July 31, 2007
Fred on Kelo
Yep. Preach it, Senator:
Our Founders placed respect for private property as a key principle when writing our nation's Constitution, and the protection of private property resulted in the United States becoming the greatest economic power in the world and a beacon of freedom to all. This principle is even more important today, as homeownership has become an increasingly integral part of our citizens' aspirations for a better future for themselves and their loved ones. If the Supreme Court will not protect our right to ownership, then political leaders must step up to the challenge.
There's plenty more. See it
here.
Posted by: caltechgirl at
09:58 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 105 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Dear Caltech Gal, would love to have you on board!
I'd like to invite you to support Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin's candidacy for Vice-President on the Republican Ticket. Sarah is an absolutely remarkable elected official, the nation's most popular state official.
I urge you to read Fred's laudatory piece about Sarah in The Weekly Standard, available by clicking on the following link: The Most Popular Governor
He says the following:
"The wipeout in the 2006 election left Republicans in such a state of dejection that they've overlooked the one shining victory in which a Republican star was born. The triumph came in Alaska where Sarah Palin, a politician of eye-popping integrity, was elected governor. She is now the most popular governor in America, with an approval rating in the 90s, and probably the most popular public official in any state.
Her rise is a great (and rare) story of how adherence to principle-especially to transparency and accountability in government-can produce political success. And by the way, Palin is a conservative who only last month vetoed 13 percent of the state's proposed budget for capital projects. The cuts, the Anchorage Daily News said, "may be the biggest single-year line-item veto total in state history."
Here's what I recently wrote about Sarah on my blog: Campaign2008VictoryA (reachable at http://camp2008victorya.blogspot.com/
"If the Democrats had a Sarah Palin -- which they don't -- she'd be up on stage battling it out with Hillary, Barack, and John. When the Democrats have someone who's highly electable, they put him or her out there in front of the nation -- as they did at the convention with Obama. We Republicans have a lot to learn when it comes to highlighting candidates like Sarah (and Michael Steele and J. C. Watts)."
The mother of four, Sarah is ardently pro-life.
Frankly, if we Republicans are to win in 2008, we have to present candidates -- plural -- who are appealing, dynamic, and diverse. Right now, we're way behind in fundraising and marginally behind in national polls. We won't overcome these deficits by pursuing "business as usual." We need to put our very best people forward.
If you want to learn more about Sarah -- or, to join the number of bloggers and others who support her candidacy for V-P-- please let me know either by e-mail (TalkTop65@aol.com) or by leaving a comment on my site.
Today at that site I've had many visitors from the U.S., but also people from the UK, Denmark, the French Alps, Italy, and Turkey. I guess our movement is becoming worldwide.
Thanks for your interest!
Stephen R. Maloney
Ambridge, PA
National Coordinator, Palin for V-P
P.S. You can learn more about Sarah by visiting my site and, if you wish, by clicking on any of the many links to articles and supporters at Campaign2008VictoryA
In addition to the Barnes piece, other recent articles about Sarah by important conservatives include Dimitri Vassilaros' Palin is GOP's beacon - Pittsburgh Tribune-Review and Tom Koenniger's piece at: http://palintology.com/.
Posted by: Stephen Maloney at July 31, 2007 04:02 PM (7MeZM)
2
Run, Fred, Run!
Posted by: pam at July 31, 2007 04:17 PM (l6NIn)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
July 13, 2007
Charlotte Mayor won't apologize for telling the truth
Pat McCrory, Mayor of Charlotte NC
tells it like it is:
The NAACP wants Charlotte Mayor Pat McCrory to apologize for remarks he made about African American youth after last week's arrests during Fourth of July festivities in uptown.
Ken White, president of the Charlotte Branch of the NAACP, on Wednesday called the mayor's comments "insensitive" and said he's concerned they painted "African American youth with a broad swath that cuts deep in many of our communities."
McCrory's comments came July 5 in a letter to the city manager congratulating police on their efforts the night before, when 169 people were arrested in uptown. McCrory also wrote that "too many of our youth, primarily African American, are imitating and/or participating in a gangster type of dress, attitude, behavior and action."
Later Wednesday, McCrory said he won't apologize.
Why not?
"Because my comments were accurate. Period."
Mayor McCrory's comments, as discussed above, were in regards to many arrests at the city's 4th of July celebration. From the
Charlotte Observer:
The uptown crowd was primarily African American, as were most of those arrested: Of 143 adults arrested, 122 were black. Police later noted that those arrested comprised fewer than 1 percent of the uptown revelers.
Mayor McCrory went on to explain both his statements, and why he refuses to apologize:
McCrory ... cited statistics showing more than 60 percent of Charlotte's gang members are African American. And, he said, the victims of gang violence also tend to be black.
"One thing we agree on is that it is a horrible stereotype," McCrory said, "but it's being perpetuated by those who continue to dress like, behave like and act like gang members. It's not productive to our community, our neighborhoods, our schools, or to those individuals who are doing it."
Kudos for Mayor McCrory for saying the truth, and refusing to back down from it. Too often in this society our leaders back down from a stand because powerful opposition groups (in this case the NAACP) start threatening them.
But I must echo LaShawn Barber and ask: When did it become more of a crime in this country to SAY that something is wrong, than to do the wrong thing?
LaShawn goes on:
Too many black “youth” eschew education and decent living, while embracing a lifestyle that glorifies criminal activity, triflingness (yes, there’s such a word), and having illicit and zero-responsibility sex with as many women as possible. The resultant children are sentenced to fatherless homes and instability. That, too, makes me sick to my stomach.
...
Blacks cannot complain about what white people may or may not be doing to them when they don’t even care about their own children. I’ve lost patience with it, and I advise everybody — no matter what color you are — to stop being afraid of the truth or of black people making demands. Take it from an insider: the bark, as loud and annoying as it is, is much worse than the bite.
It's my hope that more of our leaders, of ALL colors, stand up and ask the tough questions and give the tough answers about what's wrong in our communities, following Pat McCrory's example.
Posted by: caltechgirl at
04:49 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 540 words, total size 4 kb.
1
Hey, if it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, it's gotta be a duck, right?
Posted by: Michele at July 14, 2007 10:47 AM (EVoot)
2
Thanks for the post...if you blame all your problems on someone else but don't DO anything FOR yourself, you'll have exactly nothing. (LaShawn Barber is one amazing woman!)
Posted by: Mrs. Who at July 15, 2007 10:47 AM (9FXen)
3
No doubt that there is still a lot of prejudice in the USA..and throughout the world. But denying the short comings of a particular race or creed is not gonna solve a damn thing. When was the last time you heard about the white race defending white trash just because they were white?
Posted by: GUYK at July 15, 2007 01:07 PM (B1gUP)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
July 11, 2007
Moonbattery, Hypocrisy, Idiocy: Three of a kind
The "crack young staff" of the Hatemonger's Quarterly is
on to something:
It's funny how people who claim to care so much about the Bush administration's supposed assault on the proper functioning of our representative democracy seem to care so little about ensuring the proper functioning of our representative democracy.
Reading this, I was reminded of a day, back in 2004, just before President Bush was reelected. It was summer, probably August or September, after the national conventions. The time when the partisanship really started to get out of hand, and bitter.
My own office was on the 7th floor, and it just so happened that there was a lovely, big Wendy's on the second floor. Every day around 11:30 I would head down in the elevator to beat the crowd for my grilled chicken sandwich, baked potato (no sour cream, but lots of chives please!), and Diet Coke.
On the day in question I entered the restaurant to find a girl in line in front of me wearing a white doctor's coat tied about her waist, green scrub pants, and a t-shirt emblazoned with "Fuck the Electoral College".
I was so disgusted, I lost my appetite and went back up to my office. Honestly, the bit that bothered me the LEAST was the fact that she was clearly an intern or resident, and she thought it was proper to dress like that in front of patients. I mean., she probably wore her coat buttoned.... What chapped my ass was the 100% ignorance of what the Electoral College is all about, and why we have it in the first place. That she would proclaim publicly (in effect) "our system is broken because the wrong guy won, so let's trash it and keep changing it until the right guy wins."
But getting back to the HMQ piece, which is about the "Impeach Bush" movement. Answer me this: What kind of "high crimes and misdemeanors" is he guilty of? What laws did he break?
I can't hear you. Maybe because you can't answer.
The truth is that the Moonbat brigade are vindictive bitter losers who CAN NOT accept the fact that (1) the majority of Americans disagree with them and (2) Their poster boy was impeached for cause. He lied to Federal investigators.
It's clear to me that this impeachment nonsense is no more than a tired game of tit-for-tat. You impeached our boy, we'll impeach yours. Except it isn't anywhere NEAR that simple. You can't impeach someone because you think he's stupid or you disagree with him or (OMG!) he's a Christian. (Which BTW, Bill Clinton claims to be too!). He has to commit a crime, which Clinton did, and Bush has not.
h/t Phoenix
Posted by: caltechgirl at
10:57 AM
| Comments (10)
| Add Comment
Post contains 466 words, total size 3 kb.
1
Absolutely! It is so much a tit-for-tat thing. People like your t-shirt wearing gal drive me bonkers too for the same reasons I imagine. They don't understand the history and are unclear on the concept.
I would posit that the Electoral College is even more important today because we are now entering, in my opinion, the age of the Super-Cities. Cities that have expanded into far-spreading suburbs, where the large majority of the population all resides.
It should never be possible for the electorate of 5 or 6 states to determine our highest office. The little people in flyover country matter too, even if some of do shop at Walmart and Target. But, many don't see it that way.
And, frankly, people who are constantly calling for impeachment look like fools because impeachment is only the first step. You still have to have a trial and find the official guilty. Another pesky detail, I know.
What I'd like to know is, what do they think they gain by impeaching Bush? That just makes Cheney President (if they succeed).
Furthermore, have you seen the tshirt that Cindy Sheehan is wearing lately? "Arrest Cheney First". What the heck is that supposed to mean?
I guess I'm just an ignorant neocon witch/redneck living in flyover country, because I can't figure out what he's supposed to be arrested for...
Sorry for the long comment...
Posted by: Phoenix at July 11, 2007 11:25 AM (4N2f4)
2
psst. I need your e-mail
Posted by: armywifetoddlermom at July 11, 2007 12:54 PM (PjrBf)
3
Excellent post! I've never understood liberals turning bitterly hateful and wanting to throw everything out because they can't control it...
It's just an odd state of mind.
Posted by: pam at July 11, 2007 06:40 PM (l6NIn)
4
CalTechGirl,
You appear confused.
What about my post
a) Gave the impression I did not read the Babalu website?
b) And where do I give the impression I agree with Cuba in any way?
Please be specific
Posted by: FightClub™ at July 12, 2007 09:23 AM (1SN4m)
5
1) You implied that someone on Babalu was praising the castro regime
2) I never implied that you supported the regime. In fact, I suggested you share your stories.
Posted by: caltechgirl at July 12, 2007 09:31 AM (qPLLC)
6
The electoral college thing drives me crazy!
Posted by: Jay at July 12, 2007 09:33 AM (WszIH)
7
When a person goes off half-cocked as you just did, it give us conservatives a bad rap.
Let me educate you on where you went wrong.
"There is an eMail I recently received from a friend. It contained a link to the Babalublog about someone who was waxing philosophic about the greatness that is the worker's paradise known as Cuba. I had something to say right away, but I held off for a few dasy in order to take care of some other things, and get a few minutes set aside to write about Cuba."
What other people understood quite clearly, as this "someone" was a TROLL on that website, and was ARGUING with the good people at Babalublog.
Maybe you just had too much caffeine today, or you just like slapping innocent people around because you feel superior?
Tell you what, in case you still "think" you know more than I do about Cuba, or you think you still know more about the "intent" or "moral" of my story, or God forbid, my intentions than I do...
Take a moment and following this link.
So, tell me, you still think I was trying to say that the people at Babalublog are Pro-Cuba, or did your brain short circuit?
Posted by: FightClub™ at July 12, 2007 10:28 AM (1SN4m)
8
Thanks for clarifying your position, I'm glad you really aren't saying terrible things about my friends and, again, I invite you to share your firsthand experiences with the crew at Babalu.
As for half-cocked and short-circuited, I'd say there's more than enough of that to go around.
Posted by: caltechgirl at July 12, 2007 11:02 AM (qPLLC)
9
Perhaps it's because I've been done with the Bushies for about five years now, but there are plenty of examples of possible high crimes and misdemeanors, I think...
As a couple examples - authorization to commit torture (violations of the US Code and several treaties that we are parties to - and treaties made pursuant to the Constitution are "the Supreme law of the land); use of signing statements to circumvent the intent of Congress (questionable, but could work); unilateral, unconstitutional suspension of habeas corpus (only Congress can suspend habeas corpus and only in certain circumstances); one could also probably make an argument for war crimes...
I'm not saying that he should be impeached, but I do think there is as good a case against Bush as there was against Clinton.
And before you ask, no, I haven't gone soft in the head or all liberal. I just call it as I see it.
As far as the Electoral College anecdote, I find the greatest failure of our education system to be the complete lack of education in civics/government. I remember having to explain simple points of our constitutional system to people in law school.
Posted by: KG at July 14, 2007 11:20 AM (8yP1K)
10
Confront such ignorance. Don't lose your appetite and go back up to your office. It's up to people like us to confront these people. Don't let these idiots win simply as a result of our sense of disgust.
Posted by: zonker at July 21, 2007 12:06 AM (PrUNH)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
July 04, 2007
Who knew?
A Prius can do
100 MPH!
The 24-year-old son of former Vice President Al Gore was arrested for drug possession on Wednesday after he was stopped for allegedly speeding in his hybrid Toyota Prius, a sheriff's official said.
Al Gore III -- whose father is a leading advocate of policies to fight global warming -- was driving his environmentally friendly car at about 100 miles per hour on a freeway south of Los Angeles when he was pulled over by an Orange County sheriff's deputy at about 2:15 a.m..
A subsequent search yielded a small amount of marijuana, along with prescription drugs including Valium, Xanax, Vicodin and Adderall, said sheriff's spokesman Jim Amormino. There were no prescriptions found, he said.
Gore was arrested on suspicion of drug possession and booked into the Inmate Reception Center in Santa Ana, about 34 miles south of Los Angeles, on $20,000 bail, he said.
Well, that answers a burning question of mine.... I was wondering if the Prius had any guts. Turns out that it might not be worthless as a vehicle, after all,
As for algore, junior, MWAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA. Moron.
h/t
Steve-O
Posted by: caltechgirl at
12:57 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 185 words, total size 1 kb.
1
LMAO! My husband says next he'll be driving that Prius into a river, where someone will drown...
Posted by: Marie at July 04, 2007 03:01 PM (ocfI9)
2
He probably would have gotten away if only the battery didn't run out. LOL!
Posted by: Kaos at July 04, 2007 03:48 PM (fwmWr)
3
I wonder what he's looking at. Marijuana's generally just a misdemeanor, but at least in Florida, possession of any amount of those controlled substances, especially alprazolam (Xanax) without a prescription is a felony, and I imagine California's statutes are similar.
Posted by: Dave J at July 04, 2007 05:32 PM (PEbS4)
4
I actually feel sorry for the punk, "Al Gore's Kid" - I mean just look at it, he never had a chance... And a Priapus at 100, how many minutes did it take to get up to that speed? How tedious. If you want to go fast do it on two wheels, a Yamaha or Suzuki or Ducati is
fast - a Prius is just another way of faking-out reality.
Posted by: DirtCrashr at July 05, 2007 02:02 PM (VNM5w)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
July 02, 2007
Fred Thompson "gets" the new media
If the left tries to push the "Fairness Doctrine" down people's throats,
the market will simply migrate to new media: Podcasts, web radio, and the like.
We've been hearing threats to use the obsolete Fairness Doctrine to go after talk radio ever since the left-leaning talk radio network, Air America, failed. Ironically, I think Air America might have had a shot if its target audience hadn't already been served so well by many in the mainstream media. But regardless, giving the government veto power over radio stations' programming decisions is wrong. I don't think forcing the one sector of the media where conservatives have a clear voice to provide equal time to liberals is the American way. At the very least, it has a chilling effect on station owners.
I understand how the left feels though. For most of my life, the big broadcast television networks and almost all the major newspapers and magazines presented only one side of a lot of issues. Talk radio is a relatively small part of a bigger media picture, but I imagine it aggravates the new congressional majority to hear their opposition's arguments without the old filters.
I would remind them, though, that a few Republicans were elected even when the entire mainstream media was painting us as heartless Neanderthals. I would also remind the current congressional leadership that they managed to win the last election despite talk radio.
Americans are smart enough to recognize news that's biased -- even when journalists pretend they're not. New polls show that more than seven in 10 people recognize that the news comes with an agenda. So maybe we should welcome a new Fairness Doctrine. We could start by requiring that every broadcast television news show be co-anchored by both a liberal and conservative; and all major newspaper staff be evenly divided.
Not much chance of that happening. Nor should it in a free country -- but I'll tell you something that those who want to control the media apparently don't know. Everyday, more people are listening to streaming radio on the Web and downloading podcasts. Some popular talk shows skip radio altogether and go straight to the Internet. You can even hear talk shows on Web-enabled telephones if you want, and that will get much easier and cheaper quickly.
If the current stars of talk were pushed off the radio dial, they'd get their audiences anyway. The era of controllable media is over, and nothing will ever bring it back.
I agree 100%. A free media is NOT controlled by anything but the market. And the market will seek out whatever outlets it can for the exchange of ideas. Including the web. And Fred gets it. Which, I suspect, is why Fred is the ONLY major candidate doing any of the blogging himself.
Posted by: caltechgirl at
04:31 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 477 words, total size 3 kb.
43kb generated in CPU 0.0165, elapsed 0.0664 seconds.
74 queries taking 0.0568 seconds, 196 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.