August 11, 2006
All work and no play....
... makes this girl boring as hell.
We're off to
La Playa for a couple of days of sun and sand.
Be good while I'm gone, and play nice!
Posted by: caltechgirl at
02:23 PM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 37 words, total size 1 kb.
1
AWESOME!!
Have a fab time!!
; )
Posted by: Christina at August 11, 2006 03:22 PM (NUhQR)
2
Don't forget the sunblock! =)
Posted by: Amanda at August 12, 2006 07:19 AM (p2Ch3)
3
Oooh yippee! I hope you had a great time!
Posted by: Janette at August 12, 2006 01:30 PM (OcgcA)
4
I don't wanna be good!
have fun, chica!
Posted by: wRitErsbLock at August 13, 2006 04:51 PM (0Pi1o)
5
Pictures please - and not photoshopped ones!
Posted by: Greta (Hooah Wife) at August 13, 2006 08:21 PM (Cbtbf)
6
Pictures would be awesome! Have a great time!!
Posted by: Dana at August 14, 2006 11:34 AM (uXuyq)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
August 10, 2006
Goodbye Mr. Agony of defeat!
ABC's Wide World of Sports is about to be
no more:
"ESPN will become the overarching brand for all sports programming carried on the ABC Television Network beginning Saturday, Sept. 2 -- the debut of ABC's college football season. "We're using the word evolutionary," said George Bodenheimer, President, ESPN, Inc. and ABC Sports and Co-Chairman, Disney Media Networks. "We're trying to move the ball forward in sports television and we think this is another step in that direction." "
They quit showing the
iconic opening featuring the signature line "The Thrill of Victory and the Agony of Defeat" years ago, but it's still sad to think that we'll never see
Vinko Bogataj crash again.
Posted by: caltechgirl at
03:24 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 122 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Yeah, "ESPN will become the overarching brand for all sports"......
Right.
Flip on ESPN right now and there's a darned good chance you'll see that exciting sport, POKER. Duh!
Posted by: Pee Wee at August 11, 2006 06:19 AM (VPW/H)
2
I think we will see that clip again. It is part of the sports fabric, particularly the non-major sports fabric.
Posted by: Rob at August 11, 2006 12:45 PM (7JqtC)
3
I'm actually old enough to remember that ESPN stands for "Entertainment and Sports Programming Network." Poker is at least entertaining. Then again, so is hockey, and it's an actual sport.
The thing that annoys me most about ESPN since they went cultural phenom on us is that they tend to be too full of themselves rather than of sports and entertainment.
And they can't ever take Wide World of Sports away from us. We used to pretend to BE Vinko! "Hey, Ma - look!"
[dives down stairs] "The Agony of Defeat!"
Posted by: Nightfly at August 11, 2006 01:02 PM (PuuC1)
4
ESPN 8: The Ocho! If it's almost a sport, we cover it! ;-)
Posted by: Dave J at August 14, 2006 07:07 PM (SKqxt)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
I am SO done with Michelle Malkin
She called out one of my friends today. Called her a "sad moonbat" without even reading her post because like we have
all been doing, she lamented the new airline restrictions in the UK and the need for them.
Some of you know Helen, and you know she is neither sad nor a moonbat. She may be a self-described "crunchy granola vegetarian", but if anything, my dear friend is almost entirely apolitical.
I too am appalled by the idea that I would have to trust my cellphone, ipod, and laptop to the honesty of baggage handlers; that my nieces and nephew wouldn't be allowed crayons or snacks on a long, boring flight; that I can have my contact lenses, but not the solution I need to put them in my eyeballs; that racial profiling is a cheap shortcut in the battle against terror.
That Malkin calls such honest sadness "whining" and "moonbattery" is beyond me.
I think we should ALL be sad. I think it should strengthen our resolve to tear these motherfuckers a new asshole. I think it should make us more focused on using ALL the resources we can to identify the dickwads who would do this and find out what they intend before they do it.
Posted by: caltechgirl at
12:20 PM
| Comments (11)
| Add Comment
Post contains 223 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Malkin's entering Coulter territory, I've stopped reading her regularly (or with anything other than a grain of salt).
Name calling, while fun, really has no place in politics.
At some point, I'm thinking someone is going to have to have a Sister Solja (sp?) moment with the likes of Malkin/Coulter.
Posted by: KG at August 10, 2006 12:48 PM (m/1e2)
2
Malkin's worse than Coulter. Coulter uses nastier invective, but only after researching her targets carefully to make sure they really did do whatever it is she's attacking them for doing. Malkin shoots in the dark.
Posted by: Xrlq at August 10, 2006 01:00 PM (pvbzO)
3
I read Helen's entry, and later Malkin's, and think she's so totally wrong for insulting Helen like that. I don't agree with all these restrictions, because that's exactly what the terrorists want for us, to live in fear. My only concern is that my DH looks Arab, even though he is Cuban/French, so I sadly expect a lot of profiling in our future...
Posted by: Amanda at August 10, 2006 04:01 PM (EAn57)
Posted by: Jay at August 11, 2006 06:03 AM (/wOg3)
5
Some of us were done with her long ago, and done with the whole blogospheric plague of lockstepism.
Posted by: Jay at August 11, 2006 06:04 AM (/wOg3)
6
The test was because last night it wouldn't allow me to comment, so I saved it and was going to put it in a post if necessary. Yay for it working now!
Posted by: Jay at August 11, 2006 06:05 AM (/wOg3)
7
What's wrong with a little whining now and then?
Some never started with Michelle.
Posted by: aaron at August 12, 2006 05:55 AM (8dJDM)
8
I'm with both you and Helen.
WHen I do travel I have enough Radio Frequency gear, electronic sweep devices and other assorted items for my job that I almost
always end up being poked, prodded, searched, and 98% of the time questioned as to what I'm doing when i get somewhere.
I'm positively dreading even the thought of taking on a project over-sea's after this little shindig. I'll make it a requirement to travel by boat. Even if its a damn freighter.
Posted by: BloodSpite at August 12, 2006 06:59 PM (i81Vx)
9
I ran into this attitude the other day.
I commented to someone: "I think I'm done with flying. I'm not worried about being blown up, but I am sick of taking my shoes off, being patted down, etc. And now - when on flights to and from Britain, they won't allow books, at least for now. I can't fly if I can't have something to read while I'm stuck in an aluminum tube for hours upon end. And don't get me started on the no-water rule."
and he pulled the "oooh, then the terrorists win" card. NO. I have chosen not to fly because I am scared but because I am FED UP. There IS a difference.
He also pulled the, "oh, you're just whining" card. Okay then. Say we decide to try to make them "stop hating" us. And part of that requires me to wear a burqa to work. Is my refusing to do that "whining"?
I think there's a point where we have to say, our quality-of-life is worth something. It's okay to be mad as hell because some of the little comforts of life are being taken away and new discomforts added.
I hope for a day when the Islamofascists (and other terrorists) are gone, and we don't have to put up with this crap any more. I don't believe it will happen, but I hope for it.
Posted by: ricki at August 13, 2006 02:32 PM (4ei3n)
10
First you type:
"I too am appalled by the idea that I would have to trust my cellphone, ipod, and laptop to the honesty of baggage handlers; that my nieces and nephew wouldn't be allowed crayons or snacks on a long, boring flight; that I can have my contact lenses, but not the solution I need to put them in my eyeballs..."
Then you conclude with:
"I think it should make us more focused on using ALL the resources we can to identify the dickwads who would do this and find out what they intend before they do it."
That's what they're trying to do, Miss California Tech, but you're too busy CONTRADICTING YOURSELF. When they try to use "ALL the resources" they can, you are "too appalled by the idea."
NO KIDDING it is sad that our lives must be disrupted for Muslim murderers, but I'd rather live a few hours without my bottle of RE-NU or my iPod rather than being annihilated at 30,000 feet.
Perhaps you prefer the Re-Nu and the iPod?
Malkin understands what we're facing. You clearly do not.
Posted by: Mark at August 15, 2006 09:03 PM (XkuJr)
11
Actually, Mr. way-more-interested in being sarcastic, using resources to the best of our abilities means BEING DAMN SMART about what we're doing, not taking away the freedoms of innocent people.
If we start taking these freedoms away, the terrorists win.
People like you and Michelle are giving them EXACTLY what they want: To divide us and then conquer.
Posted by: caltechgirl at August 15, 2006 09:06 PM (bM7x1)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
August 07, 2006
Memo to self....
Never give
a llama your work phone #. Or any phone # for that matter.
Posted by: caltechgirl at
12:40 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 21 words, total size 1 kb.
I HOPE this means what I think it means!
Reuters: 1 hour, 25 minutes ago
Peaceful succession under way in Cuba: official
Cuba has set in motion a peaceful political succession, dashing U.S. government expectations of chaos following Fidel Castro's hand-over of power to his brother, a leading Cuban intellectual and government member, Roberto Fernandez Retamar, said on Monday.
"They (the U.S. government) had not expected that a peaceful succession was possible. A peaceful succession has taken place in Cuba," Fernandez Retamar said at a news conference.
The writer and member of the Council of State was the first government official to say a succession under Raul Castro was in motion after Fidel Castro relinquished power a week ago following gastric surgery.
Stay tuned. As always,
Babalu has
the latest.
h/t
Smash
Posted by: caltechgirl at
12:02 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 140 words, total size 1 kb.
August 04, 2006
August 03, 2006
August 02, 2006
Must... blog...
Watch this space...
my take on Israel vs Hezboolahboolah
a story rattling around in my head
a must read article on parenting styles and society.
Coming soon!
Posted by: caltechgirl at
10:57 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 27 words, total size 1 kb.
July 31, 2006
So Israel is the bad guy, huh?
Michelle Malkin has
Israeli warning leaflets distributed to Lebanese civilians, asking them to leave town before the bombing raids.
As Michelle so eloquently puts it,"The only thing I remember raining down in Beirut in 1983 or the Khobar Towers in 1996 or NYC on 9/11 were ashes and dust."
Anyone who disagrees with that can personally kiss my ass.
Posted by: caltechgirl at
12:42 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 71 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Richmond at July 31, 2006 03:50 PM (e8QFP)
2
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/5248500.stm
Posted by: Conchubhar at August 08, 2006 02:19 AM (ARcf5)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
A lack of Education on your part.....
The always interesting Dafydd ab Hugh brings us
the tale of MA Gov. Mitt Romney, who recently described the Big Dig fiasco as a "
tar baby". Correctly, too, I might add.
Now, in this day and age, as you would expect,
certain groups got their panties in a collective twist over THEIR interpretation of the phrase, which they incorrectly assumed was a negative term referring to black people. And made him
apologize.
If these asshats would stop banning GOOD literature and movies because of their PC BULLSHIT, and had
actually read Uncle Remus or seen Disney's "
Song of the South", instead of mindlessly chucking them for the invocation of an unfortunate sterotype or two, they would know that the phrase "Tar Baby" refers to an inanimate object, covered in a sticky substance, that serves no other purpose than the trap the person unlucky enough to touch it.
A "Tar Baby" therefore, is really just a big, sticky, messy problem that will not go away. Sounds like the Big Dig, no?
So let's
call a spade a spade, and drop this whole pretended affrontery, ok? As Dafydd says:
"I reckon with some people, God was a bit niggardly in passing out brains."
Posted by: caltechgirl at
11:12 AM
| Comments (9)
| Add Comment
Post contains 211 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Funny, my interpretation of 'Tar Baby' has always been as yours. It simply stems from those who wish to find error.
Posted by: Stacy at July 31, 2006 11:28 AM (92p8H)
2
Who you callin a
spade?
Posted by: Cardinal Martini at July 31, 2006 12:00 PM (5LIuJ)
3
Sorry, I can't help but laugh.
Its so true, if ever there was a tar baby, the big dig is it.
Poor Mitt. I can almost like him now.
almost.
Posted by: LindaSoG at July 31, 2006 12:20 PM (GBBmd)
4
LOL...the talk of the local towns around here is about Mitt now. LOL...most people think it's funny and MOST people are really TICKED off about this Big Dig fiasco. Romney took control of the entire project and the investigations and all that...I just hope it doesn't come back to slap him in the face.
Posted by: Raven at July 31, 2006 12:34 PM (bwE9/)
5
Well how would you have liked it if he called it a "cracker barrel"?
Posted by: tyrone at July 31, 2006 05:13 PM (NGDKp)
6
Everybody's so ready to jump without even listening to what other people are saying, not to meantion what they meant. Nice post.
Posted by: Jane at July 31, 2006 05:44 PM (y6n8O)
7
I didn't even know what a tar baby was before this supposed controversy. I am, however, familiar with the Big Dig. That is a disaster.
Posted by: Shawn at July 31, 2006 05:57 PM (1nHnP)
8
I had to google "tar baby" to find out if I was the only person who had even heard of Uncle Remus. Of the top 10 links, only two even mention that tar baby has a derogatory aspect. Most just said that it was a kid's story with an African origin (not African-American, honestly and truly African). It's also a song by Sade. I wonder if she got yelled at about it...
Posted by: dirty rotten heathen at July 31, 2006 07:22 PM (EeEqT)
9
I always thought Tar Baby referred to a kid born in North Carolina.
Oh wait, maybe that is Tar
Heel Baby. :-)
Posted by: Mark at August 01, 2006 06:25 PM (vhH8Y)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
July 26, 2006
el 26 de julio
On 26 de julio, 1953, fidel cagastro and his band of commie idiots led a raid on one of the largest military garrisons in Cuba.
Nearly everything went wrong, the rebels were out numbered, part of the weapons caravan got lost on the way, and more than 2/3 of the rebels were killed or captured. Several of them ran for it, including the original coward, cagastro.
Oh, and BTW, he
WAS captured. Inept
pig that he is, he was found in the jungle shortly afterward and arrested. cagastro was in fact sentenced to death, but in a head-scratching moment worthy of Dr. Evil and his foul-tempered sea bass, Batista pardoned him in 1955.
Kinda ironic that such a stunning defeat serves as the namesake of the movement that brought cagastro to power, no?
So today is the day that Cuba celebrates her "glorious" revolucion. The banners and music displayed today continuing the web of lies that turned a humbling defeat into the rallying point of a damned revolution. Because the truth, in Cuba, depends on your point of view.
For the Cubanos, a proud and once prosperous people, it is a day to pretend their want and hunger are absent, and for cagastro and his cronies, a day to ignore the facade crumbling around them.
For more info on the battle of 26 julio , go
here.
For more thoughts on what this day means to Cubans, both in Cuba and elsewhere, try any of these wonderful Cuban bloggers:
El ConductorZivaMarcAlfredoKillcastroVal Prieto
Posted by: caltechgirl at
10:51 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 252 words, total size 2 kb.
July 24, 2006
Seven Year Itch
As most of you probably don't know, today is my wedding anniversary. Seven years of legal entanglement with the sweetest man on the face of the planet.
It seems funny to say "seven years" because really, it's been more and less. Really, we've been together almost a dozen years, since just before my 18th birthday. And realistically, you could say we've been married less because just after our wedding he went off to do his bit for Uncle Sam in armpit of Texas for three years. And honestly, we're only now FINALLY getting used to each other again.
Some days I adore him
Some days I downright hate him
But at the end of the day we can still work it out and be together, and that's what counts.
Happy Anniversary to my my best friend and lover. I love you!
Posted by: caltechgirl at
12:00 PM
| Comments (13)
| Add Comment
Post contains 142 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: wRitErsbLock at July 24, 2006 12:11 PM (sC/iL)
2
Congratulations. Your last sentence tells me that you have hit on the secret.."my best friend and lover." Most people have a spose, a best friend, and a lover. It is when they are all three one and the same that life is good.
Posted by: GUYK at July 24, 2006 12:18 PM (iAhlK)
3
Congratulations. Your last sentence tells me that you have hit on the secret.."my best friend and lover." Most people have a spouse, a best friend, and a lover. It is when they are all three one and the same that life is good.
Posted by: GUYK at July 24, 2006 12:18 PM (iAhlK)
4
*sniffle*
Congrats...however long it's been.
Posted by: Dana at July 24, 2006 12:27 PM (uXuyq)
Posted by: Sharon at July 24, 2006 01:17 PM (XkMYC)
6
Happy anniversary!! and many more.
Posted by: Marie at July 24, 2006 05:44 PM (qYyzW)
Posted by: Paul Burgess at July 25, 2006 05:57 AM (7EVyU)
8
Happy Anniversary to you and DH!
Posted by: Amanda at July 25, 2006 08:28 AM (ay+rD)
9
Congratulations...and may you have many, many more happy years together.
Posted by: Mrs_Who at July 25, 2006 05:13 PM (O22fs)
10
Congrats you two! Many more!
Posted by: phin at July 25, 2006 08:34 PM (9Vcb6)
Posted by: oddybobo at July 26, 2006 06:23 AM (6Gm0j)
12
Happy anniversary!
Posted by: Richmond at July 26, 2006 12:04 PM (e8QFP)
13
I'm late! GRR! Happy Late Anniversary!
Posted by: Bou at July 28, 2006 07:55 PM (iHxT3)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
July 19, 2006
Happy Happy!
It's the
Big 3-0 for sarahk, and she's not having the best day, despite some awesome presents!
Go give her some love!
And Happy Belated 31 to my favorite NC phishy!
Posted by: caltechgirl at
10:53 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 34 words, total size 1 kb.
1
why thank you! actually it turned out pretty great!
Posted by: sarahk at July 19, 2006 08:57 PM (xLpeJ)
2
Damn, I forgot to look at the calendar yesterday! There were 3 blogger birthdays. Guess I'll post them retroactively. And one of them was Sarah's! Sheesh.
Posted by: Jay at July 20, 2006 11:12 AM (9QZM8)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
July 17, 2006
Elisson Rules
The Debonair one has done an amazing thing for those of us still missing the Acidic One.
Here's Rob's
interview with WAGA about blogging and losing his job.
Thanks, dude.
Posted by: caltechgirl at
11:47 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 32 words, total size 1 kb.
July 13, 2006
July 12, 2006
Why you should never support PETA
They support people
like this.
The funny part? The stupid fucktards made two mistakes:
1. They left it on the wrong porch
2. It was broken and never exploded.
Posted by: caltechgirl at
06:14 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 38 words, total size 1 kb.
More News you can Use
A
fantastic damn fisking by Ken of
it comes in pints? regarding estate taxes and the lunatics who think that they are both useful and only for the rich.
Believe me, he knows a lot about the subject, from personal experience.....
Here's Ken's money shot....
After laying out the current law regarding estate exemptions through 2010, he says:
"this piece never mentions that in 2011 the exemption goes back to $1 million (and the top tax rate goes to 50%). Think about how much land prices (both home and farm) have increased in recent years. Think about how many people have IRAs and similar vehicles. How many of those estates will be valued at over $1 million five years from now? A lot of people who don't consider themselves rich are going to be very unpleasantly surprised." (emphasis mine)
Even if you don't know much about the Estate Tax issue,
drop by and read what Ken has to say. It's quite an education.
Posted by: caltechgirl at
03:04 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 168 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Why, thank you very kindly for the link!
Posted by: Ken Summers at July 12, 2006 03:45 PM (UefPN)
2
Quite an education indeed - thanks for pointing me in his direction...
Posted by: Richmond at July 17, 2006 10:48 AM (e8QFP)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
July 11, 2006
July 10, 2006
Pet Peeve Rant!
Inspired by
this thread at Dean's World.
One of my bigger pet peeves is how everyone in the world has an opinion about whether, or how, a young lady should change her name after marriage.
My own take? Every marriage is different, everyone's circumstances are different, and that's no reason to judge the fidelity or commitment of a relationship. Whatever the two people affected (the husband and wife) think is really all that matters.
I have known many people who got married in many different circumstances, from the new wife who immediately changes to her husband's name, to the couple who both change to a new last name. This doesn't mean that they are any less committed, that their relationship is any less intimate, or that their family is any less spiritual.
In fact, the couple I know who both changed their last name to an amalgam of the two original names were both pastors.
A professional woman is presented with a dilemma on her marriage. Should she continue to use the name that her friends and coworkers are accustmed to, that is written on her professional credentials and represents her body of work? Or should she start over with a new name? What will that mean to her career, especially in a field where name recognition is important?
If the marriage is successful, then no problem, she can build the majority of her career under her married name. But what if it is not? Many marriages end because of the stress of an early professional career. Take the case of Professor M, someone I studied with. Her maiden name was F, but she married and changed her name in graduate school. A few years later, she and Mr. M divorced, but she continued to use his name, because her degree and publications used that name. In fact, she is still known as Dr. M, although that hasn't legally been her name in almost 30 years. In fact, her legal name is Mrs. T, as she remarried a few years ago.
As for myself, I have chosen to use both. At work, I am Dr. CTG, and to the rest of the world, I am Mrs. CTGT (Hubby, of course, being Mr. GMT). And honestly, it would be easier to take hubby's name. Those of you who know my own name are nodding your heads in agreement, as his name is both shorter and easier to spell for other people, but it is as important to me to be one as it is to be the other, so I use both. And it works for both of us.
Posted by: caltechgirl at
01:14 PM
| Comments (11)
| Add Comment
Post contains 437 words, total size 3 kb.
1
I kept my ex's last name after we divorced bacuse I had it for 9 years in a professional
enviroment... it was easier to keep it. I did change it when I got married again. It was just easier than trying to explain the difference and I had been at the job long enough that a name change was easy.
Posted by: vw bug at July 10, 2006 01:46 PM (fvpSZ)
2
Oh... the point being that circumstances make the name. Everyone should do what is best for them.
Posted by: vw bug at July 10, 2006 01:47 PM (fvpSZ)
3
Yeah, I basically kept my name because of hte whole "being published under that name" thing. Which is useless now, since I dropped out of grad school. Oh well. If someone else has a problem with it, they can bite me.

I don't care if people call me Mrs. HubbysName. It's not like I'm offended by it. (And heck, by keeping my maiden name, it's easy to avoid telemarketers! "Nope, Mrs. HubbysName doesn't live here.")
Posted by: silvermine at July 10, 2006 04:40 PM (a92Ma)
4
My brother-in-law actually took my sister's last name when they got married because she had all her pubs under her maiden name and he really wanted them to have the same last name. I call that flexibility. And it worked out well for my dad (who never really cared, but he did have only girls so the name was going byebye. This way it didn't.)
But yeah, whatever works, names just aren't that big a deal, IMO.
Posted by: beth at July 10, 2006 05:35 PM (IUoqt)
5
I wasn't going to take hubby's last name, since his daughter and I have the same first name; I didn't want to confuse things even more by both of us having the same first and last name. But husband got really upset that I didn't want his name. So we agreed I'd take his name but any writing I do will continue to be under my maiden name. It's a publication thing. Not to mention, my maiden name is so much more fun to sign!
No one could spell or pronounce my maiden name; no one can spell or pronounce my married name.
Posted by: wRitErsbLock at July 10, 2006 06:02 PM (0Pi1o)
6
My friends from college solved this problem in a rather useful way. His middle name happened to be her (original) last name. She hyphenated, but never quite convinced him to do so.
Posted by: Ken Summers at July 10, 2006 06:03 PM (YElNr)
7
But here's an another interesting question to chew on for those women who do change their last name: What middle name do you use? My limited experience has been about half and half: Some keep original middle name, some use original last name. It certainly makes some sense to do so but I have yet to meet someone who uses both.
Posted by: Ken Summers at July 10, 2006 06:06 PM (YElNr)
8
It really meant something to my hubby to have me take his last name, so I did. It wasn't that big a deal to me. And now that we have a child, I do like having one family name.
Since I never had a middle name, I use my pre-married name as my middle name, and that's the middle name we gave to our son too. So, that name lives on.
I've written many technical manuals under my old name, so I'll always include both on my resume.
Posted by: Marie at July 11, 2006 07:32 AM (dswo0)
9
The only advice I would give is for a woman NOT choose to keep her married name for the sake of the kids. I did that, and wish I hadn't...I'm remarried now, but in the newspaper, it had my 1st married name next to my new husband-to-be's name...kind of weird.
Posted by: Mrs_Who at July 11, 2006 08:58 AM (rtTnw)
10
Ken: "But here's an another interesting question to chew on for those women who do change their last name: What middle name do you use?"
I kept my original middle name. I posted on Dean's re the hassle in changing IDs on everything and that I probably wouldn't do it again--still feel the same. Early on in our marriage we decided that if we were to have a son, he would have my maiden name as his middle one. However, we had a daughter, and it wouldn't have worked, although she and her dad have the same middle name (Leigh).
Posted by: cardeblu at July 11, 2006 10:24 AM (1agzX)
11
Once again, the old adage is true. Opinions are like a$$holes, everybody has one...
I *did* change my last name when I got married. ::shrugs:: Whatever anyone else does is completely up to them...
Posted by: Richmond at July 12, 2006 08:49 AM (e8QFP)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
July 06, 2006
If anybody talks to Chrissy....
Tell her I feel like I'm spinning on my thumb because there's nothing I can do to help,
and she needs to call me and tell me what I can do for her. Anything at all. The post office is down the street from my house, after all.
She doesn't know it, but her cheerfulness and her friendship really got me through when Dad was in the hospital. And now it's my turn to do something for her. I'm just waiting for orders.
UPDATE: I spoke to Christina this afternoon. She's ok, but (I suspect) beginning to be a little overwhelmed by the enormity of what was lost, and how many little things we take for granted everyday. The good news is that everyone and the pets are ok, and the insurance is covering whatever they need. Thank God.
Posted by: caltechgirl at
09:56 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 148 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I just sent you her cell number... in case you didn't have it.
Posted by: Bou at July 06, 2006 11:13 AM (LUU0H)
2
Oddybobo talked to her yesterday. I think we are all just waiting to see what we can do to help out....
Posted by: Richmond at July 06, 2006 11:27 AM (e8QFP)
3
She says she is doing fine and that they are ok, and that right now she doesn't need anything, but to let you know that she is thankful for your concern.
Posted by: Oddybobo at July 06, 2006 12:20 PM (6Gm0j)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
75kb generated in CPU 0.0535, elapsed 0.1522 seconds.
83 queries taking 0.1179 seconds, 270 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.