January 29, 2006
Hello, Grandma?
Glenn links to
this interesting post at Dr. Helen's site about Grandparents who don't have time to grandparent, based on
this article. He asks if these are the same parents who were too busy to be parents, and Dr. Helen wonders if the lack of relationship between children and the extended family keeps them from understanding close human interactions or makes them believe that love is really only about material things. The answer is:
well, DUH.
I can just see these women who don't want to be Grandma. Twenty years ago, these were the self-obsessed, career driven mothers of my friends. Trying to be there for the after-school pick up and the PTA, but not worrying overly much if the kids had to walk home or the PTA brownies came from the grocery store. Too busy with their own lives to consider that the "safe" neighborhood the kids walked home through was still dangerous after dark, that the grocery store brownies told all the other kids that you didn't really care, that you were too busy for your kid.
And Hell Yes, we made fun of those kids.
The 80s was all about the Superwoman. Could Mom work outside the home and still have a clean house and take care of the kids? The consensus was that something had to give. For a lot of these women, it was the precious moments with their kids, the small kindnesses that mean so much, and the closeness that the rest of us shared with our moms. Yet they fooled themselves that because the house was clean and the kids were doing well in school that they could have it all.
Somehow it was never important to be there, to make time. And now that their children are parents, these now grown-up children realize what they missed, and they want that for their own children. So they make time, they skip meetings and make brownies, they ask Grandma and Grandpa to spend time with the kids, and they are still disappointed.
But it's more than that. Being Grandma is being old. Hell, most of our grandmothers were at least in their 70s. For the most part, they weren't active, independently wealthy, and still working in their chosen career. Our grandmas were cooks and knitters and nurturers, with their silver hair and never ending fount of kleenex and hard candies. Today's grandmas are tech-saavy, go to work every morning, and command respect outside the home. If you were a balls-to-the-wall coroporate type, would you want to be called ANYTHING that brings to mind a blue haired woman in a rocker?
And being Grandma is an imposition. After all, it wasn't their choice to have babies, toddlers, and children around again. Their kids did this to them. The author of the article even says this in reference to her grandchildren:
Look, I'd love to nip over and whisper secrets into 1-month-old Maggie's ears, or to dress 2-year-old Ryan in the black leather jacket I bought her recently and take her to look for late blackberries in Golden Gate Park on my bike (with its deluxe new kid seat). But I have a job. I'm a reporter, I have two books to write, a husband who wants to go to France, and I just bought an investment property in Portland, Oregon. I love my grandchildren, but being a grandmother got added to my to-do list.
[emphasis mine]
Added to her to-do list. As if she only is Grandma because she has to be. As if she never expected her own children to grow up and have children of their own. Maybe she just doesn't see her own children as self-actualized individuals with lives and loves of their own. Or maybe she didn't want her children to be tied down the way she was. Another Grandma in the article is quoted as saying (paraphrasing here) that while she loves her grandbabies and wants to be a part of their lives, she's not willing to give up her life to deal with them.
If being a grandma is so damn inconvenient, it's a wonder some of the parents of these grandkids were even born so their moms could be grandmas. Hell, Roe has been the law of the land for more than 30 years.
Posted by: caltechgirl at
02:41 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 718 words, total size 4 kb.
1
My mouth dropped when I read about the retired judge. If my Mom was not there when my daughters were born, I would be really hurt. Being there for the birth and helping is not about being a grandparent, but being a loving parent to your child.
Posted by: Amy at January 29, 2006 06:52 PM (JFN4H)
2
While I am a career mom, my sacrifice has been my home. It is in shambles but I wouldn't sacrifice cuddle time for all the clean houses anywhere!
Posted by: oddybobo at January 30, 2006 06:19 AM (6Gm0j)
3
And now from the 'Grammies' in the bunch! *S* I just wish I could be a Grandma to my g/kids; instead, I'm now raising two of them. It somehow seemed easier 20 years ago than it is now.
Posted by: Michele at January 30, 2006 08:21 AM (t4sfV)
4
I'm glad my son's grandmas WANT to see him every chance they get... which isn't even enough! I'll have to come back later & read the full article...
Posted by: Marie at January 30, 2006 09:07 AM (ZNESr)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 27, 2006
January 23, 2006
I'm ready for my close up, Mr. DeMille....
Meet Margi and Koolaid's little
Peanut. Mommy's home, but baby is going to stay in the NICU to bulk up a little. They'll let him go home when he hits his fighting weight
Congrats again, you two. You did good!
Posted by: caltechgirl at
11:17 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 56 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Thank you, sweetheart. We're both dragging pretty badly because we're here in the NICU from early AM until late at night but that little boy is such an adorable bundle of love and joy that the hours fly by.
Hopefully we'll be able to take him home where he belongs -- soon. Your love and good thoughts means the world to us.
xoxo
All our love,
M & M
Posted by: Margi at January 24, 2006 04:13 PM (R0qt+)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 20, 2006
Memo to the Moms to be out there...
Specifically those of you close to the finish line (
Deb,
Dana,
Mrs. Phin, etc.)...
Don't let
this give you any ideas about bringing another blog-baby into the world this week
Welcome to the world, Barrett Elijah (Paladin)! You must have been in a real hurry, to come out after only 7 hours!
Posted by: caltechgirl at
05:00 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 67 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Just stopping by to say Hello... Oh yes, our prayers are with Mikey and his family. We can certainly empathize with them as I have been there done thatÂ…
Posted by: Edd at January 20, 2006 08:29 PM (aaXuU)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
More Good News!
Smash has a fabulous AAR from his
visit in the hospital with Mikey.
Mikey is definitely in there, responding to touch and to words, and fighting hard to get better and come back to us as the Mikey we all know.
Keep praying folks, he's a long way from out of the woods...... And keep hitting the PayPal button (on the sidebar here), almost $1000 donated so far!
Posted by: caltechgirl at
03:08 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 72 words, total size 1 kb.
January 19, 2006
Congratualtions are in order!
Margi's Little Peanut
made his debut this afternoon weighing in at 4 lbs and 15 oz and is 18
inches long. Small but feisty.
Little man and Mommy are both doing well! More to come as soon as Koolaid can tear himself away!
It's a good day for blog babies, today is also Draco Esmay's 1st birthday
Posted by: caltechgirl at
07:08 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 64 words, total size 1 kb.
January 18, 2006
Make Mikey's Day!
Smash and Da Goddess have set up a PayPal fund to help out Mikey's family. Although they have insurance, there's a hefty deductible, and Mikey won't be bringing in a paycheck for a long time. Mrs. Mikey can't work either, as she is staying by his side. Every little bit you can drop in the bucket helps.
The button is on the sidebar. Click early and often!!
Come on folks, you donated almost $100,000 in 11 days to Soldier's Angels, surely we can raise enough to buy gas and groceries for a few weeks!
If you's like to send a card, Smash has generously made his PO Box available. The address is:
Mad Mikey
c/o SMASH
PO Box 882353
San Diego, CA 92108-2353
Thanks for all the comments and wishes, I know Mrs. Mikey and their daughter really appreciate everyone's support and prayers!
Latest updates
here.
Posted by: caltechgirl at
11:51 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 147 words, total size 1 kb.
One Peanut, on his way!
Koolaid took
Margi to the hospital today. No baby yet, they just want to watch her closely as the pre-eclampsia signs are starting to ramp up and the little man will probably be asked to make his grand entrance by this weekend.
Keep the Lowrys in your prayers as they wait for their special delivery!
Posted by: caltechgirl at
03:12 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 64 words, total size 1 kb.
1
A little early isn't it?
To bad your not here or you could go visit her.
Posted by: Tige at January 18, 2006 04:19 PM (QgCnE)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 17, 2006
Tuesday Mikey Update
GOOD NEWS!from
DaGoddess:
"I spoke with Mrs. Mikey a while ago and this is the update I received:
Sedation was lowered and Mikey responded. The nurse was wiping his
face with a cloth, he seemed to like it, and turned toward her. She
told him to turn his head back the other way but he wouldn't do so.
Mrs. Mikey told him to turn his head toward her, and he did!
At one point, Mrs. Mikey was talking to her friend about him and he
pulled her arm. She asked him if he wanted her to stop talking about
him and he pulled her arm again. She stopped talking about him and he
relaxed.
They've reduced his blood pressure medication because his blood pressure has come down. Yay!
His blood pressure and his ICP are lowest when his daughter is by his side.
This is all good news. Very good news. Still, he's not out of the
woods yet. The doctor has told Mrs. Mikey that there is brain damage,
no doubt about it. How much? They don't know yet. And the stroke
occurred in the part of the brain that controls personality and
cognitive ability. Mikey may not be the same guy he was before."
So, good news and bad, mostly good news, though, and we'll all just have to wait and see....
Posted by: caltechgirl at
05:09 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 229 words, total size 1 kb.
1
That is wonderful news.
Posted by: oddybobo at January 18, 2006 08:02 AM (6Gm0j)
2
I don't know any of you from Adam, but the news about your friend Mikey is the most depressing thing I've heard all day. I checked his blog as a result and was touched by the Sci Fi Friday post (one of my favorites too). I hope your friend pulls through with all of his wits about him.
Posted by: cube at January 18, 2006 10:52 AM (pVWg8)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 16, 2006
One more post for Mikey...
Pixy has set up a post on Mikey's blog where you can leave your thoughts and prayers for his wife.
To do so, go
here. And go
here for updates as they come in.
Posted by: caltechgirl at
01:55 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 43 words, total size 1 kb.
Mikey Update
From
Da Goddess:
"Mikey had surgery tonight to remove the blood clot and stop other bleeding. His intracranial pressure is rising (not a good sign) and he remains in a medically induced coma. His wife is trying her best to be strong, but it's difficult. She's scared and confused."
Da Goddess will update her page as soon as she gets more news. Please keep up the good wishes and prayers for Mikey and his family, as it seems he needs them now more than ever!
You can drop by Mikey's page or Da Goddess's to leave messages of support for Mikey's family.
Posted by: caltechgirl at
12:15 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 106 words, total size 1 kb.
January 14, 2006
Those darn boys...
I was the only child, you see, and the youngest grandchild on both sides by a minimum of 10 years, so stories like this are foreign to me....
Drink Warning!
This happened at Bou's house tonight:
"Today the boys informed me they were going to have Bones put on his Hulk costume and then shoot nerf stuff at his butt to see if he could feel it. Nice. The crap they come up with amazes me.
So I'm in the kitchen making a salad and I hear, "Let's punch him now and see if he feels it!"
Yeah, that's never a good thing to hear.
I was in that room within fractions of a second to find my youngest standing in the middle of the room, but almost looking bow legged. I shouted, "STOP! There WILL BE NO PUNCHING!"
They know the rules: the Be No's of this home. There will be no punching. There will be no kicking. There will be no spitting. Or typically as I say it, "There will be no punching, kicking, hitting, spitting or beating of each other!"
All three of them looked at me blank faced like, "Are YOU talking TO ME?" Like they were innocent. I heard them. I HEARD THEM!
Finally one of the eldest said, "Mom, we're going to hit him in the weenie; he can't feel it. He's wearing 20 pairs of underwear"
But wait, there's more.... Read the
whole thing.
Posted by: caltechgirl at
11:06 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 246 words, total size 2 kb.
1
There are days I am the referee... and there are days that my sole existence in this life is to insure that Darwin's Theory of Survival of the Fittest does not inact itself in my home. Every day I see potential extinction from my gene pool...
Posted by: Bou at January 15, 2006 04:23 PM (iHxT3)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
The state of Health Care today...
As most of you know, my Dad was recently hospitalized for MAJOR surgery to remove a tumor. Due to some complications (edema and pneumonia), his total hospital stay was 21 days, including 4 in the ICU and 2 more in "telemetry step down", which is similar, but less closely monitored.
In any case, the total bill was (get ready for it) $196,787.63.
Yes, you read that right.
Now, my parents are lucky enough to have fabulous insurance, a PPO plan that includes $0 co-pay for inpatient services and considers the hospital Dad was treated in as a preferred provider.
The insurance paid $51,975.00. The hospital considers the bill paid under their PPO agreement.
Imagine if they had no insurance or minimal insurance. They would have had to sell the house to save Dad's life.
Clearly the hospitals have jacked up the prices so far that they're still breaking even (and probably doing well) taking in just 26.4% of the bill. And it's no anomaly. Their insurance plan is one of the major plans in town, as Mom's employer is the largest in the county. The hospital expects that the majority of their patients will be under a PPO plan. So why jack up the prices that high? To screw the poor and uninsured? To make them choose between saving their life and caring for their family?
No wonder the insurance companies are complaining. If this wasn't a PPO provider, and the insurance paid 80% (what my last plan would have paid for a non-PPO inpatient stay), the insurance company would have been out $157,430.104, more than 3 times what they paid....
The system is out of control. But socialized medicine isn't the answer either. So what should be done?
Posted by: caltechgirl at
10:24 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 301 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Clearly socialized medicine won't help. Hospitals will charge more and provide less knowing the government will always pay the bills.
Posted by: Cardinal Martini at January 14, 2006 11:38 PM (nLV11)
2
No good answer but we saw the same when my dad died. In fact I see it everytime I take my kids to the peditrician.
Posted by: vw bug at January 15, 2006 08:10 AM (4oOot)
3
My brother had major emergencey surgery (the same thing that killed Maurice Gibb) a few years ago. He had insurance, but there were thousands and thousands of dollars it didn't cover. He was lying in his bed, not a day after the surgery, when some chick from billing came down and started harassing him over how he was going to pay. The nurse had to come in and force her to leave since she was upsetting him. He's still paying off that bill.
Now, if he were here illegally and had no insurance, he'd be worry free. (No, I'm not bitter)
As for what to do? I don't know. You're right, socialized medicine isn't the answer. And then you see things like botique medicine popping up. For $400 a month, you have access to a personal doctor who has a limited number of patients, including house calls, and 24 hour service. They just opened one here.
And even socialized medicine in Canada has a private aspect that's growing. Thier own version of botique medicine. I was just reading an article about a private health center/hospital that opened in Vancouver.
A friend of mine in B.C. took her dad to the doctor for pain. They scheduled him for tests, but he was put on a six month waiting list for those tests. A few weeks later, he was no better, so she cheated -- as she called it -- and took him to the emergencey room, where they did the tests and they discovered her had cancer. He was dead three months later, before he would have even had the tests he was waiting for.
Posted by: Ith at January 15, 2006 11:33 AM (sCBe0)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 13, 2006
Boundaries: Online and Off
An open series of questions to any of you with blogs, we'll call this the last audience participation special of
National De-Lurking Week:
Do you blog under your real name?
Do your family/ off-line friends know about the blog?
Is that a reason you don't use your real name?
If you blog anonymously, have your off-line friends who know about the blog ever outed you to someone you'd prefer to keep away from your blog?
Doesn't it piss you off when people cross your personal blog boundaries?
How do you go about handling something like that (which is really an invasion of your privacy)?
I ask this because dear
Helen just experienced a major betrayal of her boundaries at an incredibly bad time, and I had a similar, though not nearly so devastating experience recently, and I know others who have (or are about to) run screaming from their old blogs because of trolls they knew in real life (you know who you are).
Your thoughts? Any advice for Helen? I really am interested to hear what you have to say.
Email me if you don't feel all that comfortable leaving a comment....
Posted by: caltechgirl at
02:41 PM
| Comments (15)
| Add Comment
Post contains 193 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Since I've started keeping my blog, I've used my real-life nickname to sign the posts. So, it doesn't appear on any official records that I'm aware of, but some people outside blogland could probably put things together if they ever stumbled across my blog.
That having been said, I worry sometimes about my professors finding my blog and what I've written about them. But, cest la vie.
I think Helen's in a difficult situation. She really can't -- I mean she doesn't have the ability -- to control what her family does. So, she should probably assume from this point forward that they are going to read her blog regardless of whether they tell her they won't. Therefore, she has to make a decision; either she should continue to blog and expect friction with her family, or she should stop blogging (and probably resent her family for forcing her to stop). Of course, another possibility is to discontinue her current blog, and start a new, anonymous one that she doesn't tell her family about. It's a bad deal, but I think that's it.
Posted by: Cardinal Martini at January 13, 2006 03:27 PM (dAOZx)
2
I do not use my real name. I do tell my friends and family about my blog. I tell them not to use my real name. I have a blog for the purpose of letting my family, who is all over the world, know what is going on in my little piece of the world. It is also a scrapbook for my use in the future. That is also why my blog is fairly 'clean'. ;-)
Posted by: vw bug at January 13, 2006 03:56 PM (4oOot)
3
Okay, I'm channeling the sober side of my mind right now.
Obviously I use a handle, to protect my family and friends.
My friends and wife/kids know about my blog, but no one else in my family.
No, again I'm protecting my family. I have a relatively common name, it would be hard to hunt me down, with out sorting through the various others that share my name.
My minions, er employees found my blog about 3 months ago. That kinda sucks, no more minion stories.
Depending on what you mean by that. I've had a couple of bloggers try to force more personal information about me through e-mails. But I've never been upset by anyone reading my blog. I've naturally censored myself. That's hard to believe isn't it?
I did something similar to this back in November, I wrote off the people and have decided not to continue my relationship with them.
As for Helen, I'm sorry that happened to her. Betrayel is something that I've never, ever been able to forgive. Hopefully she's a nicer person then I am. If that's the case, I'll wish them to the firey bowels of hell for her.
Posted by: Contagion at January 13, 2006 04:13 PM (e8b4J)
4
Drunk brain says:
Get new url.
Posted by: Contagion at January 13, 2006 04:14 PM (e8b4J)
5
I'm completely anonymous and it's for this very reason.
Not that there is anything on my blog (at least, this latest incarnation) that I would be
upset about if my family found it, nor is there anything that would upset them.
I think. *knocks on wood*
But it would definitely change the way I blog and the freedom I feel when I want to vent or whatever on my blog.
I feel really bad for Helen. If I were her, I would have changed digs the first time I realized my family was reading me and then send out emails to all my bloggin' buds about my new address.
Because let's face it; nobody can stop reading someone they know. If anything, once they realize they *know* you in real life, the more they'll read your blog. They can't help it. Humans are far too curious.
I know of a husband and wife who were blogging on the same blog about their marriage and they went through some tough times. So he started his own blog to vent about the way their marriage was going, asked her not to go there and, incredibly, *believed* her when she promised she was not going to read it.
Well, guess what? She DID go over there and read it, of course, and then all hell broke loose.
Their shrink told them to take the blogs down altogether and rightfully so.
I don't know; I know nobody likes switching blog addresses. You always lose some readers and it's just a huge hassle, but if her family is going to haunt her...dunno. :-( It's just a damn shame.
Posted by: Amber at January 13, 2006 04:37 PM (zQE5D)
6
New blog for sure. It's not that big of an undertaking, annoying as it may be. Heck, leave the old one there and write sanitary stuff it matters not who sees, and say what you really want elsewhere.
I have always used a real name based pseudonym/pen name that predates blogging and is close enough not to be hard to figure out. Eventually I have even stated my real surname, increasingly less circuitously, on my blog. Over the course of time family has come to read it, if they are online, if they care to bother, and that has been weird at times but overall not unwanted. None of them would have sought it out had I not flagged it, though having to explain about marrying another blogger made it harder to hide.
Anyway, blogging is cheap and anonymity is easy if you really want it.
Posted by: Jay at January 13, 2006 06:03 PM (ip0hZ)
7
1. No - but my nick-name is known by a lot of other people so I'm not real anonymous, and once you add in the signature line...vague but probably not real hard for a determined idiot to ferret out. I avoid my last name since it's uncommon and an immediate trackback - some anonymity is better than naked floundering IMO.
2. Some - My wife knows, it bores her. My family is grown up and don't give a shit, friends who might know don't care either and aren't into reading people's computer crap, spewed out onto the 'Net.
3. No - But I'm definitely not into exposing my inner soul -- or believe it's particularly interesting to anybody anyhow. I just do what I feel like and it doesn't happen to involve much internal turbidity revealed.
4. No - nobody really cares, and I don't have an intense emotional investment in it either, but if you need to keep *certain* people away it's probably better if you weren't bound up in the blog-thing and found other means of expression.
5. No - Not yet anyhow - What the hell are personal blog-boundaries? Any troll can post if you let them. IMO there's nothing confidential about a blog on the Internet - it's just everybody's warts and moles, or it's paint drying and what they had for lunch - or not, or worse.
6. Privacy? Keep a towel handy and shut the drapes. It's always a bad time for somebody somewhere, there's a relative in the Hospital dying every day - that's one reason why they park their cars so badly and drop garbage on the sidewalk.
Posted by: -keith in mtn. view at January 13, 2006 06:12 PM (DTmtI)
8
1) Yes I do. Mostly, because I have little to hide, and partly to let people who've known me from way back when get in touch with me again. It's happened 4 times off the top of my head, when someone from my past found my site, and said hello. Usually it's good to reconnect.
2) My brother knows my blog exists, and my mom, at least one aunt, and several cousins read it on occasion. It's a little disconcerting, and since my mom found my blog, my entries have been a little bit more... restrained. Not that there was ever anything unseemly, but I'm less inclined to post about a rash wave of emotion (usually disgust or unpleasantness) than I was in the past.
3) N/A
4) Only if you count a cousin to her mom, to my mother.
5) (this question is a bit leading....could it be rephrased?) It's come very close to on a few occasions, but I can't think of any time in the past year and a half it's come close. Which probably means I'm lucky. Closest I came was someone leaching a picture of mine.
6) I redirected the picture link to lemonparty (I'm cruel that way, don't go to that site). He leached for 3 more days, then his background went white. Which is very funny, cause he was on myspace, which has a no nudity or offensive clause.
I have no advice for Helen that would do any good, and probably only make things worse. i try to avoid that, so I decline that invitation.
Posted by: Bill at January 13, 2006 08:43 PM (ujJj1)
9
1. I blog under my real first name.
2. Yes, but I told them about it. I had a blog to help family keep up with my girls, but I got tired of maintaining two blogs. So I combined them.
3. NA
4. No one has crossed by personal blog boundaries, but I think they are very low to begin with.
5. I am struggling with answering this question and would have to say it depends on the situation. I do consider my blog MY space. It is for ME and I can do what I want with it, unlike so many other aspects of my life.
I feel for Helen. But I think her sister outing her is a symptom of bigger issues.
Sometimes I do regret making my blog known to my family. What I can't blog I would not blog anyway. I have less sexual inuendos, but I don't need a blog for that kind of outlet!
Posted by: Amy at January 13, 2006 09:01 PM (JFN4H)
10
1. I blog under my real last name, after having started out using my full name. I've been owning up to my opinions in public since junior-high school, why stop now?
2. Most of my friends who know about my blog found it by way of my website, a few others because I told them about it. One, I think a mutual acquaintance found it and told him, at a time when he and I weren't friends -- but something I posted helped patch it up.
3 & 4: N/A
5 & 6: I have a stated policy that I'll refer people to if I think they need to know what they'll be going up against, and it boils down to, "Your only shelter here is my goodwill -- squander it at your peril." My boundaries are rarely transgressed.
Posted by: McGehee at January 14, 2006 05:41 AM (lAOTn)
11
As for Helen's predicament, the blogging platform I use has some really cool tools that can block people from even viewing my site, if I have the necessary information about how they're getting there.
Posted by: McGehee at January 14, 2006 05:51 AM (lAOTn)
12
I blog under one of my middle names. My husband knows about my blog,and no-one else.
I never understood why Helen didn't change her address the first time this issue came up. I realize she has issues about 'moving house' but I would rather move the blog than worry about trusting this person not to look again. Human nature being what it is.
Posted by: Jocelyn at January 14, 2006 10:59 AM (jkRb/)
13
1) Nope. Further, Owlish was never a nickname. I think someone in the real world, who knew that I blogged, could probably find my blog, but it would be difficult.
2) No family knows. Some friends know, but not ones I'm closest too.
3) Partially. My name is common enough that hunting me down through Googling my name is difficult, and my family probably wouldn't make the effort.
The other part is, being gay. It might or might not make my profession more difficult. I suspect it would make my parents' life more difficult, if people in their small town knew.
4) Nope. And, yeah, it would suck.
Posted by: owlish at January 14, 2006 05:58 PM (uPnzE)
14
1. No, I don't. I used to, until I had problems similar to Helen's. I also moved my blog, but the asshats found me anyway, by reading other's links.
2. My immediate family knows, and some cousins; they don't care, much. Don't read terribly often, either. They aren't much for the computer.
3. Nope. I do it mostly for professional reasons now (work for DoD). And because of a stalker (a BAD one) from my distant past.
4. The Asshat Clan crossed my personal boundaries, but I never told them about my blog. They just found it. Pissed me off. Twice, heh.
5. I honestly think that curiosity being what it is, and human nature being what it is, that some folks will go to pretty great lengths to find you, even if you do move your blog. They can look at some of the blogrolls of Helen's best blog friends, and figure it out from there. I mean, unless she totally changes how she writes, and that's pretty difficult. Again, I say this from direct experience.
My suggestion is that she track her visitors carefully, block IPs like there's no tomorrow, or password-protect her site. Or she can harrass the hell out of the offenders. Which I did, and while I don't know if that's what eventually got them to stop, I do know it brought me great satisfaction.
Posted by: liv at January 14, 2006 08:43 PM (alGQE)
15
Howinhell did I miss this???
My Answers (as if you didn't know):
1. Yes, I blog under my real name. Damn stupid idea if you ask me.
2. Yes. Family knows and all of the friends I have know.
3. N/A
4. N/A
5. I think it's very much like Steve said: there is a subset of scummy people who live for drama, controversy and to read things/watch things from people they don't like. I think they're twisted. As for my personal situation? There is one ex-friend of mine whom I wish would quit reading but that's not going to happen. So I just don't think about her. My hubby's ex-wife and demon spawn read my blog. Every day. And that's the one that squicks me out. I usually don't hear from her, though, until she's out of medication.
6. So far, placing them on "ignore" helps. But when it comes to the baby, I'm done. I'm closing margilowry.com for good. I have started an anonymous blog on a free site and maybe I'll use it. There are a few of you that I've met through blogging that I love and with whom I will keep in touch -- if only to send baby pictures -- but I will not post pictures of my baby on a blog. I just can't do it.
I won't give them the satisfaction.
Posted by: Margi at January 15, 2006 01:35 PM (nwEQH)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 11, 2006
Happy Birthday!
To my wonderful Mother and my dear friend A.
And to adorable Brandon, too.
Here's to a better year than the last and many many more.
Posted by: caltechgirl at
07:32 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 30 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Happy Birthday Caltechgirl's Mom (and thanks for the humor!). Happy Birthday A.
Posted by: vw bug at January 11, 2006 11:14 AM (4oOot)
2
Happy Birthday to CTG's mom and A!
A very special day indeed...
http://www.brandondufau.com/archives/000201.html
Posted by: Amanda at January 11, 2006 11:39 AM (ay+rD)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 09, 2006
It's National De-lurking Week
At least, according to
this lovely lady (from whom I
stoleborrowed this graphic).

Follow the directions and nobody gets hurt....
Come on, you know you've got something to say..... And I'd love to know who you are.
Don't think I don't
see you out there....
Posted by: caltechgirl at
02:14 PM
| Comments (12)
| Add Comment
Post contains 52 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Hey, I leave comments, much to your chagrin.
Posted by: Contagion at January 09, 2006 03:39 PM (Q5WxB)
Posted by: Deb at January 09, 2006 05:43 PM (ip0hZ)
3
I'm not really a lurker, I only play one on TV.
Posted by: Paul Burgess at January 10, 2006 04:23 AM (7EVyU)
Posted by: Amanda at January 10, 2006 05:19 AM (ay+rD)
5
[enters to accomopaniment of oldtime movie "lurking" music]
Hi'ya!
[leaves to accomopaniment of oldtime movie "lurking" music]
Posted by: McGehee at January 10, 2006 06:05 AM (lAOTn)
6
It wasn't me. I was never here, and you can't make me say otherwise.
Posted by: Jenna at January 10, 2006 08:43 AM (f/kUC)
Posted by: Marie at January 10, 2006 12:16 PM (ZNESr)
8
It's not really lurking, if you really don't have much to say.
Posted by: owlish at January 10, 2006 01:29 PM (GDqxH)
Posted by: Kathy at January 10, 2006 03:55 PM (hbcMs)
10
Follow the directions and nobody gets hurt....
But what if we're hoping for a bit of pain, a spanking perhaps?
Posted by: phin at January 10, 2006 08:09 PM (DGPlf)
11
"Lurk this way..." (dragging foot)
Posted by: -keith in mtn. view at January 11, 2006 11:55 AM (DTmtI)
Posted by: Katie at January 11, 2006 09:50 PM (QjfVD)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 04, 2006
So I was trying to write this Meme....
...that
Margi tagged me with, and I was watching the PC about the miner who went to the hospital, when a woman ran up to Anderson Cooper screaming that all the other miners were dead. Seems that just when they told us all was well, the worst possible thing happened. And I'm sobbing. Just sobbing.
How in God's name did they fuck this up so badly? We were wondering why we didn't see the miners come out, why the ambulances weren't running, why the hospital only received one patient.
Now we know. What kind of cruel bastard would let this happen to these poor people who have suffered so much over the last two days? How could they have been taken from the depths of despair to utter joy, back to horrified pain again?
The president of the mine company is on TV right now, eating a big shit sandwich. Trying to cover his ass, but frankly the man is going to burn for it. He says his company never said everyone was alive. But in reality, they never said that they weren't either. His company could have avoided this
SNAFU by saying that they
COULD NOT CONFIRM that there were any survivors.
Now he's spinning like a top. Your ass is
SO toast buddy. Your company is going down in a blaze of courtroom glory.
Anyway, maybe tomorrow I'll answer that meme and Fight On! for USC, but tonight, I just don't have the heart.
Let your dear ones know you love them everyday. You never know which day is the one when they won't come back to you.
Posted by: caltechgirl at
12:16 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 280 words, total size 2 kb.
1
I'm planning on doing a post on this later today after I'm done doing some research. So far it appears it was the media the screwed this up, not the mining company. In fact this morning at the newstand every paper had headlines that said 12 of 13 miners found alive. Yet, lastnight when I went to bed, the news was already saying all but one had died.
Posted by: Contagion at January 04, 2006 05:38 AM (Q5WxB)
2
Actually, the headlines are a result of the news cycle. All the eastern/central papers were "put to bed" before the news was announced. They were showing the papers in a "Dewey defeats Truman" way on the news channels at 4-5 am EST. I was up hacking my brains out and watching.
Sadly, it was indeed the mining company that F'd up. They knew 20 minutes after the initial release that there were 12 total fatalities, yet they sat on it for 2 and a half hours by my reckoning.
That is unacceptable.
Posted by: caltechgirl at January 04, 2006 08:20 AM (uI/79)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
79kb generated in CPU 0.0238, elapsed 0.0688 seconds.
82 queries taking 0.0526 seconds, 251 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.