June 16, 2007
Ah-nuld gets it right
The Governator told a gathering of Hispanic journalists on Thursday that mainstreaming recent immigrants means
taking off their language crutches:
"You've got to turn off the Spanish television set" and avoid Spanish-language television, books and newspapers, the Republican governor said Wednesday night at the annual convention of the National Association of Hispanic Journalists.
"You're just forced to speak English, and that just makes you learn the language faster," Schwarzenegger said.
"I know this sounds odd and this is the politically incorrect thing to say, and I'm going to get myself in trouble," he said, noting that he rarely spoke German and was forced to learn English when he emigrated from Austria.
Schwarzenegger was responding to a question about how Hispanic students can improve academically. Many journalists for Spanish-language organizations in the audience were surprised by the remarks.
The best part? The predictable response:
"I'm sitting shaking my head not believing that someone would be so naive and out of it that he would say something like that," said Alex Nogales, president and chief executive of the National Hispanic Media Coalition.
Hispanic immigrants need Spanish-language media to stay informed and "function in this society," Nogales said.
I'd just like to point out that this dude is the one keeping his people down, ok. It's not the Man. It's the Hombre. I should remind Mr. Nogales of a couple of things. First, Mr. Schwarzenegger DIDN'T have the "native" language resources that you and your colleagues provide. And somehow, he managed to learn enough to be informed enough to be THE FRIGGING GOVERNOR of the richest, most diverse state in the US.
How much more functional than the Governor do Hispanic immigrants need to be in this society, Mr. Nogales?
Second, I'd like to invite Mr. Nogales to take a look around. What language was that interview conducted in? Oh yeah, English. What language is spoken in classrooms in major Universities? What's that? Yep, also English. What do you really want Mr. Nogales? From my perspective as an educator of Hispanic children, I see you doing them and their parents a disservice by making it easy on them to remain in a shadowy "other" realm, LA's second city, where English is rare and education and resources are low. Let's face it. English is the
de facto language of business and academia in this country. There are limits to what you can do if you do not speak it. Period. And the best way to learn English is to be immersed in it, as for any other language.
Props to Ah-Nuld. He's been there and he accomplished something great, therefore he has the right to share the benefit of his experience. But to say (essentially) that his opinion is unwelcome because he didn't have the resources available to Spanish speakers in CA today is ludicrous, and furthermore to call him naive and out of touch because he didn't need crutches to get there is selfish and self-serving.
What is your real goal, Mr. Nogales? To force-feed non-English speakers your bullshit propaganda? To keep your people down so that they will foment a revolution? Or to make this country as Spanish speaking as Mexico. Ironic that, as the Spanish language itself was imposed on Mexico about 500 years ago.....
h/t
Mikey
Posted by: caltechgirl at
10:50 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 547 words, total size 4 kb.
1
Bingo Sam. This first thing I thought when I heard this was it's not like English is Arnold's first language. This man is speaking from experience, not out of his ass.
Not only is English the de facto language of commerce here, but it is internationally as well. My sister does quite a bit of traveling to other countries and the locals always gather around them because they want to test their English. Yet here? Well, you know the answer to that.
And I'd like to point out that CTG speaks Spanish; I'm still learning. There's nothing wrong with having a second language. It's actually most helpful when you live somewhere where your native tongue is not the spoken language. Deh.
Posted by: Stacy at June 16, 2007 01:04 PM (92p8H)
2
CTG, you nailed it! Spanish is NOT the native language of the indigenous people of Mexico - why stick with that - the Conquistadors were far more cruel than the Americans.
Posted by: beth at June 16, 2007 02:05 PM (9FPYz)
3
.... damn, girl..... that was spot on....
Posted by: Eric at June 17, 2007 06:51 PM (XKa04)
4
What Eric said, in spades...
Posted by: Richmond at June 18, 2007 05:07 PM (e8QFP)
5
I think Alex Nogales gets my "WTF? of the Week" award.
I know a few immigrants...and one of the things they told me was that they either LEARNED English or IMPROVED their English by watching English-language television (and speaking with English speakers; one woman I know said, "I like to speak with you because you speak good English and I know my English will get better if I work with you.")
I suspect that a lot of these folks who claim to be speaking for the immigrants just really want to keep the immigrants weak and dependent on THEM to "take care" of them. It's a position of power, a chance to feed at the public trough, and a chance to say nasty things about non-Hispanics.
Posted by: ricki at June 19, 2007 05:02 AM (O5SYw)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
June 08, 2007
Suck it up, twat. a.k.a. Paris goes to jail Part Deux
You play, you pay, little girl.
This is what happens when you drive drunk. You go to jail. PERIOD. Rich and Famous means nothing to Justice. Remember, she's
blind.
Suck it up Paris. Maybe you'll actually learn a lesson from this. You know, that Mommy and Daddy can't cover for you for the rest of your life.
Here's my favorite
part:
As [deputy city attorney, David Bozanich] made the final pitch for Hilton's further incarceration, Hilton's entire body began trembling. She had a ball of tissue clutched in her hand and tears ran down her face.
Seconds later the judge announced his decision.
"The defendant is remanded to county jail to serve the remainder of her 45-day sentence. This order is forthwith," he said.
Hilton screamed.
The courtroom was surrounded with eight deputies who immediately ordered all spectators out.
Hilton's mother Kathy threw her arms around her husband Rick and sobbed uncontrollably.
Deputies escorted Hilton out of the room, holding each of her arms as she looked back.
Go to jail. Go directly to jail. Do not pass Go. Do not collect $200 dollars. Not that you need it.
Posted by: caltechgirl at
01:05 PM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 204 words, total size 2 kb.
1
There
is a God in Heaven!
Posted by: DirtCrashr at June 08, 2007 01:47 PM (VNM5w)
2
First the Ducks win, now this...God, what have I done to deserve so much joy at once?
Posted by: Emily at June 08, 2007 02:46 PM (lXDk3)
Posted by: Mia at June 08, 2007 09:06 PM (8yLzc)
4
Best line I heard about this whole mess (I forget which late-night talk show host said it):
It's the 'RawSkank Redemption'.
Posted by: Mrs. Who at June 09, 2007 06:52 AM (9FXen)
5
Ha! Cosmic comeuppance in it's finest form!!
BTW - I'm late with the mailing of your presents - on the way soon though! :-)
Posted by: Richmond at June 09, 2007 09:08 AM (e8QFP)
6
This is what happens when you drive drunk. You go to jail. PERIOD.
No. Paris got a wet reckless for driving drunk (if you're only a little over the legal limit, and you're not doing anything too crazy, and it's your first time busted for being over the limit, they charge you with reckless driving rather than DUI and it's informally called a "wet reckless")
She was released and her license was suspended. She was then caught driving on her suspended license. Her excuse was that it was no big deal because she was just going to In-N-Out for a quick late-night snack. She may have even been caught twice, I don't remember. That's why she's in jail. Not for driving drunk.
It's pathetic how she casually broke the law multiple times and acted like it was no big deal. It's pathetic how the macho judge has decided to punish Paris more than other people who have been convicted of the same crimes. It's pathetic how Paris got to go home and wax her legs for a day. It's pathetic how the media won't shut up about it. The whole story is pathetic.
Posted by: Daryl Herbert at June 10, 2007 03:03 PM (YvLui)
7
Hi, I found your site via searching for "caltech" on Twitter (TwitDir).
Well, maybe if Paris spends her whole whopping 45 days in jail, she'll have time to think about all the hurt she could have caused by driving drunk.
I read on the news that she reportedly said that going to jail was by far the hardest thing she'd ever done, but I guess she's never been to college or the military! I wonder if she's learning to make her own bed for the first time.
So what are you and your husband doing at Caltech?
Gordon (aeroG on Twitter)
P.S. - I read that "eleventy-one things" post. That's pretty funny. I never realized Einstein was born on 3/14.
Posted by: Gordon at June 10, 2007 06:18 PM (JRN6q)
8
I had to re-read that three times. I started laughing too hard each time to finish. I really don't like Parasite Hilton.
Posted by: Contagion at June 12, 2007 04:12 PM (T4WRc)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
June 06, 2007
Maybe that sign should read "No Blood for Gas" instead?
I got yer "
No Blood for Oil!" right
here:
Red Cross Offering Gas For Blood
Lucky Winner Will Get $3,500 In Gasoline
PHILADELPHIA — American Red Cross officials are offering the chance to win free gasoline as an incentive to get more Pennsylvania and New Jersey residents to donate blood.
This summer, each donor will automatically be entered in a drawing to win $3,500 worth of gasoline. Entries for the first drawing, July 23, are already being accepted. An identical raffle will start July 23 and run through Sept. 16. Every day, the Red Cross also will award a $25 gas card to a randomly selected donor.
Can't you just see the tinfoil hat brigade protesting the Red Cross? I wouldn't put it past them.....
idea
stolen shamelessly from BR
Posted by: caltechgirl at
08:28 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 149 words, total size 1 kb.
1
OMG - that is too funny, CTG!
Posted by: beth at June 07, 2007 04:16 AM (9FPYz)
2
No blood for oil changes!
Posted by: zonker at June 07, 2007 06:09 AM (PrUNH)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
May 31, 2007
A Modern Commandment
Of
Ellison:
"Thou shalt take thy garbage out from thy dwelling-place when the midden-heap becometh full, and deposit it in the Great Big Rolly Thing By The Driveway. Do this, lest thy habitation become stinky: I am the Lawd.
"On the second day and on the fifth day, thou shalt roll the Great Big Rolly Thing to the boundary of thy driveway, even unto the edge of thy driveway, that the Garbage Men may come to remove it from thy dwelling-place.
"And on the first of the month, thou shalt send thy Check-Offering unto the Garbage-Men, that they may continue to do their service, and the Crap in thy Dwelling-Place shall not become as numerous as the stars in the sky. It shall be a commandment unto you from generation to generation."
Amen.
Read the rest of Ellison's thoughts on modern life and it's reliance on waste removal.
Posted by: caltechgirl at
10:27 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 152 words, total size 1 kb.
May 11, 2007
Mentally exhausted. Ready to snap.
See today's
Friday F**k Off for details.
Posted by: caltechgirl at
01:49 PM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 17 words, total size 1 kb.
1
All righty then.
I hope the *sellers* die a slow and excruitiating painful death, immediately after the fix what needs to be repaired and sign all the closing documents. In addition, it is my sincere desire to see those giving you grief at the mortgage company meet the very same fate.
I am now in awe of what is euphemistically referred to as "railing rhetoric."
Bless you.
Posted by: Christina at May 11, 2007 02:51 PM (d3xGU)
2
I'm so sorry. I had no idea things were going that badly. *sigh* Is there anyone I can slap for you?
Posted by: Teresa at May 11, 2007 03:23 PM (gsbs5)
3
OMG, thanks to all those subprime mortgage idiots, I can't afford a house. I live in stupid silicon valley, where people have more house than brains. And then they want everyone to bail them out, just like the people with the 10 million dollar houses and no fire insurance, while those of us who are responsible and know how much house we can afford foot the bill for their recklessness and disregard for the rest of the universe.
Posted by: silvermine at May 11, 2007 03:49 PM (ysfOA)
4
Oh CTG, I'm so sorry. I'm still thinking so many happy thoughts for you.
Posted by: wRitErsbLock at May 11, 2007 04:29 PM (0Pi1o)
5
Silvermine, if you can stand the commute, you can go east like I did.
Posted by: Ken S, Fifth String on the Banjo of Life at May 11, 2007 07:08 PM (Yh9SA)
6
Well, that sucks. I volunteer to hold down whoever you need slapped. Be a pleasure...
Posted by: pam at May 12, 2007 06:16 AM (l6NIn)
7
What a load of crap. I'm so sorry. And it's why I won't move again unless I win the lottery. I don't want to deal with the mortgage lenders again.
Posted by: Mrs. Who at May 13, 2007 08:59 AM (9FXen)
8
Good Lord, Girl - you and I need to meet for drinks when we get our collective fiascos finished. Eh? FIrst three rounds are on me...
Posted by: Richmond at May 14, 2007 12:49 PM (e8QFP)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
May 06, 2007
The Princess is getting a puppy sister! Scratch That
One of the CaltechMom's friend's dogs recently had puppies, and as we've been thinking long and hard about getting a little sibling for the Princess, she offered us one, and we accepted!
The new puppy is a little black standard smooth-coated Dachshund, and CaltechMom will pick her up tomorrow.
The only problem is that we won't get to meet her until after Mom has had her for a couple of weeks. And she needs a name before then!.
This is where you all come in. We're having a hard time giving Puppy-girl a name!
We'd prefer a girly name, two syllables, since that's easiest for the dog to learn, and something suitable to a little black doxie.
Also, it can't rhyme with "Molly" or "Dolly" because the Princess' name already does.
Have at it folks. There may be a prize for the person suggesting the eventual name!
No Dog. She called my mom tonight and said her brother took my dog for himself. The rotten bastard.
Posted by: caltechgirl at
12:02 AM
| Comments (14)
| Add Comment
Post contains 184 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Oh my.
I had my boy about a month before I settled on his name, it took that long to get to know him well enough to name him.
Of course, he has his official name on his papers, but I have never called him by that name and I refuse to tell anyone what it is, its too embarassing.
Pictures! Pictures would help.
Posted by: LindaSoG at May 06, 2007 01:22 AM (GBBmd)
2
I'm so jealous! I had dachshunds when I was growing up and I love them. I like the standard size - the miniatures are just too nervous.
Girl names for a doxie - Gretchen (I had a red long-haired doxie named Gretchen) - Heidi - Hilda - Hannah - Irmgard - Ingrid - Elke.
I think of those, I like Hannah the best.
Posted by: Beth at May 06, 2007 05:00 AM (poSM5)
Posted by: Christina at May 06, 2007 08:51 AM (d3xGU)
4
Raven - because she's black (and it would start a cool new tradition of naming our pets/children for one another).
Vesta - your home already has a princess, how about adding a goddess (Roman goddess of the home).
Or I like Beth's suggestion of Hannah.
Posted by: Janette at May 06, 2007 12:20 PM (5R+zg)
5
Oh and congratulations on the new puppy!
Posted by: Janette at May 06, 2007 12:21 PM (5R+zg)
6
YAY a Dachshund baby!! Congratulations!! I remember when little Button fit in the palm of my hand, tail and all...

I knew a couple of cool dachshunds when I was young named Schotzy and Candy. I would never have named a dog 'candy' but it really fit this girl.
I do love Heidi for a dachshund, of course...
Posted by: pam at May 06, 2007 04:52 PM (l6NIn)
7
Cool! Here are some good "German" names:
http://www.babynameworld.com/german-girl.asp
Congrats!
Posted by: vw bug at May 06, 2007 05:35 PM (FPOeI)
8
Maybe it's a sign?
- Jon
- Daddy Detective
- www.daddydetective.com
Posted by: Jon at May 07, 2007 05:31 AM (Mxs0h)
Posted by: Marie at May 07, 2007 05:58 AM (ocfI9)
10
ps -- you have a lot of good stuff posted here! I have to come back & read/watch it all when I have some time.
Posted by: Marie at May 07, 2007 06:01 AM (ocfI9)
Posted by: Janette at May 07, 2007 07:22 AM (5R+zg)
12
I hope puppy shits all over his rugs. LOLLLLLL
Posted by: Margi at May 07, 2007 11:55 AM (qs4Ot)
13
Sorry to hear that...
Posted by: pam at May 08, 2007 05:17 AM (l6NIn)
Posted by: Richmond at May 08, 2007 09:47 AM (e8QFP)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
April 11, 2007
April 04, 2007
Tuesday TiVo dilemma
The TiVo records 2 things at a time, and we can't watch another channel when it records 2.
Tuesday at 9, however, is a WEALTH of good TV. What's a girl to do?
House
DWS elimination show
Deadliest Catch (it's back! YAY!)
Dog the Bounty Hunter
Thank God the cable companies re-run their primetime shows 3 or 4 hours later. DC and Dog each record at 1am Wednesday, while DWS and House record LIVE...
So I'll be seeing both of them tonight.
I've mentioned before how much I LURVE Deadliest Catch. Don't ask why. I just like watching these guys go out and try to beat Mother Nature and make BANK in 2 weeks. Good for them.
Spring is definitely the BEST TV time. YAY!
Posted by: caltechgirl at
12:50 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 122 words, total size 1 kb.
1
we have so much recorded that we need to watch, including Deadliest Catch. Also four episodes from LAST SEASON of the Shield, which also started back up last night. So now five episodes of that. I'm also now three episodes behind on Friday Night Lights.
I need a nice leisure day to watch hours and hours of tv.
Three more weeks until the end of this semester...
Posted by: wRitErsbLock at April 04, 2007 07:14 PM (0Pi1o)
2
I watch DWS on ABC.com. My Tivo is only hooked up to record/view one show at a time. POS
BTW, House was really good. And I think next week's is going to be great.
Posted by: Sissy at April 04, 2007 07:22 PM (y2kUf)
3
Flap and Mrs. Flap have 3 DVR's and they all are constantly recording.
Now to find the time to watch it all.
Posted by: Flap at April 07, 2007 09:39 PM (JlBYW)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
April 03, 2007
Funny, I thought they'd call it "Doga"
Yoga is a fun, relaxing practice. Sure, it can be challenging, but I find that even a few simple stretches and poses are very good for helping me to relax and focus, especially in the midst of a very stressful task or a rapidly approaching deadline.
One thing that usually DOESN'T help, however, is my beloved Princess. She is drawn like a magnet to mommy on the floor, assuming of course, that the only reason I would be there is to play with her. Frankly, she's WAY more of a hinderance than anything, especially if I am trying to meditate.
So I was highly amused when I found this article today:
In Bryan's class, the humans do traditional yoga poses -- yes, including "downward facing dog" -- while staying in contact physically with their pets.
Part of the class includes gentle stretching and dog massage, another specialty of Bryan's, but most of the time the humans gently use the dogs like yoga props.
In downward facing dog, for example, the humans rest their heads on their companions, who are relaxing -- napping? -- on the mat.
"Don't be too ambitious," she said. "Honor where your dog is and remember that dogs respond to our energy."
Evidently in this class, both man and beast get the benefits of the practice, as the poses are modified to fit the ability of the human "partner" and the size of the dog "partner", which ranges from a toy Poodle to a Visla.
Actually, it sounds like fun. And it's a great fundraiser for the humane society.
Posted by: caltechgirl at
12:07 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 274 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Cool idea. I have the same situation trying to do stretches or floor exercises here, with a little boy in the room! "Surely I'm suppose to climb all over Mommy now!"
Posted by: Marie at April 03, 2007 01:49 PM (ocfI9)
Posted by: wRitErsbLock at April 03, 2007 08:00 PM (0Pi1o)
3
They just had a similar writeup in our paper!!!
Posted by: vw bug at April 04, 2007 01:50 PM (cudDU)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
March 06, 2007
February 22, 2007
February 20, 2007
Removing the Pajamas
Jeff Goldstein has been told in
no uncertain terms that PJM doesn't want him anymore.
Why you ask? Well, frankly, because he lost a lot of traffic when his site was down while he was dealing with that crazy left-wing whore who threatened his child and wife.
The screwing began with Dennis the Peasant and it hasn't stopped. Steve lays it out:
I'm only guessing, but the logical assumption is that the principals are going to get paid no matter what, while the investors and member bloggers who don't prosper in spite of joining PJM get the shaft. You know how this works. You saw The Producers, didn't you?
Michelle Malkin improved her traffic somewhat, no thanks to PJM, so she gets no pay cut. Instapundit's traffic stayed flat in spite of the dullest, laziest, most unnecessary and useless blogging in the top half of the ecosystem, so he gets no pay cut. PJM failed to drive traffic to Jeff, and for one reason or another he didn't generate it on his own, so Jeff takes a beating. Meanwhile, I'm sure he's grateful for all those print opportunities they rounded up for him. I know Raj and Rerun were busy, busy, busy every day, knocking on doors and handing out business cards, securing those MSM ins we heard so much about back before respectable folks like Larry Kudlow bailed out.
The investors get milked, the castle in the sky fails to materialize, Raj and Rerun feather their nests, and a top-notch writer has his valuable time wasted. Is that an incorrect assessment? If Pajamas Media were as transparent as the workings of a Cheney energy-policy session, maybe we would know. It's a good guess, though.
Jeff was distracted, because a vicious lunatic whore threatened his family and had to be dealt with, and maybe that hurt his traffic. But would that have mattered, had PJM been anything but a house of cards? Where is the synergy we used to hear about? Obviously, the PJs didn't pull their own weight, and now they care more about money than they do about Jeff taking time off to protect his wife and son.
Shady underhanded crap.
As I've said before. And you know, crap floats. You can keep flushing it all you want, it just pops up somewhere else.
It'll be a real fucking shame if Goldstein quits because PJM drops his paycheck.
Posted by: caltechgirl at
10:39 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 404 words, total size 3 kb.
February 18, 2007
Calling the Democrats' Bluff
An Open Letter to Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi
Dear Sir and Madam:
You have said often enough that you don't believe in the war in Iraq and that you want to bring the troops home. Yet all you do is talk and sign non-binding resolutions which only goes to show that you really don't mean what you say about ending the war or that you're just playing political games and in doing so giving aid and comfort to a dedicated enemy.
Now if you're serious about ending the war you have the means and the votes to do just that. Simply cut off the funding for the troops, bring them all home and the American people can transfer the deed to this war and the ramifications of what you do to the Democrat party and you can live with the results.
You say you support the troops, but that has to be a lie. If you supported them and you truly think the war is wrong, you'd bring them home or either dispense with the poisonous rhetoric and get in behind them and help them get the job done.
You can't have it both ways. If you support the troops do something. Your party won a majority in both houses, so you have control so take the responsibility.
Of course, I think you should remember that when the terrorists follow us home from Iraq and start their attacks on American soil it's too late, so you'd better have a plan to deal with it. Do you have a plan?
And if Iran goes into Iraq and makes it a staging ground for Al Qaida to plan and carry out attacks all over the western world you'll need to deal with that. Do you have a plan?
And if Iran decides to go into Kuwait and cut off the oil flow from the Persian
Gulf, you'll need a way to make up for the shortfall. Do you have a plan?
The world would look at us as a country that has not finished a commitment to war since 1945. Do you have a plan for dealing with that?
The purpose of this letter is to call your bluff. I don't believe you have the guts to do anything but talk and talk is cheap. Oh you have no shortage of words but I seriously doubt the amount of backbone you have.
Do you really think that signing a non binding resolution is really fooling anybody into thinking you're anything less than career politicians trying to tip the scales of the O08 Presidential Election?
What you're doing is silly and dangerous. If you really don't like what's going on, chang
Pray for our troops.
What do you think?
God Bless America
Charlie Daniels
February 16, 2007
H/T Linda SoG
Posted by: caltechgirl at
04:58 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 476 words, total size 3 kb.
1
Thanks for posting this. I heart CD!
Posted by: Mrs. Who at February 18, 2007 06:34 PM (9FXen)
2
If only they would listen...
Posted by: Richmond at February 20, 2007 06:14 AM (e8QFP)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
February 15, 2007
head shaking...
And it's not because of the ear pain. Ladies and Gentlemen, I give you Moonbattery at its
FINEST:
I knew in that moment that this was what the future of teaching about justice would include: teaching war criminals who sit glaring at me with hatred for daring to speak the truth of their atrocities and who, if paid to, would disappear, torture and kill me. I wondered that night how long I really have in this so called "free" country to teach my students and to be with my children and grandchildren.
The whole thing is insane. This paragraph in particular, is a MASTERPIECE:
These military and mercenary terrorist-students are trained in terrorist training camps all under the USA, funded by American taxpayers. In fact, people under the USA are "sacrificing" their healthcare and their children's educations while donating their tax dollars to these terrorist training camps. These terrorist camps train money hungry working class stiffs to murder, steal and plunder for the power
hungry US corporate war lords.
The author of this quasi intelligible twaddle is June Scorza Terpstra, Professor of Social Justice at Loyola University in Chicago.
Read the
whole thing. No really, I'll wait.
People like this woman give all academics a bad name.The same free speech and social justice that she worships for the poor, the downtrodden, and the
left, she refuses to extend to the very ones who allow to keep those freedoms. The irony drips. How naive do you really have to be to think that what our troops are doing in the Middle East is all about Greed and Power and Neocon ego-stroking???
I have just one question for this
so-called social justice proponent: Which is better, social justice-wise: To live in the US as it is today, with Freedoms of Speech, Press, Religion, etc; where women are free to wear as many or as few clothes as they like, drive, speak their minds (including YOU, lady), and vote; where you can walk about (in the daylight at least) in most cities without fear of imminent death; etc, etc? Or would you like to live under sharia law as it is practiced in much of the Muslim world? Would you like to wear a burqa or hajib, have NO rights under the law, be vulnerable to rape and murder on a whim, be uneducated, and unable to drive, choose your husband (or not), or go anywhere alone? Do you want to live in fear of terrorism or the secret police who come after you just because they don't like you?
These "war criminals" allow you to keep you job, your lifestyle, your right to vote. In case you forgot, 20 of those fuckers came over here and told us in NO UNCERTAIN TERMS 5 years ago that they mean business, and they don't care. If the terrorists out there are willing to sacrifice themselves, their children and old people, and everything they have to end our way of life, then we must be EQUALLY DETERMINED to keep it.
You cannot negotiate with terrorists. You cannot use diplomacy in the face of nuclear weapons. Or even IEDs.
The lesson of Vietnam is NOT that we walked away. The lesson is that walking away leaves chaos in its wake. And we cannot afford to do that this time around.
h/t
Smash
Posted by: caltechgirl at
12:01 PM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 551 words, total size 4 kb.
1
The woman is clearly deranged. Isn't it amazing how in her psychosis, she twists what was said to her to make it sound like they're all over there for that big cash pay out... HOLY CRAP. I have tried to read it twice - yesterday and today. I get sick about half way through and have to stop. It's the most disgusting drivel I've ever seen. That this woman, with this skewed world view, is a professor at a university... would boggle the mind, except that we hear it over and over again.
Posted by: Teresa at February 15, 2007 01:58 PM (gsbs5)
2
Good god. I cannot even fathom how much kool-aid it takes to really believe taht sh*t!
Posted by: Richmond at February 15, 2007 02:00 PM (e8QFP)
Posted by: vw bug at February 15, 2007 03:11 PM (jxQhM)
4
This woman should not ever be allowed near a classroom or a student. Don't they give sanity tests for these people?
Posted by: LindaSoG at February 15, 2007 05:35 PM (GBBmd)
5
Don't they give sanity tests for these people?
Apparently not, considering the wackadoodle who stalked Jeff Goldstein last summer. And let's not forget Ward "Little Eichmanns" Churchill.
Posted by: McGehee at February 16, 2007 07:42 AM (lAOTn)
6
This type of person is more dangerous than the enemy. We can shoot the enemy. But morons like this perfesser are secure in their little first amendment snow forts and are allowed to lob their stupid diatribes at will. I loathe these people and I call them traitors. Traitors.
Posted by: PaleoMedic at February 16, 2007 08:41 AM (xirX/)
7
How can people be so deluded?
Posted by: Mrs. Who at February 16, 2007 05:37 PM (9FXen)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
How can you not love it?
The band name is a hockey penalty, the album name from a conversation with Victor Davis Hanson, the singer is a math nerd.
Five for Fighting, Two Lights
And John Ondrasik is on this week's Glenn and Helen Show.
I've been a big fan of 5fF for a long time, the Puppyblender, not so much, but it's a good interview, and interesting enough to listen to the entire thing.
Here's some Five For Fighting for your Thursday listening pleasure:
First, my favorite one, 100 years
And of course, the song that made the band big, Superman
Posted by: caltechgirl at
10:56 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 108 words, total size 2 kb.
1
How could I know you were a 5fF fan? I saw them at the Bumbershoot Festival a couple of years ago -- fantastic!
Posted by: Kj at February 15, 2007 01:45 PM (gHJSu)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
February 13, 2007
Why am I against the new HPV vaccine?
This is why.
This is the SECOND rotavirus vaccine to cause these problems in young children and infants. In 1999, the Rotashield vaccine caused the same problems.
Until we know FOR SURE that the Gardasil vaccine is safe, it is entirely irresponsible to mandate it for every female child.
Furthermore, Rachel makes a good point here:
"We (the collective) do not want the government to pass laws about our right to murder our unborn children, but we're not up in arms about the government forcing us to inject foreign matter into our little girls' bodies?"
Intellectual Disconnect much?
Posted by: caltechgirl at
06:16 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 112 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I'm opposed to making it mandatory, at least without further study of long term effects, but this statement says much: The agency said the 28 reported cases do not exceed the number that might be expectedNot that it would deter the shysters.
Posted by: Ken S, Fifth String on the Banjo of Life at February 13, 2007 07:13 PM (YElNr)
2
They're touting it as the be all end all of preventing... what is it? Cervical cancer... or something like that in about 30 years if you're one of the few who gets the virus and then has cancer as a consequence.
Once again we have people pushing something to "help the children". This is argument they apply when they want to persuade anyone that they should stop asking questions and just take the damned medicine.
Unfortunately not too many people will question this lest they be thought to be a bigoted right-wing Christian Nazi. To be one of the "cool" parents, you need to just accept this and let them vaccinate.
ARG!!!
Posted by: Teresa at February 13, 2007 10:19 PM (gsbs5)
3
one thing that scares me is that since I'm only the step-mom, if the egg donor decides to use my step-child as a guinea pig, my opinion won't matter.
and my husband seems to be ignoring the topic. he's still trying to cope with his little girl having to wear a bra.
Posted by: wRitErsbLock at February 14, 2007 05:29 AM (+MvHD)
4
In medical cost vs. benefit modeling (which strongly informs national medical public policy making and far too strongly informs the medical policies of HMOs), the most critical component is a value called "cost per life year gained."
If the cost per life year gained is under $50,000, that is generally considered a decent investment by US medical policy makers. If "cost per life year" gained is over $100,000, that is generally considered a wasteful medical policy because that money could surely be put to much better use elsewhere. Yes, this is cruel and heartless to some degree, but wide scale medical cost allocations do need to be made and, more relevantly, are continually made using these cost plus risk vs. benefit analyses. Think HMOs. Now consider why pap smears, blood tests and urine tests aren't recommended every month for everyone. Testing monthly could definitely save more than a few lives, and there is no measurable associated medical risk. But the cost would be astronomical versus the benefit over the entire US population when comparing these monthly tests to other therapies, procedures and medicines.
Now on to GARDASIL. By the time you pay doctors a small fee to inventory and deliver GARDASIL in three doses, you are talking about paying about $500 for this vaccine. And because even in the best case scenario GARDASIL can confer protection against only 70% of cervical cancer cases, GARDASIL cannot ever obsolete the HPV screening test that today is a major component of most US women's annually recommended pap smears. These tests screen for 36 nasty strains of HPV, while GARDASIL confers protection against just four strains of HPV.
Now let's consider GARDASIL's best case scenario at the moment -- about $500 per vaccine, 100% lifetime protection against all four HPV strains (we currently have no evidence for any protection over five years), and no risk of any medical complications for any subset of the population (Merck's GARADSIL studies were too small and short to make this determination for adults, these studies used potentially dangerous alum injections as their "placebo control" and GARDASIL was hardly even tested on little kids). Now, using these best case scenario assumptions for GARDASIL, let's compare the projected situation of a woman who gets a yearly HPV screening test starting at age 18 to a woman who gets a yearly HPV screening test starting at age 18 plus the three GARDASIL injections at age 11 to 12. Even if you include all of the potential medical cost savings from the projected reduction in genital wart and HPV dysplasia removal procedures and expensive cervical cancer procedures, medicines and therapies plus all of the indirect medical costs associated with all these ailments and net all of these savings against GARDASIL's costs, the best case numbers for these analyses come out to well over $200,000 per life year gained -- no matter how far the hopeful pro-GARDASIL assumptions that underpin these projections are tweaked in GARDASIL's favor.
Several studies have been done, and they have been published in several prestigious medical journals:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.290.6.781
http://tinyurl.com/2ovy95
http://tinyurl.com/2tbuma
None of these studies even so much as consider a strategy of GARDASIL plus a regimen of annual HPV screenings starting at age 18 to be worth mentioning (except to note how ridiculously expensive this would be compared to other currently recommended life extending procedures, medicines and therapies) because the cost per life year gained is simply far too high. What these studies instead show is that a regimen of GARDASIL plus delayed (to age 21, 22, 23, 25 or 27) biennial or triennial HPV screening tests may -- depending on what hopeful assumptions about GARDASIL's long term efficacy and risks are used -- hopefully result in a modest cost per life year savings compared to annual HPV screening tests starting at age 18.
If you don't believe me about this, just ask any responsible OB-GYN or medical model expert. Now, why do I think all of this is problematic?
1) Nobody is coming clean (except to the small segment of the US population that understands medical modeling) that the push for widespread mandatory HPV vaccination is based on assuming that we can use the partial protection against cervical cancer that these vaccines hopefully confer for hopefully a long, long time period to back off from recommending annual HPV screening tests starting at age 18 -- in order to save money, not lives.
2) Even in the best case scenario, the net effect is to give billions in tax dollars to Merck so HMOs and PPOs can save billions on HPV screening tests in the future.
3) These studies don't consider any potential costs associated with any potential GARDASIL risks. Even the slightest direct or indirect medical costs associated with any potential GARDASIL risks increase the cost per life year gained TREMENDOUSLY and can even easily change the entire analysis to cost per life year lost. Remember that unlike most medicines and therapies, vaccines are administered to a huge number of otherwise healthy people -- and, at least in this case, 99.99% of whom would never contract cervical cancer even without its protection.
4) These studies don't take in account the fact that better and more regular HPV screening tests have reduced the US cervical cancer rate by about 25% a decade over the last three decades and that there is no reason to believe that this trend would not continue in the future, especially if we used a small portion of the money we are planning on spending on GARDASIL to offer annual HPV screening tests for all low income uninsured US women.
5) The studies assume that any constant cervical cancer death rate (rather than the downward trending cervical cancer death rate we have today) that results in a reduced cost per life year gained equates to sound medical public policy.
As I said before, if any of you don't believe me about this, please simply ask your OB-GYN how the $500 cost of GARDASIL can be justified on a cost per life year gained basis if we don't delay the onset of HPV screening tests and back off from annual HPV screening tests to biennial or triennial HPV screening tests.
The recommendations are already in: http://tinyurl.com/33p9q6
The USPSTF strongly recommends ... beginning screening within 3 years of onset of sexual activity or age 21 (whichever comes first) and screening at least every 3 years ...
Posted by: mhatrw at February 15, 2007 12:57 PM (O39pn)
5
Replica Cartier watches
Cartier is one of the most prestigious brands. Cartier watches became the best seller watch in 2008 and they are very welcomed
by celebrities. Cartier replicas, round, square, rectangular, equipped with mechanical, automatic or quartz movements, all
feature the matchless combination of aesthetics and technical progress. Join in Cartier replica watches, you will find it so
amazing.
Posted by: anthony at April 24, 2009 12:13 AM (pbQca)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 29, 2007
PETA Trial update
Words can not express my sadness and anger at this moment.
The trial of two PETA employees charged with a variety of crimes related to the killing and dumping of nearly 100 animals in Chowan County NC over the last couple of years continues with some disturbing testimony.
The text of a log book used to document the kills is below the fold. It is not graphic, but it is terribly sad. Text is quoted verbatim from PETAKillsAnimals.com
Keep up with the trial here.
more...
Posted by: caltechgirl at
05:39 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 217 words, total size 1 kb.
1
My God! I had no idea those PETA freaks were that crazy.
Posted by: V5 at January 29, 2007 07:42 PM (bP+3v)
2
Unbelieveable!! I'm not a 'PETA freak' but I do believe in humane treatment of any animal! (Kids included most of the time! *L*)
Posted by: Michele at January 30, 2007 05:45 AM (DqxwU)
3
Most of the PETA that I have run into are nuts. I have seen them block boat ramps to try to keep people from fishing..and I have also seen some take a swim when they were thrown off the dock by a bearded redneck whose name I will not mention to protect myself.
Posted by: GUYK at January 30, 2007 06:12 AM (pbl9X)
4
I remember waaaaaay back in the Dark Times -- this was before we had microwave ovens or digital watches or CDs or cell phones or the number '5', when I was in college, the Petans were a new organization, and they were already recruiting on campus using pictures of sobbing puppies. I sent them $20 as a po' dumb college student. I'd like it back now. With interest.
Posted by: dogette at January 31, 2007 04:58 AM (wN2Jx)
5
They're animals. Who cares?
Posted by: Thomas Warlock at January 31, 2007 06:31 PM (pFV/N)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 26, 2007
This could really be painful if it hit you....
Found by my buddy
JustMe in a court docket:
(NAME OF DEFENDANT) Charged with assault and hate crimes for assaulting two women who he believed were lesbians. Accused of hurling anti-gay epitaphs.
I mean, aren't those things usually enscribed on marble or granite??????
Posted by: caltechgirl at
01:01 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 59 words, total size 1 kb.
1
HA! He must have been one strong idiot.
Posted by: Janette at January 26, 2007 01:06 PM (hkz5l)
2
... people are just so mean sometimes......
Posted by: Eric at January 28, 2007 06:21 PM (NlzwQ)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
92kb generated in CPU 0.0232, elapsed 0.0765 seconds.
88 queries taking 0.0624 seconds, 291 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.