed before, but they aren't really vote buyers, which is why things like the Minnesota bridge collapse happen.
Posted by: physics geek at February 17, 2009 09:28 AM (MT22W)
2
I thought the democrats were the champions of poor people.
They are. That's why they have created so many of them by taking as many jobs, homes, and as much money as they away from the middle class and the rich. The more poor, the more power they gain. And that is what they're after, isn't it?
Posted by: DCE at February 17, 2009 07:26 PM (bzJcf)
3
Problem is not that there is not enough money..there is just too much spending by governments...governments at all levels. And since governments NEVER produce anything it is always someone else's money that governments spend.
The only way to beat them is to quit producing anymore than it takes to live. When there is no one left to loot they will have to feed off each other and maybe that will be the end of them
Posted by: GUYK at February 19, 2009 11:59 AM (uyoGg)
4
I downtown with you wanting to get the fuck out of CA. Too bad Big Sur is on the Left coast instead of the Right.
Posted by: Sam at February 20, 2009 04:55 AM (kN++T)
Posted by: 货架、 at March 26, 2009 06:14 AM (8j21L)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
February 14, 2009
Valentines Zen
Valentine's Day together #1: bought each other the SAME valentine stuffed animal. Entirely without consultation. Giggles and kisses ensued.
Valentine's Day together #15: walk into Costco, notice motion-detector fixture on good sale, toss it into cart. Look at roses and strawberries on display across from motion detectors and go, "Oh yeah, Valentine's Day."
Somehow, #15 was a hell of a lot better.
Posted by: caltechgirl at
03:48 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 64 words, total size 1 kb.
1
LOL! I know what you mean!
Happy VD to both of you!
Posted by: Pam at February 14, 2009 04:24 PM (l6NIn)
Posted by: 货架、 at March 26, 2009 06:03 AM (8j21L)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
February 13, 2009
Unexpected Zen
I was hoping to post a video of Sunny Came Home for today's Zen. So I went looking on YouTube. Where I found this. I love how the music fits with the video, and well, the song definitely applies to Hermione. Don't fuck with her.
Pretty unexpectedly awesome, except the whole Hermione needs to get with Harry ending. I always knew she'd end up with Ron....
Posted by: caltechgirl at
07:24 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 70 words, total size 1 kb.
February 11, 2009
Today's moment of Zen

There Will Be Rest
by Sara Teasdale
There will be rest, and sure stars shining
Over the roof-tops crowned with snow,
A reign of rest, serene forgetting,
The music of stillness holy and low.
I will make this world of my devising
Out of a dream in my lonely mind,
I shall find the crystal of peace, -above me
Stars I shall find.
(right click and save)
Posted by: caltechgirl at
10:22 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 74 words, total size 1 kb.
February 10, 2009
Your Moment of Zen
Dark, strangely calming zen.
Metallica, Wherever I May Roam.
Thanks, honey, for leaving the Black Album in the CD player.
Posted by: caltechgirl at
10:02 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 28 words, total size 1 kb.
February 06, 2009
I'm pretty sure I am going to lose my job
And it's not my fault.
Gross $$ mismanagement means we are losing both faculty and programs. And no, they won't tell us who yet. 10 days to sweat it out.
Anybody know anyone looking for science PhDs?
Maybe I will get to take advantage of that mortgage bailout after all.
Now, if you'll excuse me I need to clean up my face and go teach while I still have a class TO teach.
Posted by: caltechgirl at
07:30 AM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 89 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Marie at February 06, 2009 01:53 PM (UunPp)
2
OMG!!! I am going to be sending positive thoughts and prayers your way... {{hugs}}
Posted by: Richmond at February 07, 2009 10:47 AM (qozSm)
3
Oh, that stinks! I'll keep you in my prayers.
Posted by: Jenna at February 09, 2009 07:26 AM (fd/rX)
4
I am sorry to hear it and wish you well. I'm pretty much on the same edge too.
Posted by: Cappy at February 09, 2009 05:37 PM (gmOLL)
5
Given that you live in California I'd guess that one round of cuts won't be enough. Dust off your resume and start making phone calls. I have no doubt you can make it through this one way or another.
Posted by: Aaron at February 10, 2009 01:27 PM (a2Y1Y)
6
I am so sorry to hear that! You will be in my thoughts.
Posted by: oddybobo at February 12, 2009 11:13 AM (mZfwW)
7
*sigh* Of course this is what happened to my husband a few years ago. Then last month he managed to make it through the layoffs at his company. They told everyone before Christmas there would be big layoffs in January.
He had to sit and sweat it out all day that day. Didn't find out he wasn't on the list until 6pm when his boss called to say the layoffs were done.
Layoffs suck pond water big time. I'm really sorry you have to go through this. Only advice I have is write up your resume and start looking right now for something else. It's basically all you can do and it's awful.
Posted by: Teresa at February 12, 2009 07:36 PM (ybEr8)
8
More good thoughts headed your way.
Posted by: Christina at February 14, 2009 06:03 AM (7igc6)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
February 04, 2009
A New Hunt for the Nuge
Ted Nugent is hunting a new animal these days,
The Porkasaurus!
I'm on the track of one, a bigger more dangerous critter than I've ever hunted before: the Obama-Pelosi Porkosaurus.
The Porkosaurus is plenty dangerous by itself. It subsidizes unemployment by increasing unemployment benefits. And, as the man said, when you subsidize something you get more of it. It doesn't spend anything -- not one thin dime -- on the one thing that economists say is guaranteed to stimulate the economy, defense spending. And its whole purpose is to feed Fedzilla and make it grow even bigger, swallowing our economy whole.
Click over and read the rest. Uncle Ted has some interesting ideas about stalking the beast and starving it to death.
If you've never read Ted before, you're in for a treat.
Posted by: caltechgirl at
08:24 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 143 words, total size 1 kb.
1
how exactly is defense spending "guaranteed to stimulate the economy"?
and I'm sorry, but unemployment benefits can stimulate the economy. If the unemployed don't get benefits, they have no money to spend. If they get benefits, they have money to spend, this money, in turn gets spent buying things, which means production of more things, transportation of more things, and the sale of more things - all of which mean jobs. More jobs means fewer people needing unemployment. But in the here and now, with unemployment close to double what it has been for the last 16 years, unemployment benefits aren't a bad thing.
Posted by: KG at February 04, 2009 09:28 AM (jjrBh)
2
Manual Trackback™
But yeah, I'm with KG on the defense spending part. It's not a stimulus for the economy.
I don't think the unemployment benefits are much of a stimulus either, though. Maybe some but not a lot. The problem is that expanded benefits have to be paid from tax money which also could have stimulated the economy had it remained in private hands instead of being filtered through an expensive bureaucracy. I'm all for cushioning the blow from job loss but there are limits to how much we can and should expand benefits.
Posted by: Ken S, Fifth String on the Banjo of Life at February 06, 2009 06:46 AM (PvqFn)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
What do Klingons and Toilet Paper have in common?
Evidently you
find both in a 7-11 in Colorado Springs.
Colorado Springs police are looking for a man who hit two 7-Eleven convenience stores early Wednesday, armed with a Klingon sword.
The first robbery was reported at 1:50 a.m., at 145 N Spruce St. The clerk told police a white man in his 20s, wearing a black jacket, blue jeans and wearing a black mask, entered the store with a weapon the clerk recognized from the Star Trek TV series.
That weapon was a Bat'leth, a crescent-shaped Klingon blade.

Now that's some serious Bij!
I'm not sure which is worse, using the bat'leth to rob the 7-11 or knowing its name, as both clerks evidently did.
Or maybe that I knew how to spell it and the reporter clearly doesn't.
Scroll down and check out the comments on the news article. Pretty funny stuff, especially if you know some Klingon....
h/t Stacy (via twitter)
Posted by: caltechgirl at
08:09 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 170 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Wow, not that is nutty. I wonder if the robber spoke 'Klingon' too?
Posted by: Comrade Tovya at February 04, 2009 02:02 PM (DAaYy)
2
All of the local news sites commentary sections are loaded with humor. How do you take someone seriously when they use their as their weapon in a robbery?
Posted by: Stacy at February 04, 2009 04:25 PM (92p8H)
3
I think the worst is that my husband started critiquing the robber's form: "He's not even holding the Bat'leth correctly."
Posted by: Jenna at February 05, 2009 11:56 AM (fd/rX)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 30, 2009
Keep your laws off my octuplets!
Unless you've been living under a rock, you've likely already seen the story of the Southern California who woman who gave birth to the world's first known surviving
set of octuplets.
What you may not know, is that (no surprise) despite the family's plea for privacy, the vultures have been hard at work and have discovered that she already has (gasp!) six children, these babies were conceived (gasp!) via IVF, and that she's (wait for it........) a single mother living with her bankrupt parents.
"Where are the ethics??" scream the journos and the academics. "How could you justify fertility treatment for a woman who already has a pack of kids? Don't you have a MORAL OBLIGATION to keep a poor (reputedly on Medicaid), single woman from populating the planet with her bastards that the rest of us are going to have to support?"
There oughta be a law! A law I tell ya! (read the comments here)
Well, there is a law. Just not here. I'm sure you've heard of China.
The selfsame "voices of the people" who decry this woman's choice to have a large family are the same folks who cry out bitterly about China's One Child policy.
Either fertility is regulated or it is not. How many children is too many? Is it a sliding scale based on your ability to pay for them? If so, I'd wager most of us would have disappeared up the abortionist's vacuum tube.
Somehow they also fail to mention that if it's my choice to have a child or not, that includes BOTH outcomes: having the baby or not having the baby. The faceless critics lamenting this woman's "irresponsible choice" (a phrase uttered by a so-called Bio-Ethics expert during a news report this morning) are also the same crew lobbying so hard to keep abortion legal.
I'm sorry, but I thought "Keep your laws off my body" was an absolute. Or does that just apply to the popular choices?
I haven't even touched the infertility aspect of this case. Many of my dear friends struggle with infertility, some have pursued multiple courses of treatment. Some, ultimately, decided that the pursuit was futile despite the deepest longings of their heart for a biological child. Having seen the struggle that so many endure, it seems to me that any successful procedure resulting in a healthy baby is a win. Perhaps those of you who have been down this road would like to chime in.
Certainly, it is a pertinent question, how will this mom support 14 children? But how does a 14 year old support one baby? How do two parents with two careers handle two or three small ones? Raising kids is not easy for anyone at anytime. 14 children, including (reportedly) 2 with special needs and 8 infants presents a huge challenge, but that doesn't mean necessarily that the children will be neglected or hungry. In fact, it's entirely possible that these 14 kids will be MUCH better off than some kids with only one or two siblings.
You can't have it both ways, either people get to choose the family they want, or they don't. And if they don't, who makes the rules? Based on what?
It works so well elsewhere, after all....
Posted by: caltechgirl at
11:47 AM
| Comments (9)
| Add Comment
Post contains 555 words, total size 4 kb.
1
Excellent article, truly! If the parent is not able to care for the children at that point the state would step in and take them. But like you said... how do we know she can or can't? It's none of our dang business.
Posted by: pam at January 30, 2009 12:01 PM (l6NIn)
2
Beautifully said. And quite right. Once you start trying to legislate this kind of thing - it's bad for everyone and you end up like China.
Of course I wonder where she got the money for IVF - is it covered under medicaid? I won't take anything the media says as being true - they have tipped their hand on how they feel about any children at all... So I'll just go back to my life and not worry about this woman... Imagine that - I'm going to walk away and let her live her own life!!!
Posted by: Teresa at January 30, 2009 02:03 PM (ybEr8)
3
the local media have stated that the mom works at a fertility clinic. Insinuating, of course, that her bosses provided free services since IVF is NOT covered by Medicaid.
Posted by: caltechgirl at January 30, 2009 02:46 PM (IfXtw)
4
Ouch. I'm split both ways on this. I'm totally against any government interference in this matter, but I hope to hell she's able to care for all of them. I have nothing but the utmost contempt for mothers who keep having children and don't take care of them (like my wife's niece). Either other family members have to pick up the slack, or they end up in foster care (almost the worst outcome). If they are going to continue having kids they have to take full responsibility for their raising and care.
Legal sanctions for a mother's irresponsibility? Probably. I think the niece should be breaking rocks until every last one of her kids (5 at last count) turn 18. But government dictating how many kids one can and cannot have? Sorry, that's how China handles things. Caltechgirl's argument wins.
Posted by: diamond dave at January 30, 2009 07:16 PM (iBUsJ)
5
I'm confused -- I went to the links but I only saw comments indicating that they thought the mother was irresponsible. Where are the "journos and the academics" who are screaming that the government should regulate the privacy of a woman's body? Though I think it *is* freaking irresponsible to have ANY child, one or six or eight, when you cannot not emotionally, physically, or financially support them, I don't know anyone who says (other than insane web people who I've never met) that there should be a law that regulates the number of children people can have in this country.
Posted by: SBC at January 31, 2009 08:03 AM (1Q6g4)
6
Did you even SEE the news? These talking heads were EVERYWHERE.
Posted by: caltechgirl at January 31, 2009 10:23 AM (IfXtw)
7
I'll be honest, I don't watch the local news that much if at all. But I do watch CM, KO, and RM -- the liberal trifecta of talking heads -- and I don't remember them saying anything other than it happened and I can't even remember if all of them said the the births happened. Most of what I've been reading or seeing is about the stimulus bill anyway...
I remember a story on NBC saying that octuplets are at risk for a ton of health things (which is in fact GOOD that they reported on that)...maybe its on the morning shows? I mean, I can understand people talking about the responsibility of the woman the same way I can understand talking about the responsibility of teenage pregnancies but there were talking heads who said we should regulate how many children? Are these talking heads who are saying this on Fox?
But it sounds like that issue that people are having isn't so much about how many children can one have but should IVF procedures be cleared to someone that has more than double the average number of children per American household. It may be treated like organ donation where medical boards decide if people are either young enough or healthy enough for the procedure because even though IVF has a hefty bill at the end (so its usually a procedure only available to the upper middle class - rich groups), it still takes time and resources from other people. But that's going to be up to the individual hospitals and companies probably in the end...I would be surprised if it ever became a legal issue and I would imagine every *real* pro-choice woman would fight any regulation.
Posted by: SBC at January 31, 2009 03:10 PM (1Q6g4)
8
I completely agree that it's nobody's business as to how many children a person should be able to bring into this world, especially not the business of any government. BUT...
Prospective adoptive parents have to go through rigorous background checks, psychological, financial, etc., especially here in the United States, which is why so many end up going to China for their unwanted children. Why shouldn't there be some sort of the rigorous background checks for prospective in vitro fertilizations? Especially some serious looking into someone's psyche as to why after having experienced the thrill of parenthood 6 times over anyone needs to reproduce again. If it is so necessary to have even 1 more child, why not adopt? AND...
From what I have come to understand of this situation (just so happens this young woman lives in my hometown of Whittier) this mother of 14 children is not gainfully employed as she is a full-time college student, nor is there a father in the picture. I would assume (and I'm sure the media will dredge this up eventually) that the mother subsists on Welfare. God only knows how she can afford the in vitro process.
I was on Welfare years ago while trying to raise my 1 and only child after my divorce. I was 32 at the time (I had been had been gainfully employed and paid taxes since I was 16 years old), and I knew full well that I was at the government's mercy as to my personal life. I had to show bank statements, receipts from my utilities, receipts for childcare, and I was told that I could be investigated at any time, meaning they could come into my home, look in my cupboards, interview my neighbors, whatever.
So the media is doing to this woman what they should have done to our new president, and yes, in comparison, that is wrong on so many levels it boggles the mind. But once you put yourself in a position of being scrutinized whether for public office or for personal gain via benefit of living off of tax payer's dollars, all bets are off.
God bless her for not "selectively harvesting" 6 or 7 of these babies, but all in all, someone needs to take a hard look at the mindset of someone who needs to bear 6, 7, or 14 children when there are so many little one's who need homes.
Sorry to go on so long. Kind of a heated subject for me since speaking to several family members and friends who live in Whittier.
Posted by: My Awesome Mix Tape #6 at January 31, 2009 07:02 PM (K9H6U)
9
I didn't comment when you first posted because my initial snarky thought was that she did it so she could become a TV star and make money that way b/c of her huge family. Appears that is, in fact, the case.
To me that makes a big difference - I don't care how many kids you have, 1 or 15 or 25, you shouldn't be doing it in hopes of getting endorsement deals. Kids shouldn't be bargaining chips for career moves.
Posted by: beth at February 03, 2009 10:29 AM (Slkto)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 29, 2009
Pictures and stuff
Lots of new pics on the
Flickr page. Including Flea performing with the Caltech Jazz bands (and our own Kjerstin, too!) and lots of glorious jam/marmalade food pRon.
Like this:
Posted by: caltechgirl at
08:38 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 35 words, total size 1 kb.
January 27, 2009
The News from LA LA LAnd...
Most of the time, the news just disgusts me and
makes me sad....
But every once in a while it also
gives me hope....
Posted by: caltechgirl at
05:31 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 35 words, total size 1 kb.
1
They were interviewing the doctors today and asking how they could not have seen the 8th baby. What a stupid question. Eight little bodies all jumbled and you get on to the doctor for missing one? Jeez.
Posted by: Amy at January 27, 2009 06:16 PM (R8Y8+)
2
And how amazing and wonderful that the babies are all alive, all breathing on their own (that's what I think I heard), and some of them are even taking milk?
I was amazed at how matter-of-fact the doctors were.
But - I hope the parents have lots of help. LOTS of help. Eight kids in diapers at once....wow.
Posted by: ricki at January 28, 2009 10:20 AM (O5SYw)
3
8 Babies. Can you imagine........ I hope they have LOTS of help. LOTS.
Posted by: Navy CPO at January 29, 2009 08:39 AM (IrbU4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 21, 2009
Kiss Me, I'm Irish
Scots-Irish. But I digress. Seems O'bama is too. In fact, according to the Corrigans, there's no one as Irish as Barack O'bama. I thought this was hilarious.
h/t the always awesome Helen who is getting pretty tired of hearing this in the UK
Posted by: caltechgirl at
11:47 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 51 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I know it should seem un-PC, but it's actually ok and very funny. It's true, I'm kinda over it, but I laughed when I first heard it.
Posted by: Helen at January 22, 2009 03:43 AM (LewRx)
Posted by: Jenn at January 22, 2009 02:11 PM (QQLml)
3
Catchy little tune isn't it. I could easily see it being overdone just because of that. LOL.
Posted by: Teresa at January 26, 2009 12:38 PM (ybEr8)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Like Cheese on Chinese Food
Republican rhetoric coming from The One, that is:
I'm not a big fan of Jon Stewart, and I often think he's just plain unfunny. But when he nails it, he nails it. This made me laugh. A lot.
Thanks to my afternoon Therapy Pool pals (Hi Stan!) for telling me to find the clip!
Posted by: caltechgirl at
11:30 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 86 words, total size 4 kb.
1
I think between stuff like this and Biden's loose-cannon mouth (see: Chief Justice jokes, lame), there will be more quality comedy bits for Righties over the next 4 years.
Posted by: Ben at January 22, 2009 11:59 PM (U6sYX)
2
"When Obama says these thing, I don´t think he really means it. And that gives me hope."
I think Obama really doesn´t mean it, but why would that give anyone but a selfsatisfied millionaire clown hope?
Posted by: El Gordo at February 02, 2009 05:00 AM (3xGG6)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Comfort and Canning
While most of the rest of you either watched or avoided the evening festivities surrounding the adulation of The One, I was busy in the kitchen.
Ooey-Gooey Mac N Cheese with bacon for dinner. I needed comfort. That's the very definition of comfort food. Plus, I had to use up the last of the fancy cheeses from our New Year's Eve party, which were remarkably still mold-free. I didn't want to press my luck further. This was real white sauce Mac N Cheese, too. A first for me.
After dinner it was back to the stove. I'm like a kid after Christmas with my new toy. Some of you may recall I got a small-batch canning cookbook for Christmas and I have been waiting for the stars to align to use it ( and by stars I mean time, inclination, and pectin).
Last night I broke open the book for the first time and made a batch of Blood Orange Red Wine Marmalade. Sadly, because our blood oranges are tiny, it made only a cup and a half. Tonight I broke rule #1 and made a double batch. Which made just over 4 cups. YAY!
Then I decided to try and use up some of the apricots in the freezer that we got from our tree in the spring. Batch #2 was a Winter Pear Apricot Jam. That was tasty cleanup! That recipe made 5 cups after skimming. Not bad.
I was ably assisted by my awesome husband who is quickly learning the difference between tongs and jar lifters, and who has always been a dab ahnd at cutting, measuring, and heavy, hot lifting of pots and plates.
Net: 5.5 jars (+ a bowl in the fridge of leftover) Blood Orange Marmalade (two days), 5 jars Pear/ Apricot Jam, and half a casserole dish of leftover MacCheese.
Yum.
Pictures as soon as I get a chance to download.
Posted by: caltechgirl at
12:06 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 324 words, total size 2 kb.
1
I hope you saved the "foam" left over from skimming the jam. It makes the best breakfast jam.
Back when I helped my Mom make grape jam (from the concord grapes off my grandfather's farm fence row, about 8 quarts of juice after mashing, cooking, and straining through cheese cloth), we used to get nearly a pint of skimmed "foam" left over after canning the jam. That wasn't pressure cooker canned jam, but cooked jam that we later sealed with paraffin.
Canning is the ultimate Tom Sawyer Painting The Fence opportunity. We used to rope in the neighbor kids to help peel fruit during the canning season.
Posted by: The Thomas at January 21, 2009 09:21 PM (gT3Zf)
2
What time is dinner tomorrow? I'm hungry already.
Posted by: Pasadena Closet Conservative at January 21, 2009 10:03 PM (Q3iRb)
3
is there any better comfort food then mac n cheese? unless its kfc's mashed potatoes and gravy!
Posted by: kate at January 21, 2009 11:00 PM (8rwgl)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 20, 2009
My own thoughts
Just a few reflections on the Inauguration...
Funniest moment? Heard on C-Span open mike, Joe Biden arriving at the top of the stairs to walk down to the main platform: "Well, I made it."
Least expected moment? Rick Warren's prayer. I am not a fan of public prayer. For two reasons. One, prayer is (according to scripture) to be a personal, secret act. Two, public praying tends to become a sideshow: quoting, telling God all kinds of shit he already knows, showboating by the pray-er. You know what I mean. Warren's prayer followed a more humble structure: he praised God's greatness, he humbled himself, he asked for intercesion, and ended with the Lord's Prayer. Nice, actually.
Best moment? The Williams Quartet with YoYo Ma and Itzak Perlman. Amazing. And yes, I am a sucker for both Ma and Perlman. Especially Perlman, whose playing regularly moves me to tears.
Most surreal moment: Again, captured by the C-Span open mike: At the end of Obama's oath, the crowd began chanting "CHANGE!" a la Randy Marsh.
By the time The One spoke, I was getting sleepy. I noted that the first half of the speech sounded like a Republican (personal responsibility, huh?). And then I crashed.
I could have done without Aretha. Hang it up sister. Your voice is going away, as it does to all divas at your age. Let us remember you at your finest. She did have a killer hat on, though.
Finally, poor Chief Justice. His nerves got the best of him and he flubbed the Oath. Here's hoping he gets it right in four years.
What say you?
Posted by: caltechgirl at
12:36 PM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 268 words, total size 2 kb.
1
I didn't watch. I am a head-burying ostrich

Also, I'm at work.
Posted by: Ken S, Fifth String on the Banjo of Life at January 20, 2009 01:21 PM (PvqFn)
2
I had to work and didn't watch. Then again I wouldn't have watched even I wasn't working. I've never watched one in the past and really, I had no desire to start now.
Posted by: Contagion at January 20, 2009 04:06 PM (Jfxjt)
3
I hadn't planned to watch, but my new bosses had the tv on the entire day, and invited me to come watch the inauguration. So, despite what I said about it, apparently you COULD pay me to watch.
I'm pissed to now know the names of both daughters. My goal for the next 4 was to never know their names. Thanks to Warren praying their names, I know them. Grrrr.
I loved Aretha's hat, not her song.
Loved Yo Yo Ma and Itzak Pearlman! My bosses had no clue who they were as I gushed. We're from very different backgrounds.
Posted by: wRitErsbLock at January 20, 2009 07:12 PM (0Pi1o)
4
Just tell me what's NOT racist about "when white will embrace what is right."
Seriously.
Posted by: caltechgirl at January 20, 2009 11:30 PM (IfXtw)
5
Ah, I see. I thought originally you were talking about the color referencing -- I didn't realize you took offense only about the comment about white people. Yeah, that wasn't very PC, but I think you're personalizing it. It was said in hyperbole, referencing a long history of one ethnic group having power and control and not always having moral justification. It would be absurd if he meant that all white people today are bigoted racists. In fact, the text of that part of the benediction was about exercising racial caution.
I didn't feel it was racist, but I guess I can see how some people would be sensitive to it -- my white husband didn't get offended and neither did most of my other white friends, as they focused on the spirit of what he said.
But I am surprised that you would take offense to it, as then it would make a lot of things that you, your DH, and I have said into non-PC/racist stuff and certainly on our blogs.
Posted by: SBC at January 21, 2009 11:39 AM (L2+uQ)
6
i hated it all. the street fair mentality; what the moonbats did to president bush when he came in; michelle's clothes; lowery and his hateful self; even aretha's voice was disappointing. (i did like her hat somewhat though... very spiffy)
rick warren i didn't mind too much. i know michelle's feet were positively bleeding after walking in the parade --- those heels looked like they were pinching bigtime.
mostly, i hated the idea that W wasn't in the white house anymore. damn.
Posted by: kate at January 21, 2009 11:05 PM (8rwgl)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
I am not among the head-burying ostriches
Yes, I am going to watch the festivities tomorrow.
I am going to watch the O-bots cheer as their messiah of the new raises his right hand and takes the same oath George Washington did, using the bible of Abraham Lincoln.
Folks, like it or not this is our new President. Hail the peaceful transition of power so rare elsewhere, and common enough here that we take it for granted, don't ignore it like it will go away.
It's not going away for four more years. I for one can't hold my breath that long under the sand.
I am going to watch and rant and yell obscenities at the TV, at the idiots who don't remember the past as they bow down and worship The One. I am also going to cheer the new President and enjoy the presentations of the Inaugural Parade.
Because really folks, this is it. It's our history, like it or not, and we can be there for it, or we can pretend it didn't happen. I'm of the opinion that the revolution WILL be televised. And YouTubed. And I'd prefer to be able to talk about it firsthand anyway.
I don't blame those of you on media blackout. I get it. I feel you. But I just can't help but think it's another form of denial. And I can't be in denial for 4 more years.
Posted by: caltechgirl at
12:22 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 240 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I'm one of those on blackout. And yes, I'm embracing my denial... but it won't last long, trust me.
Posted by: pam at January 20, 2009 09:34 AM (l6NIn)
2
Your pictures are amazing!
I also fell in love with Morocco and now live in Marrakech. Please feel free to visit my website:
Morocco Property
Wishing you all the best
Salim
Posted by: Salim Arkadan at January 21, 2009 05:08 PM (ddgTx)
3
I was with you - watched it all... Good grief. I think I said - "holy crap we're fucked!" 3 times... Yeesh...
Posted by: Richmond at January 21, 2009 05:59 PM (77JrH)
4
I am all about fairness. I didn't watch Bush or any other president's inauguration. Plus, I have to work to pay my taxes!
Posted by: Amy at January 22, 2009 03:32 AM (R8Y8+)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
92kb generated in CPU 0.0255, elapsed 0.1016 seconds.
87 queries taking 0.0883 seconds, 283 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.