April 24, 2007


Armenian villages were rousted one by one, and the men ordered to leave at once and serve the turkish army. Boys as young as 9 or 10, and men as old as 70. Many never made that far, as turkish soldiers often took these "new recruits" not to the army camps but out to the woods, where they were summarily executed. The women and girls, thus undefended, were easy prey for the turkish soldiers.
Those who remained behind were forced from their lands, homes, and belongings, and force-marched to "settlement camps" in remote areas. Many died along the way from exhaustion, starvation, and exposure to the elements. According to French scholars Joel Kotek and Pierre Rigoulot, there were up to 25 such camps.
But the Armenian's plight was nowhere near as unknown, even in that day, as it is now. Despite the lack of internet, video cameras, and TV screens, in 1915 the plight of the Armenians was a worldwide topic of discussion. US Consular officials, as early as July of 1915, were concerned enough to beg the US government to step in.
No less than Winston Churchill, then Britain's First Lord of the Admiralty noted, "the clearance of race from Asia Minor was about as complete as such an act could be...There is no reason to doubt that that this crime was planned and executed for political reasons. The opportunity presented itself for clearing Turkish soil of a Christian race opposed to all Turkish ambitions." And he was then in the midst of the "war to end all wars" against Germany!
During 1915, the New York Times paper published 145 articles about the mass murder of the Armenian people, describing the massacre as "systematic, "authorized" and "organized by the government." In 1918, Theodore Roosevelt called it "the greatest crime of the war."
But today, no one even knows it happened
Denialists of all stripes, from US and EU officials who find turkey's past "annoying", to the turks themselves who believe such raids were justified to "pick up deserters" (yeah, little old men, deserters. right.) have managed to decrease the general public's awareness of these atrocities. But they happened. There was no Photoshop in 1915. All of the horrible pictures you see here are real.
Despite missions from the US and UK, Austria, France, and others, the plight of the Armenians faded off the radar screen as war in Europe intensified.
Looks a lot like Germany around 1942, huh?
In fact, Adolf Hitler said of the Armenian Genocide: "Who, after all, speaks today of the annihilation of the Armenians?"as his justification for the atrocities carried out on the Jews and others during the Nazi's reign over Germany.
We did not forget. We do not forget. We will always remember.
My previous remembrances here. This stays on top all day.
Posted by: caltechgirl at
09:50 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 504 words, total size 5 kb.
April 22, 2007
Tell that to my grandparents. Tell that to my Dad's stepmother, who saved her seven children by WALKING from the mountains of Turkey all the way to Beirut, dressed as an Arab widow. WALKING. With seven children. Hundreds of miles on dirt roads with no shoes, cutting across country to avoid the soldiers. Stopping and doing sewing jobs for money whenever they could.
You pigs say that 4 million Turks died? Could that be because you're counting the Armenians born in Turkey?
Whole villages, rousted from their beds in the middle of the night. All of the men and boys made to line up in the town square, and then SHOT one by one. The women and girls raped by turkish soldiers. The survivors starved to death slowly.
I'll have more on this on April 24, Armenian Martyr's day. Until then I leave you with the words Adolf Hitler used to justify the holocaust:
"Who, after all, speaks today of the annihilation of the Armenians?"h/t Kyle
Posted by: caltechgirl at
11:48 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 171 words, total size 1 kb.
April 17, 2007
Suppose that every day, ten men go out for beer and the bill for all
ten comes to $100. If they paid their bill the way we pay our taxes, it
would go something like this:
The first four men (the poorest) would pay nothing.
The fifth would pay $1.
The sixth would pay $3.
The seventh would pay $7.
The eighth would pay $12.
The ninth would pay $18.
The tenth man (the richest) would pay $59.
So, that's what they decided to do.
The ten men drank in the bar every day and seemed quite happy with
the arrangement, until on day, the owner threw them a curve. "Since you
are all such good customers," he said, "I'm going to reduce the cost of
your daily beer by $20."Drinks for the ten now cost just $80.
The group still wanted to pay their bill the way we pay our taxes so
the first four men were unaffected. They would still drink for free.
But what about the other six men --- the paying customers? How could
they divide the $20 windfall so that everyone would get his 'fair
share?' They realized that $20 divided by six is $3.33. But if they
subtracted that from everybody's share, then the fifth man and the
sixth man would each end up being paid to drink his beer.So, the bar
owner suggested that it would be fair to reduce each man's bill by
roughly the same amount, and he proceeded to work out the amounts each
should pay. And so:
The fifth man, like the first four, now paid nothing (100% savings).
The sixth now paid $2 instead of $3 (33%savings).
The seventh now pay $5 instead of $7 (28%savings).
The eighth now paid $9 instead of $12 (25% savings).
The ninth now paid $14 instead of $18 (22% savings).
The tenth now paid $49 instead of $59 (16% savings).
Each of the six was better off than before. And the first four
continued to drink for free. But once outside the restaurant, the men
began to compare their savings. "I only got a dollar out of the
$20,"declared the sixth man. He pointed to the tenth man," but he got
$10!"
"Yeah, that's right," exclaimed the fifth man. "I only saved a dollar, too.
It's unfair that he got ten times more than I!"
"That's true!!" shouted the seventh man. "Why should he get $10 back when I got only two? The wealthy get all the breaks!"
"Wait a minute," yelled the first four men in unison. "We didn't get anything at all. The system exploits the poor!"
The nine men surrounded the tenth and beat him up. The next night
the tenth man didn't show up for drinks, so the nine sat down and had
beers without him. But when it came time to pay the bill, they
discovered something important. They didn't have enough money between
all of them for even half of the bill!
And that, boys and girls, journalists and college professors, is how
our tax system works. The people who pay the highest taxes get the most
benefit from a tax reduction. Tax them too much, attack them for being
wealthy, and they just may not show up anymore. In fact, they might
start drinking overseas where the atmosphere is somewhat friendlier.
For those who understand, no explanation is needed. For those who do not understand, no explanation is possible.
Posted by: caltechgirl at
05:15 PM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 582 words, total size 3 kb.
73 queries taking 0.0901 seconds, 187 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.












